Comparing Two Waist-to-Height Ratio Measurements with Cardiometabolic Risk Factors among Youth with Diabetes
- 1. University of Washington and Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA 98122, USA
- 2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Mail Stop K-10, 4770 Buford Highway, NE Atlanta, GA 30341- 3717, USA
- 3. 1001 Arbolado Road, Santa Barbara, CA 93103, USA
- 4. Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston- Salem, NC 27157, USA
- 5. Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, University of Colorado Denver, P. O. Box 6511, Mail Stop A140, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
- 6. Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, Mail Location 7012, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA
- 7. Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2211 McGavran Greenberg, CB 7461, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7461, USA
- 8. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Center for Research in Nutrition and Health Disparities, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 800 Sumter Street, Columbia, SC 29208, USA
Description
Background: Waist circumference (WC) is commonly measured by either the World Health Organization
(WHO) or National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) protocol.
Objective: Compare the associations of WHO vs. NHANES WC-to-height ratio (WHtR) protocols with cardiometabolic
risk factors (CMRFs) in a sample of youth with diabetes.
Methods: For youth (10–19 years old with type 1 [N=3082] or type 2 [N=533] diabetes) in the SEARCH for Diabetes in
Youth Study, measurements were obtained of WC (by two protocols), weight, height, fasting lipids (total cholesterol,
triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, Non-HDL cholesterol) and blood pressures. Associations of CMRFs with WHO and
NHANES WHtR were modeled stratified by body mass index (BMI) percentiles for age/sex: lower BMI (<85th BMI
percentile; N=2071) vs. higher BMI (≥85th percentile; N=1594).
Results: Among lower-BMI participants, both NHANES and WHO WHtR were associated (p<0.005) with all CMRFs
except blood pressure. Among higher-BMI participants, both NHANES and WHO WHtR were associated (p<0.05) with
all CMRFs. WHO WHtR was more strongly associated (p<0.05) than NHANES WHtR with triglycerides, non-HDL
cholesterol, and systolic blood pressure in lower-BMI participants. Among high-BMI participants, WHO WHtR was more
strongly associated (p<0.05) than NHANES WHtR with triglycerides and systolic blood pressure.
Conclusion: Among youth with diabetes, WHtR calculated from either WC protocol captures cardiometabolic risk. The
WHO WC protocol may be preferable to NHANES WC.
Files
IJCHNV5N3A1-Liu.pdf
Additional details
References
- Browning LM, Hsieh SD, Ashwell M. A systematic review of waist-to-height ratio as a screening tool for the prediction of cardiovascular disease and diabetes: 0.5 could be a suitable global boundary value. Nutr Res Rev 2010; 23: 247-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954422410000144
- McCarthy HD, Ashwell M. A study of central fatness using waist-to-height ratios in UK children and adolescents over two decades supports the simple message - 'keep your waist circumference to less than half your height.' Int J Obes (London) 2006; 30; 988-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0803226
- Kahn HS, El ghormli L, Jago R, et al. Cardiometabolic risk assessments by body mass index z-score or waist-to-height ratio in a multiethnic sample of sixth-graders. J Obes 2014; 2014: 421658. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/421658