Info: Zenodo’s user support line is staffed on regular business days between Dec 23 and Jan 5. Response times may be slightly longer than normal.

Published February 27, 2015 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Outcome Evaluation of a Pilot Study Using "Nudges"

  • 1. Department of Pediatrics – Nutrition, USDA/ARS Children's Nutrition Research Center, Baylor College of Medicine, 1100 Bates Street, Houston, TX 77030, USA
  • 2. Houston Independent School District, Hattie Mae White Educational Support Center, 4400 West 18Th Street, Houston, TX 77092, USA

Description

Background: Every school day, over 31 million U.S. children eat school lunches. Unfortunately, students often

do not choose the healthy options in the school cafeteria. This paper describes outcome results of a pilot study using

“nudges” to improve elementary school students’ fruits and vegetables selections.

Methods: A pilot study was conducted from January to May 2012, in six intervention schools and 2 control schools. A

behavioral economics-based intervention was conducted using “nudges” or cues from the cafeteria (staff encouragement

to select fruit and vegetables, food labels, “Harvest of the Month” posters), school (morning announcement messages,

prompts regarding cafeteria food selections), and parents (school newsletter articles, parent listserve messages) to

promote students’ selection of fruits and vegetables in the school cafeteria. The serving data from the point-of-service

machine provided fruits and vegetables served per student per day.

Results: There were no significant differences in the number of servings of fruits and vegetables served per student per

day, averaged over the study period. Process data revealed low implementation of the intervention components, which

may partially explain results.

Conclusions: Low implementation of nudges led to non-significant results in this pilot study. However, providing

environmental cues are important and warrant further research with full implementation. Starting 2012, the new meal

pattern includes two vegetables and a fruit serving for lunch; and two fruit servings for breakfast. Minimal cost

interventions should be explored to facilitate successful implementation of new school meal guidelines.

Files

IJCHNV4N1A3-Dave-OA.pdf

Files (118.7 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:bbd8eeefefdb7154672411f5b807c10f
118.7 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • Fox MK, Hamilton W, Lin BH. Effects of Food Assistance and Nutrition Programs on Nutrition and Health:Volume 4, Executive Summary of the Literature Review. USDA/ERS/ Food Assistance and Nutrition Research Report No. 19-4. (FANRR19-4). Available from http://www.ers.usda.gov/ media/872891/fanrr19-4_002.pdf. Accessed October 30, 2013.
  • Food and Nutrition Service - U.S. Department of Agriculture. National School Lunch Program Fact Sheet. 2012; Available from http://www.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/NSLPFact Sheet.pdf. Accessed October 30, 2013.
  • Cullen KW, Zakeri IE. Fruits, vegetables, milk, and sweetened beverages consumption and access to a la carte/snack bar meals at school. Am J Public Health 2004; 94: 463-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.94.3.463