Planned intervention: On Wednesday April 3rd 05:30 UTC Zenodo will be unavailable for up to 2-10 minutes to perform a storage cluster upgrade.
Published August 1, 2020 | Version v1
Journal article Open

A Comprehensive Analysis of ACO for Wireless Sensor Network Routing

  • 1. Research Scholor, VTU, AP/CSE, RRCE, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
  • 2. Professor/CSE, RVITM , Bangalore, Karnataka , India
  • 3. AP/CSE, DSATM, Bengaluru, India.
  • 1. Publisher

Description

The proliferations of IoT technologies and applications have led to an increased interest in Wireless Sensor Networks (and in particular, multi-hop networks). Wireless sensor networks are composed of small mobile terminals which have limited system resources. Due to this, these networks are vulnerable to changes in network status arising from changes in the network parameters such as, position / layout of sensors, signal strength, environmental conditions, etc. In addition, the network nodes are also constrained in terms of energy provided by the battery. It is an significant consideration to be accounted so as to prolong their operational time, since this adds to the network lifetime. Lot of research has gone into routing and transmission technologies for wireless sensor networks. Conventional routing mechanisms for WSNs still suffer from energy-hole problem caused by difficulties in adaptive route management. Thus, it is imperative that efficient routing mechanisms be developed in order to conserve energy and improve network lifetime. One popular approach is to use meta-heuristic algorithms for optimal path selection in a WSN route management system. A very popular meta-heuristic algorithm used for this objective is the Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) algorithms. ACO has been used as a base for many routing management systems. In this paper an extensive analysis of the performance of ACO based route selection mechanism is reported and also reporting a comparative analysis of efficacy of the ACO routing algorithm over the standard Greedy algorithm in finding routes with different count of sensor nodes and different count of ants. Then find that the ACO routing algorithm outdoes the Greedy algorithm with respect to the number of routes identified.

Files

F1628089620.pdf

Files (665.0 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:d06faa2ce264e5e0ca4a3e3527f750bf
665.0 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Related works

Is cited by
Journal article: 2249-8958 (ISSN)

Subjects

ISSN
2249-8958
Retrieval Number
F1628089620/2020©BEIESP