Progress in survival in renal cell carcinoma through 50 years evaluated in Finland and Sweden
- 1. Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Center in Pilsen, Charles University in Prague, Pilsen, Czech Republic. Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
- 2. Hopp Children's Cancer Center (KiTZ), Heidelberg, Germany. Division of Pediatric Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.
- 3. Cancer Gene Therapy Group, Translational Immunology Research Program, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
- 4. Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Urology and Andrology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
- 5. Cancer Gene Therapy Group, Translational Immunology Research Program, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. Department of Urology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Description
Global survival studies have shown favorable development in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treatment but few studies have considered extended periods or covered populations for which medical care is essentially free of charge. We analyzed RCC survival in Finland and Sweden over a 50-year period (1967-2016) using data from the NORDCAN database provided by the local cancer registries. While the health care systems are largely similar in the two countries, the economic resources have been stronger in Sweden. In addition to the standard 1- and 5-year relative survival rates, we calculated the difference between these as a measure of how well survival was maintained between years 1 and 5. Relative 1- year survival rates increased almost linearly in both countries and reached 90% in Sweden and 80% in Finland. Although 5-year survival also developed favorably the difference between 1- and 5-year survival rates did not improve in Sweden suggesting that the gains in 5-year survival were entirely due to gains in 1-year survival. In Finland there was a gain in survival between years 1 and 5, but the gain in 1-years survival was the main contributor to the favorable 5-year survival. Age group specific analysis showed large survival differences, particularly among women. Towards the end of the follow-up period the differences narrowed but the disadvantage of the old patients remained in 5-year survival. The limitations of the study were lack of information on performed treatment and clinical stage in the NORDCAN database. In conclusion, the available data suggest that earlier diagnosis and surgical treatment of RCC have been the main driver of the favorable change in survival during the past 50 years. The main challenges are to reduce the age-specific survival gaps, particularly among women, and push survival gains past year 1.
Notes
Files
598036.pdf
Files
(1.1 MB)
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:633ac9f58d4c90bbe72262bfef93559d
|
1.1 MB | Preview Download |