Published January 6, 2010 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Hirondellea Chevreux 1889

Description

Hirondellea Chevreux, 1889

Hirondellea Chevreux, 1889: 285. ― Stebbing, 1906: 16. ― Gurjanova, 1962: 88. ― J.L. Barnard, 1969: 345. ― Barnard & Ingram, 1990: 7. ― Barnard & Karaman, 1991: 490.

Tetronychia Stephensen, 1923: 63. ― Schellenberg, 1926: 251 [type species Tetronychia abyssalis Stephensen, 1923 by monotypy].

Type species. Hirondellea trioculata Chevreux, 1889, by original designation.

Species composition. Hirondellea includes 16 species: Hirondellea abyssalis (Stephensen, 1923); H. antarctica (Schellenberg, 1926); H. brevicaudata Chevreux, 1910; H. diamantina sp. nov.; H. dubia Dahl, 1959; H. endeavour sp. nov.; H. fidenter J.L. Barnard, 1966; H. franklin sp. nov.; H. gigas (Birstein & Vinogradov, 1955); H. glutonis Barnard & Ingram, 1990; H. guyoti Barnard & Ingram, 1990; H. kapala sp. nov.; H. naturaliste sp. nov.; H. sindhusagar Horton & Thurston, 2009; H. trioculata Chevreux, 1889; H. wolfendeni (Tattersall, 1909) comb. nov.

Remarks. The taxon Hirondellea wolfendeni is newly included here as a species of Hirondellea. Tattersall (1909) originally assigned it, with some doubts, to the genus Anonyx where it has remained ever since. The characteristic maxilla 1 with subterminal notch on the palp and one of the inner plate setae very broad at the base, clearly place this species in the genus Hirondellea.

Based on the misleading illustration (fig. 9) of Stephensen (1923), Gurjanova (1962), Barnard & Ingram (1990) and Horton & Thurston (2009) all key H. abyssalis as having the inner ramus of uropod 2 constricted. Stephensen (1923: 64) noted of uropod 2 that "… in the right side only the proximal part of outer ramus is kept, the inner ramus is totally lost; and in the left up. 2 both of the rami are very short and seem to be in regeneration...". We have looked at Stephensen's slide and found no constriction on the uropod 2 inner ramus. We suspect that even if it were regenerating it would show some sign of the constriction. The species has never been re-collected. We cannot say for certain whether H. abyssalis uropod 2 inner ramus is constricted or not but the current evidence suggests that it is not constricted and that it should not be recorded as constricted.

Distribution. Hirondelleids have been recorded from all major ocean bodies except the South Atlantic Ocean, the southern Indian Ocean, the Mediterranean Sea and the North Polar Sea.

Notes

Published as part of Lowry, J. K. & Stoddart, H. E., 2010, The deep-sea scavenging genus Hirondellea (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Lysianassoidea: Hirondelleidae fam. nov.) in Australian waters, pp. 37-55 in Zootaxa 2329 (1) on pages 38-39, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.2329.1.3, http://zenodo.org/record/10093641

Files

Files (3.1 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:4b6654586e8a689ce07c50495fce9e6c
3.1 kB Download

System files (26.2 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:0984d7c0310d7c9f4fcb95bb09108dcc
26.2 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Family
Hirondelleidae
Genus
Hirondellea
Kingdom
Animalia
Order
Amphipoda
Phylum
Arthropoda
Scientific name authorship
Chevreux
Taxon rank
genus
Taxonomic concept label
Hirondellea Chevreux, 1889 sec. Lowry & Stoddart, 2010

References

  • Chevreux, E. (1889) Amphipodes nouveaux provenant des campagnes de l' Hirondelle 1887 - 1888. Bulletin de la Societe Zoologique de France, 14, 283 - 289.
  • Stebbing, T. R. R. (1906) Amphipoda. I. Gammaridea. Das Tierreich, 21, 1 - 806.
  • Gurjanova, E. F. (1962) [Amphipods of the northern part of the Pacific Ocean (Amphipoda-Gammaridea). Part 1]. Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Opredeliteli po Faune SSSR, 74, 1 - 440.
  • Barnard, J. L. (1969) The families and genera of marine gammaridean Amphipoda. Bulletin of the United States National Museum, 271, 1 - 535.
  • Barnard, J. L. & Ingram, C. (1990) Lysianassoid Amphipoda (Crustacea) from deep-sea thermal vents. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, 499, 1 - 80.
  • Barnard, J. L. & Karaman, G. S. (1991) The families and genera of marine gammaridean Amphipoda (except marine gammaroids). Records of the Australian Museum, Supplement, 13 (1 & 2), 1 - 866.
  • Stephensen, K. (1923) Crustacea Malacostraca, V, (Amphipoda, I). Danish Ingolf-Expedition, 3 (8), 1 - 100.
  • Schellenberg, A. (1926) Die Gammariden der Deutschen Sudpolar-Expedition 1901 - 1903. Deutsche Sudpolar- Expedition, 18 (Zoology 10), 235 - 414.
  • Chevreux, E. (1910) Diagnoses d'amphipodes nouveaux provenant des campagnes de la Princesse-Alice dans l'Atlantique nord (suite). Bulletin de l'Institut Oceanographique, Monaco, 156, 1 - 4.
  • Dahl, E. (1959) Amphipoda from depths exceeding 6000 meters. Galathea Report, 1, 211 - 241.
  • Barnard, J. L. (1966) Submarine canyons of southern California. Part V. Systematics, Amphipoda. Allan Hancock Pacific Expeditions, 27 (5), 1 - 166.
  • Birstein, J. A. & Vinogradov, M. E. (1955) [Pelagic gammarideans (Amphipoda-Gammaridea) from the Kurile- Kamchatka Trench]. Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Trudy Instituta Okeanologii, 12, 210 - 287.
  • Horton, T. & Thurston, M. (2009) Hirondellea sindhusagar (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Lysianassoidea), a new deep-water scavenger species from the Indian Ocean, with a key to the genus Hirondellea. Zootaxa, 2096, 433 - 441.
  • Tattersall, W. M. (1909) Amphipoda and Isopoda, with descriptions of two new species. Memoirs of the Challenger Society, 1, 210 - 219, pls 4, 5.