Published December 31, 2015 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Pseudocallisoma coecum Holmes 1908, comb. nov.

Description

Pseudocallisoma coecum (Holmes, 1908) comb. nov.

Figs 19–21

Scopelocheirus coecus Holmes 1908: 500, figs 10–12. Shoemaker 1945: 186 (in part, part? P. platepistomum).—J.L Barnard 1954: 54, figs 4, 5.— Gurjanova 1951: 241 (key).

Paracallisoma coecum.— Hurley 1963: 61, fig. 18.—Andres 1977, 60. Barnard & Karaman 1991: 511.— Thurston 2001: 685 (table 2).

Paracallisoma coecus.— J.L. Barnard 1958: 97 (list).— J.L. Barnard 1964: 319, fig. 3.— Brusca 1967a: 384, 385, table 4.— Brusca 1967b: 450.— Childress & Nygaard 1974: 228, table 1(physiology).— Childress 1975: 788 (table 1a) (physiology).— Quetin, Ross & Uchio 1980: table 1(physiology).— Smith & Baldwin 1982: 292 (table 3).— Austin 1985: 601.— Vermeer & Devito 1988: 65, 67, table 2 (ecology).— Ikeda 2013: 342 (table 1).

Paracallisoma alberti.— Birstein & Vinogradov 1955: 223, 279 (in part).—Birstein & Vinogradov 1958: 228.—Birstein & Vinogradov 1960: 176, fig. 5, 233, fig. 33.— Gurjanova 1962: 309, fig. 102.— Nagata 1963: 1.—Birstein & Vinogradov 1970: table 1, table 3.— Hatch 1983: 194, 195, table 3 (ecology).— Nysewander 1983: 328, table 7 (ecology).— Sanger & Ainley 1988: 182 (ecology).— Hatch 2013: 275 (ecology).

Not Paracallisoma coecum = Paracallisoma platepistomum.— Shoemaker 1945:186.

Material examined. Holotype —female, 20.8 mm, specimen and four slides, USNM, 38538. Bureau of Fisheries, Station 4405, 1196– 1287 m, off San Clemente Island, California, 0 9 April 1904.

Description. Holotype, female, 20.8 mm USNM, 38538.

Antenna 1 peduncle article 1 short, length 0.9 x breadth, without posterodistal spine or lobe; peduncle article 2 short, 0.5 x article 1; peduncle article 3 short, 0.26 x article 1; flagellum seven-articulate, without posterodistal setae, callynophore present, calceoli absent; accessory flagellum long, 0.63 x primary flagellum, five-articulate, article 1 short, 0.6 x article 2. Antenna 2 length 1.2 x antenna 1; peduncle without brush setae; peduncle article 1 greatly enlarged, not covering article 2; article 3 short, 0.6 x article 4; peduncle articles 4 and 5 not enlarged; flagellum well-developed, nine-articulate, calceoli absent.

Mouthpart bundle—Right mandible incisor symmetrical, large, slightly convex margin with tooth-like projection at either end; lacinia absent; accessory setal row with three robust setae, lacking distal setal tuft; molar an acute conical structure, mandibular palp attached midway; article 1 short, length 0.64 x breadth, without setae; article 2 slender, length 3.25 x breadth, with 24 submarginal posterodistal A2-setae; article 3 slender, oval, with 19 D3 setae along distal two thirds of the margin, and 3 E3 setae.

Gnathopod 1 simple; coxa large, shorter than coxa 2, tapering, rounded distally, anterior margin slightly concave; basis long, expanded distally, length 2.7 x breadth, anterior margin smooth, with 14 simple setae; ischium short, length 1.2 x breadth, anterior margin smooth; merus, posterior margin without distal setae; carpus subrectangular, long, length 3.3 x breadth, longer than propodus; propodus tapering distally, posterior margin with a few groups of simple, slender setae, apex with numerous distally pappose robust setae; dactylus minute, complex, covered in sensory setae. Gnathopod 2 subchelate; coxa large, tapering slightly; ischium long, length 2.8 x breadth; carpus long, length 3.75 x breadth, posterior margin straight; propodus subrectangular, narrow, length 2.4 x breadth with numerous pappose robust setae distally; posterior margin with seven groups of slender robust setae, apically with row of distally plumose setae; palm very short, acute, with short setules, palmar corner with one long and one short robust seta; dactylus inserted in anterior third of propodus apex, curved, just longer than palm, posterior margin with three setae. Pereopods simple. Pereopod 3 missing. Pereopod 4 coxa wider than deep, posterior lobe well-developed, broadly rounded, posterior margin sloping anteriorly, breadth 1.1 x depth; basis slender, straight; merus not expanded anteriorly; carpus slender, posterior margin strongly setose; propodus slender, posterior margin with five robust setae and two distal locking setae; dactylus long, straight. Pereopod 5 coxa large, deep, width 1.4 x depth weakly lobate posteriorly with a lateral ridge, twelve simple setae along posterodistal margin; basis weakly expanded proximally, strongly widening distally, posterodistal lobe large, reaching a quarter of the way along the merus, anterior margin with four robust setae distally; merus very slightly expanded posteriorly with robust setae on both posterior and anterior margins; carpus slender, posterior margin strongly setose; propodus very long, slender, tapering, length 6.3 x breadth, anterior margin with three robust setae and one pair of distal locking setae; dactylus slender, tip broken. Pereopod 6 coxa small, not lobate posteriorly; basis anterior margin evenly convex, posterior margin expanded, straight, with eleven simple setae, rounded posterodistal lobe reaching merus; merus as in pereopod 5; carpus 1.1 x propodus; propodus very long, tapering, length 7.4 x breadth, anterior margin with nine robust setae and one pair of distal locking setae, posterior margin with 13 long slender simple setae; dactylus, slender, tip broken. Pereopod 7 coxa small, posterior lobate; basis, anterior margin weakly convex, proximal posterior margin expanded, rounded, convex, then sloping slightly anteriorly and excavate posterodistally, posterodistal lobe narrow, reaching almost halfway along merus; merus anterior and posterior margins subparallel; carpus 1.07 x propodus; propodus long, slender, length 6.1 x breadth, anterior margin with seven groups of robust setae, and one pair of distal locking setae; dactylus, slender, tip broken.

Gills on pereopods 2–7. Brood plates on pereopods 2–5.

Uropod 1 peduncle long, 1.9 x inner ramus, with five lateral robust setae, one dorsal robust seta, and eleven dorsomedial robust setae; rami subequal; inner ramus, with seven medial robust setae, and five lateral robust setae; outer ramus, with three lateral robust setae and 2 medial robust setae. Uropod 2 missing. Uropod 3 peduncle short, length 0.8 x inner ramus, with one apicolateral robust seta, one simple seta, two dorsal slender simple setae, and five medial slender simple setae; inner ramus, with six medial robust setae and 13 medial slender plumose setae, with a microsetose distomedial margin; outer ramus, 2-articulate, article 2 short, with a microsetose distomedial margin; article 1 with six medial robust setae, six slender plumose setae, and one robust seta apicolaterally.

Telson longer than broad, slender and strongly tapering distally, length 1.65 x breadth, cleft 62%, with a pair of dorsolateral robust setae, lobes subacute, lacking apical incision.

Supplementary description from Barnard (1954) illustrations & material. Head exposed, deeper than long, lateral cephalic lobe large, narrow, subacute; rostrum absent; eyes apparently absent. Maxilla 1 inner plate tapering distally, inner margin fully setose, with>20 pappose setae; outer plate narrow with eleven setal teeth in 7/ 4 arrangement; palp large, two-articulate, article 1 short, article 2 narrow, with six terminal robust setae, one robust flag seta; Maxilla 2 inner plate broad, rounded apically, with pappose setae in oblique mediofacial setal row; outer plate slightly longer than inner. Maxilliped inner plate large, subrectangular, emarginate distally with three apical nodular setae, oblique facial setal row strong with 16 pappose setae; outer plate medium size, subrectangular with apical plumose setae and small nodular setae medially; palp large, 4-articulate, article 2 broad, article 3 long, slender, length 3.3 x breadth; dactylus well-developed.

Remarks. Pseudocallisoma coecum (Holmes, 1908), the type species of this genus is described here from the holotype, a carcass and slides in poor condition supplemented by the material figured by Barnard (1954). Pseudocallisoma coecum, originally placed in Scopelocheirus by Holmes (1908), and then Paracallisoma by Schellenberg (1926a), is known from the Pacific Ocean at depths down to 4023 m. A single male specimen was illustrated by Barnard (1954) from bathypelagic material collected by the Vel ero IV off the coast of California. The male differs only in the longer second antennae which are about three times as long as in the female and with the presence of calceoli on both antennae (Barnard 1954). A juvenile specimen (6 mm) was figured by Barnard (1964), and differs in the less setose mouthparts, the outer plate of the maxilliped having only four lateral setae instead of 14. Pseudocallisoma coecum has also been recorded frequently at high northern latitudes in the Pacific under the name Paracallisoma alberti by Birstein and Vinogradov (1955, 1958, 1960, 1962, 1964, 1970) and Gurjanova (1962). This species is closely related to P. platepistomum (see remarks section for P. platepistomum).

Depth range. 500–4023 m (Holmes 1908; Shoemaker 1945; Barnard 1964; Brusca 1967; Childress & Nygaard 1974). Records from hauls fished with open nets (e.g. 0–9000 m, Birstein and Vinogradov (1958)) are uninformative and have been excluded. Although the shallowest depth of occurrence for net-caught material is ca. 500 m, this species is reported as a constituent of seabird stomach contents (Hatch 1983, 2013; Nysewander 1983; Vermeer & Devito 1988; Sanger & Ainley 1988). P. c o ec u m has been found in stomach contents of six widely divergent species of seabird (Sanger & Ainley 1988) and forms an important part of the diet of two storm petrel species (Vermeer & Devito 1988). Storm petrels do not dive and feed by picking food items from the surface while airborne. P. coecum is positively buoyant and may have to swim to stay down (Childress & Nygaard 1974) but it seems improbable that the storm petrel diet consists entirely of dead or moribund individuals.

Distribution. Pacific Ocean: off San Clemente Island, California, United States (Holmes 1908); Pacific City, Oregon, United States (from the stomach of a duck*) (Shoemaker 1945); San Nicolas Basin and off Santa Barbara Island, California, United States (Barnard 1954); outer Santa Barbara Passage, California, United States (Hurley 1963); off Kamchatka, Russia (Shoemaker 1945; Gurjanova 1962); Gulf of Alaska (Barnard 1964); Kuril- Kamchatka Trench (Birstein & Vinogradov 1958); near the Tenji Seamount, south-south-west of the Aleutian Trench (Birstein & Vinogradov 1958); near the Makarov Seamount (Birstein & Vinogradov 1960); Japan Trench (Nagata 1963) (from Kilgallen & Lowry 2015). [*This material was collected from the stomach of a storm petrel, not a duck.]

Notes

Published as part of Horton, Tammy & Thurston, Michael H., 2015, A revision of the genus Paracallisoma Chevreux, 1903 (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Scopelocheiridae: Paracallisominae) with a redescription of the type species of the genus Paracallisoma and the description of two new genera and two new species from the Atlantic Ocean, pp. 91-132 in Zootaxa 3995 (1) on pages 122-127, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3995.1.12, http://zenodo.org/record/233262

Files

Files (11.8 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:af4f233845f1babe7af4664077e15ff4
11.8 kB Download

System files (56.9 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:d36c693f5290de9702a1df10214673a1
56.9 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Family
Scopelocheiridae
Genus
Pseudocallisoma
Kingdom
Animalia
Order
Amphipoda
Phylum
Arthropoda
Scientific name authorship
Holmes
Species
coecum
Taxonomic status
comb. nov.
Taxon rank
species
Taxonomic concept label
Pseudocallisoma coecum (Holmes, 1908) sec. Horton & Thurston, 2015

References

  • Holmes, S. J. (1908) The Amphipoda collected by the U. S. Bureau of Fisheries steamer " Albatross " off the west coast of North America, in 1903 and 1904, with descriptions of a new family and several new genera and species. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 35, 489 - 543. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.5479 / si. 00963801.35 - 1654.489
  • Shoemaker, C. (1945) The Amphipoda of the Bermuda Oceanographic Expeditions, 1929 - 1931. Zoologica, Scientific Contributions of the New York Zoological Society, 30, 185 - 266.
  • Barnard, J. L. (1954) Four species of bathypelagic Gammaridea (Amphipoda) from California. Allan Hancock Foundation Publications, Occasional Paper, 13, 52 - 69.
  • Gurjanova, E. F. (1951) Amphipods of the seas of the USSR and surrounding waters (Amphipoda-Gammaridea). Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Opredeliteli po Faune SSSR, 41, 1 - 1029. [In Russian]
  • Hurley, D. E. (1963) Amphipoda of the family Lysianassidae from the west coast of North and Central America. Allan Hancock Foundation Publications, Occasional Paper, 25, 1 - 160.
  • Barnard, J. L. & Karaman, G. S. (1991) The families and genera of marine gammaridean Amphipoda (except marine gammaroids). Records of the Australian Museum, Supplement 13, 1 - 866. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.3853 / j. 0812 - 7387.13.1991.91
  • Thurston, M. H. (2001) Pelagic amphipods. In: Jazdzewski K., Baldinger A., Coleman C. O., De Broyer C., Gable M. F. & Plaiti W. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Xth International Colloquium on Amphipoda, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, 16 - 21 April 2000. Polskie Archiwum Hydrobiologii, 682 - 694.
  • Barnard, J. L. (1958) Index to the families, genera, and species of the gammaridean Amphipoda (Crustacea). Allan Hancock Foundation Publications, Occasional Paper, 19, 1 - 145.
  • Barnard, J. L. (1964) Some bathyal Pacific Amphipoda collected by the U. S. S. Albatross. Pacific Science, 18 (3), 315 - 335.
  • Brusca, G. J. (1967 a) The ecology of pelagic Amphipoda, I. Species accounts, vertical zonation and migration of Amphipoda from the waters off southern California. Pacific Science, 21 (3), 382 - 393.
  • Brusca, G. J. (1967 b) The ecology of pelagic Amphipoda, II. Observations on the reproductive cycles of several pelagic amphipods from the waters off southern California. Pacific Science, 21 (4), 449 - 456.
  • Childress, J. J. & Nygaard, M. (1974) Chemical composition and buoyancy of midwater crustaceans as function of depth of occurrence off Southern California. Marine Biology, 27, 225 - 238. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1007 / BF 00391948
  • Childress, J. J. (1975) The respiratory rates of midwater crustaceans as a function of depth of occurrence and relation to the oxygen minimum layer off Southern California. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, 50 A, 787 - 799. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1016 / 0300 - 9629 (75) 90146 - 2
  • Quetin, L. B., Ross, R. M. & Uchio, K. (1980) Metabolic characteristics of midwater zooplankton: Ammonia excretion, O: N ratios, and the effect of starvation. Marine Biology, 59, 201 - 209. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1007 / BF 00404742
  • Smith, K. L. & Baldwin, R. J. (1982) Scavenging deep-sea amphipods: effects of food odor on oxygen consumption and a proposed metabolic strategy. Marine Biology, 68, 287 - 298. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1007 / BF 00409595
  • Austin, W. C. (Eds) (1985) An Annotated Checklist of Marine Invertebrates in the Cold Temperate Northeast Pacific. 3 ed. Cowichan, B. C., Khoyatan Marine Laboratory, 682 pp.
  • Vermeer, K. & Devito, K. (1988) The importance of Paracallisoma coecus and myctophid fishes to nesting fork-tailed and Leach's storm-petrels in the Queen Charlotte Islands, British Columbia. Journal of Plankton Research, 10 (l), 63 - 75. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1093 / plankt / 10.1.63
  • Ikeda, T. (2013) Metabolism and chemical composition of marine pelagic amphipods: synthesis toward a global bathymetric model. Journal of Oceanography, 69 (3), 339 - 355. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1007 / s 10872 - 013 - 0177 - 5.
  • Birstein, Ia. A. & Vinogradov, M. E. (1955) Pelagicheskie gammaridy (Amphipoda - Gammaridea) Kurilo-Kamchatskoi Vpadiny. [Pelagic gammarids (Amphipoda - Gammaridea) of the Kurile - Kamchatka Trench]. Trudy Instituta Okeanologii, 12, 210 - 287.
  • Birstein, Ia. A. & Vinogradov, M. E. (1958) Pelagicheskie gammaridy (Amphipoda - Gammaridea) severo-zapadnoi chasti Tikhogo Okeana. [Pelagic gammarids of the north-west parts of the Pacific Ocean]. Trudy Instituta Okeanologii, 27, 219 - 257.
  • Birstein Ia. A. & Vinogradov, M. E. (1960) Pelagicheskie gammaridy (Amphipoda - Gammaridea) tropicheskoi chasti Tikhogo Okeana. [Pelagic gammarids from the tropical Pacific Ocean]. Trudy Instituta Okeanologii, 34, 165 - 241.
  • Gurjanova, E. F. (1962) Amphipods of the northern part of the Pacific Ocean (Amphipoda-Gammaridea). Part 1. Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Opredeliteli po Faune SSSR, 74, 1 - 440. [In Russian]
  • Nagata, K. (1963) Two new gammaridean amphipods (Crustacea) collected by the second cruise of the Japanese expedition of deep sea. Publications of the Seto Marine Biological Laboratory, 11 (1), 1 - 5.
  • Birstein, Ia. A. & Vinogradov, M. E. (1970) O faune pelagicheskikh gammarid Kurilo-Kamchatskogo raiona Tikhogo Okeana. Trudy Instituta Okeanologii, 86, 401 - 419. Translation [On the fauna of the pelagic gammarids of the Kurile - Kamchatka region of the Pacific Ocean. In: Bogorov, V. G. (Eds), Fauna of the Kurile - Kamchatka Trench and its environment. Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem, pp. 419 - 438. (1972)].
  • Hatch, S. A. (1983) Storm-petrels (Oceanodroma spp.). In: Baird P. A. & Gould P. J. (Eds.). The breeding biology and feeding ecology of marine birds in the Gulf of Alaska. Final Report, Outer Continental Shelf Environmental Assessment Program Research Unit, 341, 171 - 206.
  • Nysewander, D. R. (1983) Black-legged Kittiwake (Rissa tridactyla). In: Baird P. A. & Gould, P. J. (Eds.), The breeding biology and feeding ecology of marine birds in the Gulf of Alaska. Final Report, Outer Continental Shelf Environmental Assessment Program Research Unit, 341, 295 - 348.
  • Sanger, G. A. & Ainley, D. (1988) Review of the distribution and feeding ecology of seabirds in the oceanic subarctic North Pacific Ocean. In: Nemoto, T. & Pearcy, W. G. (Eds.), The Biology of the Subarctic Pacific. (Proceedings of the Japan- United States of America seminar on the biology of the micronekton of the Subarctic Pacific.) Part 2. Bulletin of the Ocean Research Institute, University of Tokyo, 26 (2), 161 - 186.
  • Hatch, S. A. (2013) Kittiwake diets and chick production signal a 2008 regime shift in the Northeast Pacific. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 477, 271 - 284. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.3354 / meps 10161
  • Schellenberg, A. (1926 a) Die Gammariden der Deutschen Sudpolar-Expedition 1901 - 1903. Deutsche Sudpolar-Expedition, 18, 235 - 414.
  • Birstein Ia. A. & Vinogradov, M. E. (1962) Pelagicheskie gammaridy (Amphipoda - Gammaridea) sobrannye sovetskoi antarkticheskoi expeditsiei na dizel' - elektrokhode " Ob " k iugu ot 40 ° iu. Issledovaniia Fauny Morei, 1 (IX), 36 - 57. Translation [Pelagic Gammaridea (Amphipoda) collected by the Soviet Antarctic Expedition on the M / V " Ob ", south of 40 ° S. Studies of marine fauna I (IX), Biological Reports of the Soviet Antarctic Expedition (1955 - 1958), 1, 33 - 56, 1966].
  • Birstein Ia. A. & Vinogradov, M. E. (1964) Pelagicheskie gammaridy (Amphipoda - Gammaridea) severnoi chasti Indiiskogo Okeana [Pelagic gammarid amphipods of the northern part of the Indian Ocean]. Trudy Instituta Okeanologii, 65, 152 - 195.
  • Kilgallen, N. M. & Lowry, J. K. (2015) A review of the scopelocheirid amphipods (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Lysianassoidea), with the description of new taxa from Australian waters. Zoosystematics and Evolution, 91 (1), 1 - 43. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.3897 / zse. 91.8440