Published April 24, 2012
| Version v1
Figure
Open
FIGURE 4. A in Are Bryodrilus parvus Nurminen, 1970 and Bryodrilus librus (Nielsen and Christensen, 1959) (Annelida: Enchytraeidae) really different species? A revision based on DNA barcodes and morphological data
- 1. Systematic Zoology Research Group of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences Eötvös Loránd University, Department of Systematic Zoology and Ecology 1117 Budapest, Pázmány Péter sétány 1/C, Hungary
- 2. Laboratoire d'Ecologie, EA 1293 ECODIV, Bâtiment IRESE A, UFR Sciences et Techniques, Université de Rouen, Place Emile Blondel, 76821 Mont Saint Aignan Cedex France
Description
FIGURE 4. A. Nephridium in 9/10, ectal duct originates medioventrally (marked with black arrow). Stained, on slide. Ellef Island, Canada. B. Nephridia in posterior segments, ectal duct originates posteroventrally (marked with black arrow, i = intestine). In vivo. Mezőföld, Hungary. C. Coelomocytes (marked with black arrow). In vivo. Kiskunság, Hungary. D. Coelomocytes (marked with black arrows). In vivo. Russebukta, Svalbard. E. Sperm funnel (marked with black arrow) Stained, on slide. Ellef Island, Canada. F. Sperm funnel (marked with black arrow) In vivo. Mezőföld, Hungary.
Notes
Files
figure.png
Files
(4.0 MB)
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:439158560729ec4d1495aa123cf4d3d1
|
4.0 MB | Preview Download |
Linked records
Additional details
Related works
- Is part of
- Journal article: 10.11646/zootaxa.3276.1.2 (DOI)
- Journal article: urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:FC47FF8223033D30FFDFBD38FFC8FF87 (LSID)
- Journal article: https://zenodo.org/record/5249382 (URL)