Published October 22, 2018 | Version v1
Journal article Open

New species of Pseudoptilolepis Snyder, 1949 (Diptera: Muscidae) from Brazil

Description

Barbosa, Leandro Silva, Vieira, Angelina Pimentel, Couri, Marcia Souto (2018): New species of Pseudoptilolepis Snyder, 1949 (Diptera: Muscidae) from Brazil. Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia 58: 1-4, DOI: 10.11606/1807-0205/2018.58.47, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/1807-0205/2018.58.47

Files

source.pdf

Files (1.4 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:565e20c48459f68a847ef83972bc8cc1
1.4 MB Preview Download

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:565EFFC48459FF8A847EF839FFBCFFC1
URL
http://publication.plazi.org/id/565EFFC48459FF8A847EF839FFBCFFC1

Related works

References

  • Pseudoptilolepis Snyder, 1949 (Diptera: Muscidae) has its distribution restricted to the Neotropics (Lopes & Carvalho, 1985) and was originally proposed to four species: P. fulvapoda, P. nigripoda, P.nudapleura and P.confusa.Albuquerque (1954) added a new species, P. fluminensis. Pont (1972) proposed, in the Neotropical catalog, the new combination of Mydaea latipalpis Stein, 1918 to Pseudoptilolepis, already supported by previous considerations of Snyder (1949) and Albuquerque (1954). Lopes & Carvalho (1985) described the male of P. nudapleura and illustrated, for the first time, the terminalia of the four species previously described by Snyder (1949). In addition, they recorded the occurrence of P. fluminensis and P. fulvapoda from Curitiba (Parana, Brazil).
  • Schuhli & Carvalho (2005) revised Pseudoptilolepis and described four new species - P. centralis, P. chrysella, P. crocina, P. elbida. The authors also performed a cladistic analysis for eight species of Pseudoptilolepis (P. latipalpis and P. confusa were not included), based on 10 morphological characters. The genus was supported as monophyletic based on the forked aedeagus and the setulose calyptra.
  • Pseudoptilolepis belongs to the subfamily Cyrtoneurininae (Pont, 1972; Carvalho, 1993). A recent study by Haseyama et al. (2015) based on molecular analysis corroborated the traditional placement of the genus in Cyrtoneurininae.