Biodiversity Literature Repository

Submit to community
Liberated Data
Published April 23, 2010 | Version v1
Journal article Restricted

Anuran assemblage in a rice field agroecosystem in the Pantanal of central Brazil

Authors/Creators

Description

Piatti, Liliana, Souza, Franco Leandro, Filho, Paulo Landgref (2010): Anuran assemblage in a rice field agroecosystem in the Pantanal of central Brazil. Journal of Natural History 44 (19-20): 1215-1224, DOI: 10.1080/00222930903499804, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222930903499804

Files

Restricted

The record is publicly accessible, but files are restricted to users with access.

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:FFFF6D32196A6742FFA7FFD7E754FFC1

Related works

Has part
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5209572 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5209574 (DOI)

References

  • Avila RW, Ferreira VL. 2004. Riqueza e densidade de vocalizacao de anuros (Amphibia) em uma area urbana de Corumba, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil. Rev Bras Zool. 21:887-892.
  • Babbitt KJ, Baber MJ, Childers DL, Hocking D. 2009. Influence of agricultural upland habitat type on larval anuran assemblages in seasonally inundated wetlands. Wetlands 26:294-301.
  • Baker JM, Halliday TR 1999. Amphibian colonization of new ponds in an agricultural landscape. Herpetol J. 9:55-63.
  • Bambaradeniya CNB, Edirisinghe JP, De Silva DN. 2004. Biodiversity associated with an irrigated rice agro-ecosystem in Sri Lanka. Biodivers Conserv. 13:1715-1753.
  • Beebee TJC, Griffiths RA. 2005. The amphibian decline crisis: a watershed for conservation biology? Biol Conserv. 125:271-285.
  • Beja P, Alcazar C. 2003. Conservation of Mediterranean temporary ponds under agricultural intensification: an evaluation using amphibians. Biol Conserv. 144:317-326.
  • Brasileiro CA, Sawaya RJ, Kiefer MC, Martins M. 2005. Amphibians of a cerrado fragment in Southeastern Brazil. Biota Neotropica 5:97-105.
  • Candioti MFV, Brusquetti F, Netto F. 2007. Morphological characterization of Leptodactylus elenae tadpoles (Anura: Leptodactylidae: L. fuscus group), from central Paraguay. Zootaxa. 1435:1-17.
  • Davidson C. 2004. Declining downwind: amphibian population declines in California and historical pesticide use. Ecol Appl. 14:1892-1902.
  • Doody JS, Osborne W, Bourne D, Rennie B, Sims RA. 2006. Vertebrate biodiversity on Australian rice farms. Kingston (ACT, Australia): Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation.
  • Dure M, Kehr AI, Schaefer EF, Mangaroni F. 2008. Diversity of amphibians in rice fields from northeastern Argentina. IterSciencia 33:523-527.
  • Elphick CS. 2000. Functional equivalency between rice fields and semi-natural wetland habitats. Conserv Biol. 14:181-191.
  • Elphick CS. 2004. Assessing conservation trade-offs: identifying the effects of flooding rice fields for waterbirds on non-target species. Biol Conserv. 117:105-110.
  • Fasola M, Ruiz X. 1996. The value of rice fields as substitutes for natural wetlands for waterbirds in the Mediterranean Region. Colon Waterbird. 19:122-128.
  • Fernando CH. 1995. Rice fields are aquatic, semi-aquatic, terrestrial and agricultural: a complex and questionable limnology. Trop Limnol. 1:121-148.
  • Fernando CH. 1996. Ecology of rice fields and its bearing on fisheries and fish culture. Perspectives in Asian fisheries. Manila (Philippines): Asian Fisheries Society.
  • Fujioka M, Lane SJ. 1997. The impact of changing irrigation practices in rice fields on frog population of the Kanto Plain, central Japan. Ecol Res. 12:101-108.
  • Gray MJ, Smith LM, Brenes R. 2004. Effects of agricultural cultivation on demographics of Southern High Plains amphibians. Conserv Biol. 18:1368-1377.
  • Haddad CFB, Prado CPA. 2005. Reproductive modes in frogs and their unexpected diversity in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil. Bioscience 55:207-217.
  • Harris MB, Tomas W, Mourao G, Silva CJ, Guimaraes E, Sonoda F, Fachim E. 2005. Safeguarding the Pantanal Wetlands: threats and conservation initiatives. Conserv Biol. 19:714-720.
  • Joly P, Miaud C, Lehmann A, Grolet O. 2001. Habitat matrix effects on pond occupancy in newts. Conserv. Biol. 15:239-248.
  • Junk WJ, Bayley PB, Sparks RE. 1989. The flood pulse concept in river-floodplain system. Can SP Fish Aquat Sci. 106:110-127.
  • Junk WJ, Watzen KM. 2004. The flood pulse concept: news aspects, approaches and application - an update. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on the Management of Large Rivers for Fisheries. Bangkok (Thailand); p. 117-149.
  • Junk WJ, Cunha CN, Wantzen KM, Petermann P, Strussmann C, Marques MI, Adis J. 2006. Biodiversity and its conservation in the Pantanal Of Mato Grosso, Brazil. Aquat Sci. 68:278-309.
  • Knutson MG, Richardson WB, Reineke DM, Gray BR, Parmelee JR, Weick SE. 2004. Agricultural ponds support amphibian populations. Ecol Appl. 14:669-684.
  • Maeda T. 2001. Patterns of bird abundance and habitat use in rice fields of the Kanto Plain, central Japan. Ecol Res. 16:569-585.
  • Mato Grosso do Sul. 1989. Macrozoneamento geoambiental do Estado de Mato Grosso do Sul. Campo Grande, MS: Secretaria de Planejamento e Obras de Mato Grosso do Sul - SEPLAN.
  • McLaughlin A, Pierre M. 1995. The impact of agriculture practices on biodiversity. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 55:201-212.
  • Miranda JR, Miranda EE. 2004. Sistemas de producao organica de cana-de-acucar: monitoramento qualificado de biodiversidade. Embrapa - Comun Tec. 13:1-20.
  • Oliveira MD, Calheiros DF. 2000. Flood pulse influence on phytoplankton communities of the south Pantanal floodplain, Brazil. Hydrobiologia 427:101-112.
  • PCBAP. 1997. Diagnostico dos meios fisico e biotico. Projeto Pantanal, Programa Nacional do Meio Ambiente. Plano de Conservacao da Bacia do Alto Paraguai. Meio fisico, vol. II, Tomo I. Brasilia: Ministerio do Meio Ambiente.
  • Peh KSH, Jong J, Sodhi NS, Lim SLH, Yap CAM. 2005. Lowland rainforest avifauna and human disturbance: persistence of primary forest birds in selectively logged forests and mixed-rural habitats of southern Peninsular Malaysia. Biol Conserv. 123:489-505.
  • Piha H. 2006. Impacts of agriculture on amphibians at multiple scales [academic dissertation]. [Finland]: University of Helsinki, Faculty of Bioscience.
  • Ponce VM, Nunes da Cunha C. 1993. Vegetated earthmounds in tropical savannas of Central Brazil: a synthesis: with special reference to the Pantanal at Mato Grosso. J Biogeogr. 20:219-225.
  • Prado CPA, Uetanabaro M, Haddad CFB. 2005. Breeding activity patterns, reproductive modes, and habitat use by anurans (Amphibia) in seasonal environment in the Pantanal, Brazil. Amphibia-Reptilia. 26:211-221.
  • Santos TG, Rossa-Feres DC, Casatti L. 2007. Diversidade e distribuicao espaco-temporal de anuros em regioes com pronunciada estacao seca no sudeste do Brasil. Iheringia Ser Zool. 97:37-49.
  • Stoate C, Boatman ND, Borralho RJ, Carvalho CR, Snoo GR, Eden P. 2001. Ecological impacts of arable intensification in Europe. J Environ Manag. 63:337-365.
  • Strussmann C, Ribeiro RAK, Ferreira VL, Beda AF. 2007. Herpetologia no Brasil II. Brasil: Sociedade Brasileira de Herpetologia, Belo Horizonte - MG. Chapter 3, Herpetofauna do Pantanal brasileiro; p. 66-84.
  • Tejeda-Cruz C, Sutherland WJ. 2004. Bird responses to shade coffee production. Anim Conserv. 7:169-179.
  • Tscharntke T, Klein AM, Kruess A, Steffan-Dewenter I, Thies C. 2005. Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity - ecosystem service management. Ecol Lett. 8:857-874.
  • Uetanabaro M, Prado CPA, Rodrigues DJ, Gordo M, Campos Z. 2008. Guia de campo dos anuros do Pantanal e planaltos de entorno. Campo Grande (MS): Editora UFMS.
  • Valerio-Brun LM. 2008. Riqueza e abundancia de anfibios (Amphibia-Anura), Pantanal de Pocone, Municipio de Bossa Senhora do Livramento, Mato Grosso, Brasil [academic dissertation]. [Cuiaba (MS)]: Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso.
  • Vasconcelos TS, Rossa-Feres DC. 2005. Diversidade, distribuicao espacial e temporal de anfibios anuros (Amphibia, Anura) na regiao noroeste do estado de Sao Paulo, Brasil. Biota Neotropica 5:67-75.
  • Zar JH. 1999. Biostatistical analysis. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Prentice Hall.