Biodiversity Literature Repository
Published November 30, 2012 | Version v1
Journal article Restricted

Population dynamics of tadpoles of Crossodactylus gaudichaudii (Anura: Hylodidae) in the Atlantic Rainforest of Ilha Grande, southeastern Brazil

Creators

Description

Almeida-Gomes, M., Laia, R.C., Hatano, F.H., Sluys, M. Van, Rocha, C.F.D. (2012): Population dynamics of tadpoles of Crossodactylus gaudichaudii (Anura: Hylodidae) in the Atlantic Rainforest of Ilha Grande, southeastern Brazil. Journal of Natural History 46 (43-44): 2725-2733, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2012.717643, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2012.717643

Files

Restricted

The record is publicly accessible, but files are restricted to users with access.

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:0E49FFF84C7E8F0D772CFF97BE319633

Related works

Has part
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5202251 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5202253 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5202255 (DOI)

References

  • Alford RA. 1999. Tadpoles: the biology of anuran larvae. Chicago (IL): The University of Chicago Press. R.W. McDiarmid and R. Altig. Chapter 10, Ecology: Resource use, competition and predation; p. 240-278.
  • Alho CJR, Schneider M, Vasconcellos, LA. 2002. Degree of threat to the biological diversity in the Ilha Grande State Park (RJ) and guidelines for conservation. Braz J Biol. 62(3):375-385.
  • Almeida-Gomes M, Van Sluys M,Rocha,CFD. 2007. Calling activity of Crossodactylus gaudichaudii (Anura: Hylodidae) in an Atlantic Rainforest area at Ilha Grande, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Belg J Zool. 137(2): 203-207.
  • Araujo D, Oliveira R. 1988. Reserva Biologica Estadual da Praia do Sul (Ilha Grande, Rio de Janeiro): lista preliminar da flora. Acta Bot Bras. 1:83-94.
  • Arnold SJ, Wassersug RJ. 1978. Differential predation on metamorphic anurans by garter snakes (Thamnophis): social behaviour as a possible defense. Ecology 59:1014-1022.
  • Azevedo-Ramos C, Van Sluys M, Hero JM, Magnusson WE. 1992. Influence of tadpole movement on predation by odonate naiads. J Herpetol. 26:335-338.
  • Becker CG, Fonseca CR, Haddad CFB, Batista RF, Prado PI. 2007. Habitat split and the global decline of amphibians. Science 318:1775-1777.
  • Donnelly MA, Guyer C. 1994. Patterns of reproduction and habitat use in an assemblage of Neotropical hylid frogs. Oecologia 98:291-302.
  • Downie JR, Livingstone SR, Cormack JR. 2001. Selection of tadpole deposition sites by male Trinidadian stream frogs, Mannophryne trinitatis (Dendrobatidae): an example of anti-predator behaviour. Herpetol J. 11:91-100.
  • Duellman WE. 1995. Temporal fluctuations in abundances of anuran amphibians in a seasonalAmazonian rainforest. J. Herpetol. 29:13-21.
  • Duellman WE, Trueb L. 1986. Biology of Amphibians. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill.
  • Eterovick PC, Barata IM. 2006. Distribution of tadpoles within and among Brazilian streams: the influence of predators, habitat size and heterogeneity. Herpetologica 62:367-79.
  • Eterovick PC, Lazarotti I, Franco BP, Dias CJ. 2010. Seasonal variation of tadpole spatial niches in permanent streams: The roles of predation risk and microhabitat availability. Austr Ecol. 35:879-887.
  • Fatorelli P, Costa PN, Laia RC, Almeida-Santos M, Sluys MV, Rocha CFD. 2010. Description, microhabitat and temporal distribution of the tadpole of Proceratophrys tupinamba Prado and Pombal, 2008. Zootaxa 2684:57-62.
  • Francioni E, Carcerelli LC. 1993. Descricao do girino de Crossodactylus gaudichaudii Dumeril and Bibron, 1841 (Anura, Leptodactylidae). Mem Inst Butantan 55:63-67.
  • Frost DR. Amphibian Species of the World: an Online Reference. Version 5.5. [Internet]. 2012. New York (NY): American Museum of Natural History; [cited 2012 Mar 08]. Available from: http://research.amnh.org/vz/herpetology/amphibia/
  • Gosner KL. 1960. A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica 16:183-190.
  • Gotelli NJ, Ellison AM. 2004. A Primer of Ecological Statistics. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates,.
  • Gottsberger B, Gruber E. 2004. Temporal partitioning of reproductive activity in a neotropical anuran community. J Trop Ecol. 20:271-280.
  • Haddad CFB, Prado CPA. 2005. Reproductive modes in frogs and their unexpected diversity in the Atlantic. BioScience 55(3):207-217.
  • Hartmann MT, Giasson LOM, Hartmann PA, Haddad CFB. 2005. Visual communication in Brazilian species of anurans from the Atlantic forest. J Nat Hist. 39:1675-1685.
  • Hatano FH., Rocha CFD, Van Sluys M. 2002. Environmental factors affecting calling activity of a tropical diurnal frog (Hylodes phyllodes: Leptodactylidae). J Herpetol. 36:314-318.
  • Heyer WR, Rand AS, Cruz CAG, Peixoto O, Nelson CE. 1990. Frogs of Boraceia. Arq Zool. 31:231-410.
  • Izecksohn E, Carvalho-e-Silva SP. 2010. Anfibios do municipio do Rio de Janeiro. 2nd ed. Rio de Janeiro: Editora UFRJ.
  • Iwai N, Pearson RG, Alford RA. 2009. Shredder-tadpole facilitation of leaf litter decomposition in a tropical stream. Freshwater Biol. 54:2573-2580.
  • Laia RC, Rocha CFD. 2012. Adults and tadpoles of species of Hylodidae (Anura): History and taxonomy perspectives. Zoologia 29:89-94.
  • Leite FSF, Pacheco BG, Eterovick PC. 2008. Development and demography of Phasmahyla jandaia (Bokermann and Sazima, 1978) (Anura, Hylidae) tadpoles in an Atlantic Forest site, southeastern Brazil. J Nat Hist. 42:2777-2791.
  • Loman J. 2002. When crowded tadpoles (Rana arvalis and R. temporaria) fail to metamorphose early and thus fail to escape drying ponds. Herpetol J. 12:21-28.
  • Loman J, Lardner B. 2006. Does pond quality limit frogs Rana arvalis and R. temporaria in agricultural landscapes? A field experiment J App Ecol. 43:690-700.
  • Mittermeier RA, Gil RP, Hoffman M, Pilgrim J, Brooks T, Mittermeier CG, Lamoreux J, Fonseca GAB. 2005. Hotspots revisited: earth's biologically richest and most endangered terrestrial ecoregions. 2nd. ed. Boston (MA): University of Chicago Press.
  • Oseen KL, Wassersug RJ. 2002. Environmental factors influencing calling in sympatric anurans. Oecologia 133:616-625.
  • Ranvestel AW, Lips KR, Pringle CM, Whiles MR, Bixby RJ. 2004. Neotropical tadpoles influence stream benthos: evidence for the ecological consequences of decline in amphibian populations. Freshwater Biol. 49:274-285.
  • Rocha CFD, Bergallo HG, Alves MAS, Van Sluys M. 2003. A Biodiversidade nos Grandes Remanescentes Florestais do Estado do Rio de Janeiro e nas Restingas dos Corredores da Mata Atlantica. Sao Carlos, Sao Paulo, Brazil: Rima Editora.
  • Villa J, McDiarmid RW, Gallardo JM. 1982. Arthropods predators of Leptodactylid frog foam nests. Brenesia 19/20:1-16.
  • Weygoldt P, Carvalho-e-Silva SP. 1992. Mating and oviposition in the Hylodine frog Crossodactylus gaudichaudii (Anura: Leptodactylidae). Amphibia-Reptilia 13:35-45.
  • Whittier JM, Crews D. 1987. Hormones and reproduction in fishes, amphibians and reptiles. New York: Plenum Press. D.O. Norris and R.E. Jones. Seasonal reproduction: patterns and control; p. 385-409.
  • Wogel H, Abrunhosa PA, Weber LN. 2004. The tadpole, vocalizations and visual displays of Hylodes nasus (Anura: Leptodactylidae). Amphibia-Reptilia 25:219-227.
  • Zar JH. 1999. Biostatistical analysis. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Prentice Hall, Inc.