Biodiversity Literature Repository
Published April 16, 2014 | Version v1
Journal article Restricted

Reproductive site selection in the leaf-frog Phyllomedusa azurea Cope, 1862 (Anura: Hylidae) in altered areas of the Brazilian Cerrado

Creators

  • 1. Laboratório de Herpetologia, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS, Brasil;
  • 2. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade Animal, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS, Brasil;
  • 3. Departamento de Morfologia e Fisiologia Animal, FCAV, Universidade Estadual Paulista 'Júlio de Mesquita Filho', Jaboticabal, SP, Brasil;
  • 4. Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS, Brasil

Description

Dias, Tailise Marques, Maragno, Franciéle Pereira, Prado, Cynthia P.A., Cechin, Sonia Zanini (2014): Reproductive site selection in the leaf-frog Phyllomedusa azurea Cope, 1862 (Anura: Hylidae) in altered areas of the Brazilian Cerrado. Journal of Natural History 48 (43-44): 2689-2699, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2014.896486, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2014.896486

Files

Restricted

The record is publicly accessible, but files are restricted to users with access.

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:FFD18155F37FFFCFFF94E2351C42FFE1

Related works

Has part
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5194556 (DOI)

References

  • Abrunhosa PA,Wogel H. 2004. Breeding behavior of the leaf-frog Phyllomedusa burmeisteri (Anura: Hylidae). Amphibia-Reptilia. 25:125-135.
  • Bagnara JT, Rastogi RK. 1992. Reproductive biology of South American vertebrates. New York: W.C. Hamlett. Chapter 7, Reproduction in the Mexican Leaf Frog, Pachymedusa dacnicolor; p. 98-111.
  • Bastos RP, Haddad CFB. 1996. Breeding activity of the neotropical treefrog Hyla elegans (Anura, Hylidae). J Herpetol. 30:355-360.
  • Bertoluci J, Rodrigues MT. 2002. Utilizacao de habitats reprodutivos e micro-habitats de vocalizacao em uma taxocenose de anuros (Amphibia) da Mata Atlantica do sudeste do Brasil. Pap Avulsos Zool. 42:287-297.
  • Caramaschi, U. 2006. Redefinicao do grupo de Phyllomedusa hypochondrialis, com redescricao de P. megacephala (Miranda-Ribeiro, 1926), revalidacao de P. azurea Cope, 1862 e descricao de uma nova especie (Amphibia, Anura, Hylidae). Arquiv Mus Nacl, Rio de Janeiro. 64:159-179.
  • Cardoso AJ, Andrade GV, Haddad CFB. 1989. Distribuicao espacial em comunidades de anfibios (Anura) no Sudeste do Brasil. Rev Bras Biol. 49:241-249.
  • Costa TB, Guimaraes LD, Bastos RP. 2010. Comportamento territorial e de acasalamento de Phyllomedusa azurea (Anura, Hylidae) em uma lagoa temporaria do centro-oeste do Brasil. Phyllomedusa. 9:99-108.
  • Crump ML. 1971. Quantitative analysis of the ecological distribution of a tropical herpetofauna. Occ Pap Mus Nat Hist Univ Kansas. 3:1-62.
  • Duellman WE, Trueb L. 1994. Biology of Amphibians. Maryland: John Hopkins University Press Baltimore.
  • EMBRAPA. 2012: Guia clima [Internet]. c1979-2013. Brasil: Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuaria; [cited 2013 Aug 8]. Available from: http://www.cpao.embrapa.br/clima/ index.php?pg=chuvams&cad=2&cidade=Nioaque&estacao=&intervalo=1
  • Faivovich J, Haddad CFB, Baeta D, Jungfer K, Alvares GFR, Brandao RA, Sheil C, Barrientos LS, Barrio-Amoros C, Cruz CAG, Wheeler WC. 2010. The phylogenetic relationships of the charismatic poster frogs, Phyllomedusinae (Anura, Hylidae). Cladistics. 26:227-261.
  • Freitas EB, De-Carvalho CB, Faria RG, Batista RC, Batista CC, Coelho WA, Bocchiglieri A. 2008. Nicho ecologico e aspectos da historia natural de Phyllomedusa azurea (Anura: Hylidae, Phyllomedusinae) no Cerrado do Brasil Central. Biota Neotrop. 8:101-110.
  • Frost DR. 2013. Amphibian Species of the World, 5.6. [Internet]. c1985-2013. New York; [cited 2013 Jan 9]. Available from: http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/index. html.
  • Haddad CFB, Prado CPA. 2005. Reproductive modes in frogs and their unexpected diversity in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil. Bioscience. 55:207-217.
  • Haramura T. 2008. Experimental test of spawning site selection by Buergeria japonica (Anura: Rhacophoridae) in response to salinity level. Copeia. 2008:64-67.
  • Howard RD. 1978. The influence of male-defended oviposition sites on early embryo mortality in bullfrogs. Ecol Soc Am. 59:789-798.
  • Kottek M, Grieser J, Beck C, Rudolf B, Rubel F. 2006. World map of the Koppen-Geiger climate classification updated. Meteorol Z. 15:259-263.
  • Krebs JR. 1982. Territorial defence in the great tit (Parus major): do residents always win?. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 11:185-194.
  • Michelsen A. 1978. Sensory ecology: review and perspectives. New York, NY: Plenum Press. Sound reception in different environments. 345-373.
  • Miranda DB, Garey MV, Monteiro-Filho ELA, Hartmann MT. 2008. Sinalizacao visual e biologia reprodutiva de Dendropsophus werneri (Anura: Hylidae) em area de Mata Atlantica no estado do Parana, Brasil. Pap Avulsos Zool. 48:335-343.
  • Nali RC, Prado CPA, 2012. Habitat use, reproductive traits and social interactions in a streamdweller treefrog endemic to the Brazilian Cerrado. Amphibia-Reptilia. 33:337-347.
  • Neckel-Oliveira S. 2004. Effects of landscape change on clutches of Phyllomedusa tarsius, a neotropical treefrog. Biol Conserv. 118:109-116.
  • Oliveira FFR, Nogueira PAG, Eterovick PC. 2012. Natural history of Phyllomedusa megacephala (Miranda-Ribeiro, 1926) (Anura: Hylidae) in Southeastern Brazil, with descriptions of its breeding biology and male territorial behaviour. J Nat Hist. 46:117-129.
  • Pombal Jr JP, Haddad CFB. 1992. Especies de Phyllomedusa do grupo burmeisteri do Brasil oriental, com descricao de uma especie nova (Amphibia, Hylidae). Rev Bras Biol. 52:217- 229.
  • Prado GM, Pombal Jr JP. 2005. Distribuicao espacial e temporal dos anuros em um brejo da Reserva Biologica de Duas Bocas, sudeste do Brasil. Arquiv Mus Nacl, Rio de Janeiro. 63:685-705.
  • Rodrigues DJ, Uetanabaro M, Lopes FS. 2007. Breeding biology of Phyllomedusa azurea Cope, 1862 and P. sauvagii Boulenger, 1882 (Anura) from the Cerrado, Central Brazil. J Nat Hist. 41:1841-1851.
  • Rudolf VHW, Rodel MO. 2005. Oviposition site selection in a complex and variable environment: the role of habitat quality and conspecific cues. Oecologia. 142:316-325.
  • Semlitsch RD. 2003. Amphibian conservation. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.
  • Shepard DB. 2004. Seasonal differences in aggression and site tenacity in male Green Frogs, Rana clamitans. Copeia. 2004:159-164.
  • Silva WR, Giaretta AA. 2008. Seleca o de sitios de oviposica o em anuros (Lissamphibia). Biota Neotrop. 8:243-248.
  • Vaira M. 2001. Breeding biology of the leaf frog, Phyllomedusa boliviana (Anura, Hylidae) . Amphibia-Reptilia. 22:421-429.
  • Wells KD. 1977. The social behaviour of anuran amphibians. Anim Behav. 25:666-693.
  • Wells KD, Schwartz JJ. 1982. The effect of vegetation on the propagation of calls in the Neotropical frog Centrolenella fleischmanni. Herpetologica. 38:449-455.
  • Whitney CL, Krebs JR. 1975. Spacing and calling in Pacific Tree Frogs, Hyla regilla. Can J Zool. 53:1519-1527.
  • Wogel H, Abrunhosa PA, Pombal Jr. JP. 2002. Atividade reprodutiva de Physalaemus signifer (Anura, Leptodactylidae) em ambiente temporario. Iheringia Ser Zool. 92:57-70.
  • Zar J. 1999. Biostatistical analysis. New Jersey, NJ: Prentice Hall.