Rebuttal of Taylor and Barrón-Ortiz 2021 Rethinking the evidence for early horse domestication at Botai
Authors/Creators
- 1. University of Exeter
- 2. University of Edinburgh
- 3. University of Bristol
- 4. Université Paul Sabatier
- 5. Al-Farabi Kazakh National University
Description
Taylor and Barrón-Ortiz (2021) present a reconsideration of the evidence for early horse husbandry in the Eneolithic Botai Culture of Northern Kazakhstan. However, their critique misrepresents key methodologies applied in the original analyses, demonstrates fundamental scientific misunderstanding of the stable isotopic evidence, omits key details about recent proteomic evidence and underplays or ignores a raft of other evidential lines. This rebuttal paper addresses these points. Additionally, the only primary evidence presented in Taylor and Barrón-Ortiz (2021), relating tooth wear patterns in North American wild horses, if correctly presented, adds more empirical weight to the conclusion that Botai-type wear patterns are only seen in bitted animals.
Files
Outram et al Rebuttal of Taylor.pdf
Files
(440.9 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:d237e213026bc1c47236d35cd53b363b
|
440.9 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Related works
- Cites
- Journal article: 10.1126/science.1168594 (DOI)
- Journal article: 10.1126/science.aao3297 (DOI)
- Journal article: 10.1016/j.jas.2006.09.010 (DOI)
- Reviews
- Journal article: 10.1038/s41598-021-86832-9 (DOI)