Published May 7, 2014 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Liloa curta

  • 1. Phylogenetic Systematics and Evolution Research Group, Natural History Collections, University Museum of Bergen, University of Bergen, PB 7800, 5020 - Bergen Norway
  • 2. Affiliated to: Marine Laboratory, University of Guam, Mangilao, GU 96923

Description

Liloa curta (Adams, 1850)

Bulla curta Adams, 1850: 582, pl. 124, fig. 100.

Haminea curta — Pilsbry 1895: 368, pl. 40, figs 84, 85.

Haminea curta tomaculum Pilsbry, 1917: 219, fig. 10.

Haminoea curta — Pilsbry 1921: 369, fig. 8a. Kay 1979: 427: fig. 137 I.

Haminoea tomaculum — Pilsbry, 1921: 370.

Haminoea (Liloa) curta — Pilsbry 1921: 369, fig. 8a.

Liloa curta — Habe 1952: 151, pl. 21, fig. 19. Qi 2004: 147, pl. 83, fig. N.

Atys curta — Gosliner et al. 2008: 23.

Type locality. Indo-Pacific (not specified in the original description).

Material examined. Guam, UF 374131, H = 15 mm; the Philippines, 1 shell examined, MNHN, Paris (S12/ OT 575), H = 3.1 mm; the Philippines, 5 spcs dissected, MNHN, Paris (S12/ OT 575), H = 3.4–7.5 mm; the Philippines, 2 spcs dissected, MNHN, Paris (S5/ OT 392), H = 5.4 mm, 6 mm.

Animal (Fig. 1J): Body whitish-translucent, pinkish dots scattered over the body, more dense between eyes and mid part (between mouth and eyes) of cephalic shield; white and red blotches scattered on mantle; eyes visible.

Shell (Figs 3D, 17A–C): Maximum height 18 mm; whitish; thin and fragile, translucent, cylindrically oval, sides slightly convex only, anterior end slightly rounded, posterior end truncated; spire sunken, aperture broad, outer lip thin, base semi-circular; spiral grooves covering entire shell, distance between spiral grooves almost equal, faint irregular axial lines present.

Jaws (Fig. 17D): Present, crescent shape, jaw rodlets with 7–10 denticles.

Radula (Figs 17E, F): Radular formula at mid-point 19–25 x 8–7.1.7–8; median tooth with broad base, large triangular central cusp, small triangular lateral cusps; outer lateral teeth hook-shaped, slender, base with semicircular projection outwardly, groove along the outer margin, size decreases outwardly. Inner-lateral teeth not distinct.

Gizzard plates (Figs 17G, H): Three gizzard plates; widest in the middle, narrower towards both ends, 27–42 ridges, single rows of rods with pointed tips along top edge of ridges, both anterior and posterior sides of ridges covered densely by tiny rods with pointed tips.

Male reproductive system (Fig. 17I): Total length 2.5 mm (H = 7.5 mm). Formed by three parts: prostate, seminal ducts and penial region; prostate oval-rounded, bilobed, proximal lobe narrower, opaque-yellowish, faint striations sometimes present, distal lobe light-brownish; translucent pouch connects to the prostate, light-yellowish mass observed within, pouch opens to two seminal ducts, first seminal duct translucent, with hook-like posterior end, second seminal duct broad and short, translucent, connects to the penial region; penial region elongated, translucent, with opaque inner duct visible.

Ecology. Sandy bottom in shallow water (Qi 2004; Gosliner et al. 2008; present study).

Geographical distribution. Red Sea, Malaysia, the Philippines, China, Japan, Papua New Guinea, Guam, New Caledonia, Hawaii (Habe 1952; Qi 2004; Gosliner et al. 2008; present study).

Remarks. Pilsbry (1917) named a shell that was identical but narrower than Liloa curta as Haminea curta tomaculum. Later, Pilsbry (1921) considered that both “ curta ” and “ tomaculum ” deserved species status. Additionally, Pilsbry (1921) described Haminea olopana, based on a shell that was more convex than Haminea curta and Haminea tomaculum and with spiral grooves more distantly spaced at the centre and placed all three species in the new subgenus Liloa. Kay (1979) synonymised these species under the name Haminoea curta. However, the original description of H. olopana fits Liloa porcellana (Gould, 1859), which possess a cylindrical and translucent shell, with spiral grooves more visible at both ends, arched callus at the end of columella and the anterior end of the shell subtruncated.

The species Liloa curta has been either ascribed to the genus Liloa (e.g. Habe 1952; Qi 2004) or to the genus Atys (e.g. Gosliner et al. 2008). However, this species possesses both shell and anatomical features that are different from the type species Atys naucum. Liloa curta has unique gizzard plates, which have 27–42 ridges, with pointed rods along the top edge and smaller pointed rods densely covering both anterior and posterior sides of ridges. The male reproductive system of this species is also different from other haminoeids. It possesses two seminal ducts interconnected at the entrance of a translucent pouch showing a yellowish mass content. The first seminal duct has a hook-like posterior end, which might be a synapomorphy of the genus Liloa.

Notes

Published as part of Too, Chin Chin, Carlson, Clay, Hoff, Patty Jo & Malaquias, Manuel António E., 2014, Diversity and systematics of Haminoeidae gastropods (Heterobranchia: Cephalaspidea) in the tropical West Pacific Ocean: new data on the genera Aliculastrum, Atys, Diniatys and Liloa, pp. 355-392 in Zootaxa 3794 (3) on pages 383-385, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3794.3.3, http://zenodo.org/record/4914927

Files

Files (5.4 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:de716930ab7e1dc6a1a5b015369b0f3b
5.4 kB Download

System files (39.9 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:4184e813d12f12efee23ac3cb75a5d79
39.9 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Family
Haminoeidae
Genus
Liloa
Kingdom
Animalia
Order
Cephalaspidea
Phylum
Mollusca
Scientific name authorship
Adams
Species
curta
Taxon rank
species
Taxonomic concept label
Liloa curta (Adams, 1850) sec. Too, Carlson, Hoff & Malaquias, 2014

References

  • Adams, A. (1850) Monograph of the family Bullidae. In: Sowerby, G. B. II. (Ed.), Thesaurus Conchyliorum, or Monographs of genera of shells. Vol. 2. Sowerby, 70, Great Russell Street, Bloomsbury, London, pp. 553 - 608.
  • Pilsbry, H. A. (1895) Manual of Conchology, structural and systematic. Vol. 15. Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, 436 pp.
  • Pilsbry, H. A. (1917) Marine Mollusks of Hawaii, I- III (Plate XIV, XV). Proceedings of The Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 69, 207 - 230.
  • Pilsbry, H. A. (1921) Marine mollusks of Hawaii: XIV, XV. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 72 (3), 360 - 382.
  • Kay, E. A. (1979) Hawaiian Marine Shells. Reef and Shore Fauna of Hawaii. Section 4: Mollusca. Bernice P. Bishop Museum Special Publications, Hawaii, pp. 1 - 653.
  • Habe, T. (1952) Atyidae in Japan. In: Kuroda, T., (Ed.), Illustrated Catalogue of Japanese shells, 20, pp. 137 - 152.
  • Qi, Z. Y. (2004) Seashells of China. China Ocean Press, Beijing, 418 pp.
  • Gosliner, T. M., Behrens, D. W. & Valdes, A. (2008) Indo-Pacific Nudibranchs and sea slugs: A field guide to the World's most diverse fauna. Sea Challengers Natural History Books, US, 426 pp.
  • Gould, A. A. (1859) Description of new species of shells brought home by the North Pacific Exploring Expedition. Proceedings of the Boston Society of Natural History, 7, 138 - 143.