Info: Zenodo’s user support line is staffed on regular business days between Dec 23 and Jan 5. Response times may be slightly longer than normal.

Published July 1, 2021 | Version 1
Journal article Open

The existential stakes of platform governance: a critical literature review

  • 1. JOLT-ETN / LERASS, University Paul Sabatier - Toulouse III, Toulouse, France

Description

This study introduces a comprehensive overview of literature concerning the concepts of regulation and governance, and attempts to connect them to scholarly works that deal with the governance of and by social media platforms. The paper provides fundamental definitions of regulation and governance, along with a critique of polycentricity or multi-stakeholderism, in order to contextualise the discussion around platform governance and, subsequently, online content regulation. Moreover, where traditional governance literature conceptualised stakeholders as a triangle, this article proposes going beyond the triad of public, private and non-governmental actors, to account for previously invisible stakeholder clusters, like citizens and news media organisations. This paper also contends that, while platform governance is an important field of study and practice, the way it has been structured and investigated so far, is posing an existential risk to the broader internet governance structure, primarily, because of the danger of conflating the internet with platforms. As a result, there exists a timely need to reimagine the way in which we understand and study phenomena related to platform governance by adjusting our conceptual and analytical heuristics. So, this article wishes to expand the theorisation of this field in order to better engage with complicated platform governance issues, like the development of regulatory frameworks concerning online content regulation.

Files

openreseurope-1-14946.pdf

Files (1.3 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:be61dd142b64fa3053366f5c7fdd6eb4
1.3 MB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • Abbott KW, Snidal D (2009). The Governance Triangle: Regulatory Standards Institutions and The Shadow of the State.
  • Beresford AD (2003). Foucault's Theory Of Governance And The Deterrence Of Internet Fraud. Admin Soc. doi:10.1177/0095399702250347
  • Bernstein S, Cashore B (2007). Can non‐state global governance be legitimate? An analytical framework. Regul Gov. doi:10.1111/j.1748-5991.2007.00021.x
  • Bietti E (2020). Consent as a Free Pass: Platform Power and the Limits of the Informational Turn. Pace Law Review.
  • Black J (2002). Critical Reflections on Regulation. Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy.
  • Black J (2008). Constructing and contesting legitimacy and accountability in polycentric regulatory regimes. Regul Gov. doi:10.1111/j.1748-5991.2008.00034.x
  • Bostoen F (2018). Neutrality, fairness or freedom? Principles for platform regulation. doi:10.14763/2018.1.785
  • Braithwaite J (2008). Regulatory capitalism: How it works, ideas for making it work better.
  • Braithwaite J (2011). The Regulatory State?. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199604456.013.0011
  • Braithwaite J, Coglianese C, Levi-Faur D (2007). Can regulation and governance make a difference?. Regulation & Governance. doi:10.1111/j.1748-5991.2007.00006.x
  • Brousseau E, Marzouki M, Méadel C (2012). Governance, regulations and powers on the Internet.
  • Bucher T, Helmond A (2018). The Affordances of Social Media Platforms. doi:10.4135/9781473984066.n14
  • Bulmer SJ (1998). New institutionalism and the governance of the Single European Market. Journal of European Public Policy. doi:10.1080/135017698343875
  • Büthe T, Mattli W (2011). The New Global Rulers: The Privatization of Regulation in the World Economy.
  • Cammaerts B, Mansell R (2019). Platform policy and regulation: Towards a radical democratic turn.
  • Caplan R, Clark M, Partin W (2020). Against Platform Determinism: A Critical Orientation. Medium.
  • Caplan R, Gillespie T (2020). Tiered Governance and Demonetization: The Shifting Terms of Labor and Compensation in the Platform Economy. Social Media + Society. doi:10.1177/2056305120936636
  • Carr M (2015). Power Plays in Global Internet Governance. J Int Stud. doi:10.1177/0305829814562655
  • Davis M (2020). The online anti-public sphere. Eur J Cult Stud. doi:10.1177/1367549420902799
  • DeNardis L (2010). The Emerging Field of Internet Governance. Yale Law School.
  • DeNardis L (2020). Introduction: Internet Governance as an Object of Research Inquiry. doi:10.7551/mitpress/12400.003.0002
  • Douek E (2019). Self-Regulation of Content Moderation as an Answer to the Special Problems of Speech Regulation. Stanford University,.
  • Douek E (2021). Governing Online Speech: From 'Posts-as-trumps' to proportionality and probability. Forthcoming. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3679607
  • Drahos P, Krygier M (2017). Regulation, institutions and networks. doi:10.22459/RT.02.2017.01
  • Fan J, Zhang AX (2020). Digital Juries: A Civics-Oriented Approach to Platform Governance. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. doi:10.1145/3313831.3376293
  • Flew T, Gillett R, Martin F (2021). Return of the regulatory state: A stakeholder analysis of Australia's Digital Platforms Inquiry and online news policy. The Information Society. doi:10.1080/01972243.2020.1870597
  • Flew T, Lim T (2019). Assessing Policy I: Stakeholder Analysis. The Palgrave Handbook of Methods for Media Policy Research. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-16065-4
  • Flew T, Martin F, Suzor N (2019). Internet regulation as media policy: Rethinking the question of digital communication platform governance. International Journal of Digital Television. doi:10.1386/jdmp.10.1.33_1
  • Flyvbjerg B (1998). Habermas and Foucault: Thinkers for Civil Society?. Br J Sociol. doi:10.2307/591310
  • Foucault M (1978). The History of Sexuality, Volume I: An Introduction.
  • Foucault M, Burchell G, Gordon C (1991). The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality: with two lectures by and an interview with Michel Foucault.
  • Gillespie T (2018). Custodians of the internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media.
  • Gillespie T (2010). The politics of 'platforms'. New Media Soc. doi:10.1177/1461444809342738
  • Gjaltema J, Biesbroek R, Termeer K (2020). From government to governance…to meta-governance: A systematic literature review. Public Manag Rev. doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1648697
  • Gordon C (1991). Governmental Rationality: An Introduction.
  • Gorwa R (2019a). The platform governance triangle: Conceptualising the informal regulation of online content. Internet Policy Review. doi:10.14763/2019.2.1407
  • Gorwa R (2019b). What is platform governance?. Information, Communication & Society. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2019.1573914
  • Habermas J (1992). "L'espace public", 30 ans après. Quaderni. doi:10.3406/quad.1992.977
  • Haggart B (2020). Global platform governance and the internet-governance impossibility theorem. Journal of Digital Media & Policy. doi:10.1386/jdmp_00028_1
  • Haggart B, Keller CI (2021). Democratic legitimacy in global platform governance. Telecommunications Policy. doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102152
  • Helberger N (2020). The Political Power of Platforms: How Current Attempts to Regulate Misinformation Amplify Opinion Power. Digital J. doi:10.1080/21670811.2020.1773888
  • Helmond A (2015). The Platformization of the Web: Making Web Data Platform Ready. Social Media + Society. doi:10.1177/2056305115603080
  • Héritier A (2002). New Modes of Governance in Europe: Policy-Making without Legislating?. SSRN Electronic Journal.
  • Hirsch DD (2013). The Law and Policy of Online Privacy: Regulation, Self-Regulation, or Co-Regulation?.
  • Hofmann J (2020). The Multistakeholder Concept as Narrative: A Discourse Analytical Approach. doi:10.7551/mitpress/12400.003.0013
  • Hofmann J, Katzenbach C, Gollatz K (2017). Between coordination and regulation: Finding the governance in Internet governance. New Media Soc. doi:10.1177/1461444816639975
  • Kjaer PF, Vetterlein A (2018). Regulatory governance: Rules, resistance and responsibility. Contemp Polit. doi:10.1080/13569775.2018.1452527
  • Kooiman J (2003). Governing as governance. doi:10.4135/9781446215012
  • Koop C, Lodge M (2015). What is regulation? An interdisciplinary concept analysis. Regul Gov. doi:10.1111/rego.12094
  • Land MK (2019). Regulating Private Harms Online: Content Regulation under Human Rights Law. doi:10.7551/mitpress/11304.003.0018
  • Levi-Faur D (2011). Handbook on the Politics of Regulation.
  • Majone G (1994). The rise of the regulatory state in Europe. West Eur Polit. doi:10.1080/01402389408425031
  • Marsden CT (2011). Internet Co-Regulation. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511763410
  • Marx A (2011). Global governance and the certification revolution: Types, trends and challenges. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1764563
  • Mattli W, Woods N (2009). The politics of global regulation.
  • Mazzucato M (2014). The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths.
  • Mazzucato M, Entsminger J, Kattel R (2020). Public Value and Platform Governance. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3741641
  • Napoli PM (2015). Social media and the public interest: Governance of news platforms in the realm of individual and algorithmic gatekeepers. Telecommun Policy. doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2014.12.003
  • Offe C (2009). Governance: An "Empty Signifier"?. Constellations. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8675.2009.00570.x
  • Palladino N, Santaniello M (2021). Legitimacy, Power, and Inequalities in the Multistakeholder Internet Governance: Analyzing IANA Transition. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-56131-4
  • Papacharissi Z (2002). The virtual sphere: The internet as a public sphere. New Media Soc. doi:10.1177/14614440222226244
  • Puppis M (2010). Media Governance: A New Concept for the Analysis of Media Policy and Regulation. Communication, Culture & Critique. doi:10.1111/j.1753-9137.2010.01063.x
  • Regilme SSF (2018). Habermasian Thinking on Civil Society and the Public Sphere in the Age of Globalization. Perspectives on Political Science. doi:10.1080/10457097.2016.1175805
  • Rhodes RAW (1996). The New Governance: Governing without Government. Political Studies. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb01747.x
  • Rosenau J (1992). Governance, order, and change in world politics. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511521775.003
  • Salikov A (2018). Hannah Arendt, Jürgen Habermas, and Rethinking the Public Sphere in the Age of Social Media. Sotsiologicheskoe Obozrenie / Russian Sociological Review. doi:10.17323/1728-192x-2018-4-88-102
  • Smyrnaios N, Rebillard F (2019). How infomediation platforms took over the news: A longitudinal perspective. The Political Economy of Communication.
  • Stigler GJ (1971). The Theory of Economic Regulation. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science. doi:10.2307/3003160
  • Stoker G (1998). Governance as theory: Five propositions. International Social Science Journal. doi:10.1111/1468-2451.00106
  • Suzor NP (2019). Lawless: The secret rules that govern our digital lives. doi:10.1017/9781108666428
  • Tjahja N, Meyer T, Shahin J (2021). What is civil society and who represents civil society at the IGF? An analysis of civil society typologies in internet governance. Telecomm Policy. doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102141
  • ten Oever N (2020). Wired Norms: Inscription, resistance, and subversion in the governance of the Internet infrastructure.
  • van Dijck J, Poell T, de Waal M (2018). The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connective World.