Published July 15, 2019 | Version v1
Dataset Open

Data from: Heterozygosity at neutral and immune loci is not associated with neonatal mortality due to microbial infection in Antarctic fur seals

Description

Numerous studies have reported correlations between the heterozygosity of genetic markers and fitness. These heterozygosity fitness correlations (HFCs) play a central role in evolutionary and conservation biology, yet their mechanistic basis remains open to debate. For example, fitness associations have been widely reported at both neutral and functional loci, yet few studies have directly compared the two, making it difficult to gauge the relative contributions of genome-wide inbreeding and functional genetic variation to fitness. Here, we compared the effects of neutral and immune gene heterozygosity on death from bacterial infection in Antarctic fur seal (Arctocephalus gazella) pups. We specifically developed a panel of 13 microsatellites from expressed immune genes and genotyped these together with 48 neutral loci in 234 individuals, comprising 39 pups that were classified at necropsy as having most likely died of bacterial infection together with a five times larger matched sample of healthy surviving pups. Identity disequilibrium quantified from the neutral markers was positive and significant, indicative of variance in inbreeding within the study population. However, multilocus heterozygosity did not differ significantly between healthy and infected pups at either class of marker, and little evidence was found for fitness associations at individual loci. These results support a previous study of Antarctic fur seals that found no effects of heterozygosity at nine neutral microsatellites on neonatal survival, and thereby help to refine our understanding of how HFCs vary across the life cycle. Given that non-significant HFCs are underreported in the literature, we also hope that our study will contribute towards a more balanced understanding of the wider importance of this phenomenon.

Notes

Files

arc_gaz_transcriptome_annotations.txt

Files (29.3 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:0f8b94f0962655bd77f4d01ecbe4d2ce
107.5 kB Download
md5:f234611a9dcf8db2c7af394aea7491f2
5.7 kB Download
md5:27bf433bd204bf9b182d1c651233955f
27.4 MB Preview Download
md5:b357ef5c6f0306c095bfbb001fb30929
209.8 kB Download
md5:8f292830757e09a935e2c18ffad3f425
289.7 kB Preview Download
md5:c8d3f84a410f46d4d8b03a268e313e35
205 Bytes Download
md5:b90175f6f874c5c5e594aabff8706057
8.8 kB Download
md5:709d91358118db8e19e89094f2b6d251
430 Bytes Preview Download
md5:f7d975a0df8ac28781c55b01acdc39a5
791 Bytes Download
md5:d6fb71a3d0fb4011b004e111ba5446ab
483.1 kB Preview Download
md5:b9cd1536926673cd351fd18dcbe9e824
37.8 kB Download
md5:7660c4cf12efcf8262a75afba9127e10
175.5 kB Preview Download
md5:0431aab5a73edade06ea6a073343125f
11.7 kB Preview Download
md5:965a096476c77d8d4f9aab84e1047456
17.8 kB Download
md5:3d1e7cf14d8e2c3721c4a5fe2b8d838d
50.9 kB Download
md5:7d1dcb88545c0d0541851cc9d7b07975
513.4 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Related works

Is cited by
10.1002/ece3.5317 (DOI)