Dryad
Published January 30, 2020 | Version v1
Dataset Open

An empirical evaluation of camera trap study design: how many, how long, and when?

Authors/Creators

  • 1. North Carolina State University
  • 2. University of North Carolina Wilmington
  • 3. The Nature Conservancy
  • 4. Duke University
  • 5. University of Suffolk
  • 6. Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador
  • 7. Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute
  • 8. Zhejiang University
  • 9. Autonomous University of San Luis Potosí
  • 10. National Institute of Amazonian Research
  • 11. University of Montana
  • 12. Wageningen University & Research
  • 13. Francis Marion University
  • 14. Federal University of Western Pará
  • 15. Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi
  • 16. North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences
  • 17. Norwegian University of Life Sciences
  • 18. East China Normal University

Description

1. Camera traps deployed in grids or stratified random designs are a well-established survey tool for wildlife but there has been little evaluation of study design parameters. 2. We used an empirical subsampling approach involving 2225 camera deployments run at 41 study areas around the world to evaluate three aspects of camera trap study design (number of sites, duration and season of sampling) and their influence on the estimation of three ecological metrics (species richness, occupancy, detection rate) for mammals. 3. We found that 25-35 camera locations were needed for precise estimates of species richness, depending on scale of the study. The precision of species-level estimates of occupancy was highly sensitive to occupancy level, with <20 camera sites needed for precise estimates of common (>0.75) species, but more than 150 sites likely needed for rare (<0.25) species. Species detection rates were more difficult to estimate precisely at the grid level due to spatial heterogeneity, presumably driven by unaccounted for habitat variability within the study area. Running a camera at a site for 2 weeks was most efficient for detecting new species, but 3-4 weeks were needed for precise estimates of local detection rate, with no gains in precision observed after 1 month. Metrics for all mammal communities were sensitive to seasonality, with 37-50% of the species at the sites we examined fluctuating significantly in their occupancy or detection rates over the year. This effect was more pronounced in temperate sites, where seasonally sensitive species varied in relative abundance by an average factor of 4-5, and some species were completely absent in one season due to hibernation or migration. 4. We recommend the following guidelines to efficiently obtain precise estimates of species richness, occupancy and detection rates with camera trap arrays: run each camera for 3-5 weeks across 40-60 sites per array. We recommend comparisons of detection rates be model-based and include local covariates to help account for small-scale variation. Furthermore, comparisons across study areas or times must account for seasonality, which had strong impacts on mammal communities in both tropical and temperate sites.

Notes

For this paper we wanted to asess the importance of three things to camera trap study design: amount of locations surveyed (spatial), amount of time each survey ran (temporal), and rather season mattered (seasonal).  We broke into three teams to analyze these data, and used three slightly different collections of data for each team.  Thus, you will find three datasets labeled as to which analyses they were part of: spatial, temporal, or seasonal. 

All data is presented as raw detection data, giving the date, time, and species for each time photograph was recorded.  These are organized as 'deployments' representing a time period a camera was placed in a given location.  

We are including a TXT file with the Data Dictionary from eMammal that describes all the standard fields.  A few files have additional fields we added that should be self explanatory.

Files

seasonal.zip

Files (266.8 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:c4c6c3245901fc9390ad87c7971af44d
6.2 kB Download
md5:6cea577e180530d05b697330fb3bd56c
432.1 kB Preview Download
md5:08c409ed7a324701e2c8067369c7576d
265.0 MB Preview Download
md5:55490306d869d09d60f501a018c63760
962.4 kB Preview Download
md5:3292a648e268c531f63a00d47a40375e
395.3 kB Preview Download