Info: Zenodo’s user support line is staffed on regular business days between Dec 23 and Jan 5. Response times may be slightly longer than normal.

Published December 15, 2016 | Version v1
Dataset Open

Data from: One foot out the door: limb function during swimming in terrestrial versus aquatic turtles

Description

Specialization for a new habitat often entails a cost to performance in the ancestral habitat. Although aquatic lifestyles are ancestral among extant cryptodiran turtles, multiple lineages, including tortoises (Testudinidae) and emydid box turtles (genus Terrapene), independently specialized for terrestrial habitats. To what extent is swimming function retained in such lineages despite terrestrial specialization? Because tortoises diverged from other turtles over 50 Ma, but box turtles did so only 5 Ma, we hypothesized that swimming kinematics for box turtles would more closely resemble those of aquatic relatives than those of tortoises. To test this prediction, we compared high-speed video of swimming Russian tortoises (Testudo horsfieldii), box turtles (Terrapene carolina) and two semi-aquatic emydid species: sliders (Trachemys scripta) and painted turtles (Chrysemys picta). We identified different kinematic patterns between limbs. In the forelimb, box turtle strokes most resemble those of tortoises; for the hindlimb, box turtles are more similar to semi-aquatic species. Such patterns indicate functional convergence of the forelimb of terrestrial species, whereas the box turtle hindlimb exhibits greater retention of ancestral swimming motions.

Notes

Files

4spp_forelimbkinematicvars_forR.csv

Files (1.5 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:7d69d22768d6562732dbe73145538c6d
6.0 kB Preview Download
md5:7dcc444510a45839148890125894aa6e
12.2 kB Preview Download
md5:38ef953d1f652bfd9d50e123ce8d4f4b
1.2 MB Download
md5:a0f3d0e6cfd591da21dd3163931267fd
256.7 kB Download

Additional details

Related works

Is cited by
10.1098/rsbl.2016.0732 (DOI)