Published September 27, 2018 | Version v1
Dataset Open

Data from: Is environmental legislation conserving tropical stream faunas? a large-scale assessment of local, riparian and catchment-scale influences on Amazonian stream fish

  • 1. Federal University of Lavras
  • 2. Lancaster University
  • 3. Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi
  • 4. Oregon State University
  • 5. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
  • 6. University of Canberra
  • 7. Environmental Protection Agency
  • 8. University of Sao Paulo
  • 9. National Institute of Amazonian Research
  • 10. Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso
  • 11. Federal University of Amazonas
  • 12. Stockholm Environment Institute

Description

1.Agricultural expansion and intensification are major threats to tropical biodiversity. In addition to the direct removal of native vegetation, agricultural expansion often elicits other human-induced disturbances, many of which are poorly addressed by existing environmental legislation and conservation programmes. This is particularly true for tropical freshwater systems, where there is considerable uncertainty about whether a legislative focus on protecting riparian vegetation is sufficient to conserve stream fauna. 2.To assess the extent to which stream fish are being effectively conserved in agricultural landscapes, we examined the spatial distribution of assemblages in river basins to identify the relative importance of human impacts at instream, riparian, and catchment scales, in shaping observed patterns. We used an extensive dataset on the ecological condition of 83 low-order streams distributed in three river basins in the eastern Brazilian Amazon. 3.We collected and identified 24,420 individual fish from 134 species. Multiplicative diversity partitioning revealed high levels of compositional dissimilarity (DS) among stream sites (DS = 0.74 to 0.83) and river basins (DS = 0.82), due mainly to turnover (77.8 to 81.8%) rather than nestedness. The highly heterogeneous fish faunas in small Amazonian streams underscore the vital importance of enacting measures to protect forests on private lands outside of public protected areas. 4.Instream habitat features explained more variability in fish assemblages (15-19%) than riparian (2-12%), catchment (4-13%) or natural covariates (4-11%). Although grouping species into functional guilds allowed us to explain up to 31% of their abundance (i.e. for nektonic herbivores), individual riparian- and catchment-scale predictor variables that are commonly a focus of environmental legislation explained very little of the observed variation (partial R2 values mostly < 5%). 5.Policy implications. Current rates of agricultural intensification and mechanisation in tropical landscapes are unprecedented, yet the existing legislative frameworks focusing on protecting riparian vegetation seem insufficient to conserve stream environments and their fish assemblages. To safeguard the species-rich freshwater biota of small Amazonian streams, conservation actions must shift towards managing whole basins and drainage networks, as well as agricultural practices in already-cleared land.

Notes

Files

Files (519.7 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:ff8e0c5f1ab8a150e49d4210b60e3951
82.0 kB Download
md5:c6a2808168f67b152aa105df082a77f1
437.7 kB Download

Additional details

Related works

Is cited by
10.1111/1365-2664.13028 (DOI)