Planned intervention: On Thursday 19/09 between 05:30-06:30 (UTC), Zenodo will be unavailable because of a scheduled upgrade in our storage cluster.
Published March 3, 2014 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Raoulia galea Ng & Rahayu 2014, sp. nov.

Description

Raoulia galea sp. nov.

(Figs. 5E, 18, 19F–L)

Material examined. Holotype: male (9.4 × 7.4 mm) (ZRC 2000.0980), intertidal mud flats, Phuket, Thailand, coll. P.K.L. Ng, 3–6 May 2000.

Diagnosis. Carapace width 1.3 times length (Fig. 18A). Junction between frontal, supraorbital margins appears gently curved in frontal view (Fig. 18C). Third maxilliped merus shorter than ischium; ischium quadrangular, 1.1 times as long as broad (Figs. 5E, 19G). Ambulatory legs short; merus of last ambulatory leg 2.8 times as long as broad (Fig. 18A). G1 with distal half distinctly curving towards abdomen in situ, distal part gradually tapering (Fig. 19H–K).

Colour. The freshly collected specimen has a dirty white carapace and pereopods, with the setae brown.

Etymology. The name is derived from Latin galea for helmet, alluding to the general shape of the carapace of the species. The name is used as a noun in apposition.

Remarks. Raoulia galea sp. nov. is most similar to R. limosa, but it can be separated by possessing a somewhat a more quadrate carapace (Fig. 18; Figs. 13A, 14A, 15A for R. limosa); the junction between the frontal and supraorbital margins of R. galea is gently curved (in frontal view) (Fig. 18C) (at right angles in R. limosa; Fig. 13D, 14C); the merus of the third maxilliped is more subovate, with the anterolateral margin gently convex (Figs. 5E, 19G) (more rounded, with the anterolateral margin markedly convex in R. limosa; Figs. 5C, 16B). The G1s of the two species are superficially similar, but in R. galea sp. nov., the distal half curves towards the abdomen (i.e. directed ventrally) in situ (Fig. 19H–K), while in R. limosa, it is bent outwards (Fig. 16D–G). This argues against the two species being conspecific.

Although R. galea sp. nov. is also found in the Indian Ocean like R. piroculata, its carapace appears more rounded in general appearance (Fig. 18A; Fig. 17A for R. piroculata).

Distribution. Phuket, Andaman Sea coast of Thailand, eastern Indian Ocean; intertidal.

Notes

Published as part of Ng, Peter K. L. & Rahayu, Dwi Listyo, 2014, Revision of the family Acidopsidae Števčić, 2005, and the systematic position of Typhlocarcinodes Alcock, 1900, Caecopilumnus Borradaile, 1902, and Raoulia Ng, 1987, with descriptions of two new genera and five new species (Crustacea: Brachyura: Goneplacoidea), pp. 1-63 in Zootaxa 3773 (1) on page 31, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3773.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4909796

Files

Files (2.6 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:fa8cf61604b7aebe5666289d5ac9beda
2.6 kB Download

System files (33.3 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:2bcebf0481ea3ebf590aa97c7f051e2b
33.3 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Collection code
ZRC
Event date
2000-05-03
Family
Chasmocarcinidae
Genus
Raoulia
Kingdom
Animalia
Material sample ID
ZRC 2000.0980
Order
Decapoda
Phylum
Arthropoda
Scientific name authorship
Ng & Rahayu
Species
galea
Taxonomic status
sp. nov.
Taxon rank
species
Type status
holotype
Verbatim event date
2000-05-03/06
Taxonomic concept label
Raoulia galea Ng & Rahayu, 2014