Parole- The Reformative Instrument of Punishment in Prisonization
Description
Parole is a social control weapon to the implementation of the reformative or the rehabilitative measures, through which the” humanity” aspect; even towards the criminals is reflected. Prisonisation symbolizes a system of punishment and also a sort of institutional placement of undertrials and suspects during the period of trial. To deal with the criminals, prisons are established; in which the aspect, scope, and ambit of” punishment” prove or can be stated as one of the pivotal instruments or weapons or machinery to treat the criminals. The parole system in the Indian Prison Administration is an agency to transform our prisons into rehabilitative institutions wherein the prisoners are treated humanely and wherein one’s personality is nurtured and is trained to transform oneself from a criminal into a responsible citizen of our country. Parole is an integral part of the correctional process. It is a kind of consideration granted to the prisoners to help them to come back into the mainstream of life. It is nothing but an instrument of social rehabilitation of the prisoner. The Government of India is legislating as well as trying to execute further reforms in the Parole System for the upliftment of humanity amongst the prisoners to prove it to be a strong weapon of rehabilitation.
Files
RP-NM-18.pdf
Files
(2.1 MB)
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:8761b3f6a637d683f612e8398e316529
|
2.1 MB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Related works
References
- Supreme CourtYearly Digest 2009, Justice H.S. Bediin Jagdish v. State of Madhya Pradesh (2009) 9SCC495 Para 53. Constitution of India 1950. P. D. Sharma – PoliceandCriminal JusticeAdministrationin India (1985) 145. The Labelling Theory and (its perspective) – Propounder. Prof.N. V.Paranjape ,Criminology and Penology with Victimology. Ibid Supra Note 9. J.P.S. Sirohi, Criminology and Penology. Supra Note 12. Smt. Poonam Lata v.Wadhaman & others AIR1987 SC1383. Supra Note 9. Journal of Social Defence, 1972, 13. Bhikhabhai Devshi v. State of Gujarat, AIR1987 Guj. 136. Supra Note 9. State of Maharashtra and anr v. Suresh Pandurang Darvekar. AIR 2006 SC 247. Barnes and Teeters, New Horizons in Criminology, 566-567 (3rdEd.) Supra Note 20. Sutherland and Cressey.: Principles of Criminology, 568 (6th Ed.). Barnes and Teeters, New Horizons in Criminology, 329 (3rd Ed.). J.L.Gillin.: Criminology and Penology, 339 (3rd Ed.). Edition Taft and England: Criminology, 485, (4th Ed.). Sutherland and Cressey.: Principles of Criminology, 575. (6th. Ed.). Supra Note 9. Supra Note 9. Bhikhabhai Devshi v. State of Gujarat, AIR1987 Guj.136. Supra Note 9. Supra Note 9. Hand Book on Pre- Release Preparationon Correctional Constitutions, New York, American Correctional Association, 1950. Sutherland and Cressey.: Principles of Criminology, 586, (6th Ed.). Supra Note 9. Supra Note 21. Supra Note 9. Supra Note 9. Supra Note 21. Supra Note. 9 Principle of Natural Justice is implemented. The Constitution of India 1950, Art. 20(2). The Prisons Act (IX of 1894), Sec. 48-A.