Planned intervention: On Wednesday June 26th 05:30 UTC Zenodo will be unavailable for 10-20 minutes to perform a storage cluster upgrade.
Published December 31, 2018 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Nemoura normani Ricker 1952

  • 1. , Richard W. Baumann & Department of Biology and Center for Biodiversity Studies, Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, Kentucky 42101, U. S. A. E-mail: scott. grubbs @ wku. edu
  • 2. , and David K. Burton & Department of Biology, Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, U. S. A., 84602. E-mail: richard _ baumann @ byu. edu
  • 3. Faculty of Education, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K 1 N 6 N 5 E-mail: dburton @ uottawa. ca & Canadian National Collection, Agriculture Canada, Central Experimental Farm, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K 1 A 0 C 6

Description

Nemoura normani Ricker

Alaska Forestfly

http://lsid.speciesfile.org/urn:lsid: Plecoptera.speciesfile.org: TaxonName:6350

Nemoura species E: Ricker 1944:177.

Nemoura sp. A: Weber 1950:175.

Nemoura normani Ricker 1952:37. Type locality – Mackenzie River, Fort Norman, Northwest Territories (Holotype ♀ and Paratype ♀ examined) Nemoura normani: Illies 1966:209.

Nemoura normani: Stewart & Oswood 2006:78.

Distribution. Canada: NT. USA: AK (DeWalt et al. 2018).

Diagnosis. Nemoura normani was described from the holotype female and one paratype female (Ricker 1952) and is still unknown from the male stage. The females were described as “noticeably larger” than both N. arctica and N. trispinosa and exhibit subtle differences in the shape of the subgenital plate (Ricker 1952). Stewart and Oswood (2006) examined the paratype female (Alaska, Anaktuvik Pass, 6 July 1949, preserved in alcohol) during their study of the stoneflies of Alaska and western Canada but were unable to collect additional material. We likewise studied the paratype female and determined that it was indeed a Nemoura female with the correct wing venation, sclerotized cerci, and no cervical gills. The color of the wings are fumose in alcohol. This species is perhaps also absent from the Yukon (Stewart and Ricker 1997). Hence, the two females remain the only specimens of this species collected and none since 1949. Males or molecular data are needed to determine if this is a valid species, another Nemoura species (Ricker, 1964), or a junior synonym of either N. arctica or N. sahlbergi.

Conclusions

We present morphological evidence with SEM micrographs of the male epiprocts and cerci to propose that Nearctic N. rickeri and Nearctic N. trispinosa are junior synonyms of Holarctic N. arctica and Palearctic N. sahlbergi, respectively. Hence, both N. arctica and N. sahlbergi exhibit Holarctic distributions. On a similar note, Boumans & Baumann (2012) synonymized Amphinemura linda (Ricker, 1952), a species recognized for ca. 65 years, with A. palmeni (Koponen, 1917) using a combination of external reproductive morphology plus mitochondrial COI subunit and nuclear 28S gene sequence data. Amphinemura palmeni likewise is a Holarctic species (DeWalt et al. 2018).

Notes

Published as part of Grubbs, Scott A., Baumann, Richard W. & Burton, David K., 2018, Nearctic Nemoura Trispinosa Claassen, 1923 And N. Rickeri Jewett, 1971 Are Junior Synonyms Of Holarctic Nemoura Species (Plecoptera: Nemouridae), pp. 44-64 in Illiesia 14 (3) on page 57, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4761204

Files

Files (2.9 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:a660380a6b7e9334e1497daee6e2c01f
2.9 kB Download

System files (21.3 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:185189e8c989565294136a25fc290f3c
21.3 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Family
Nemouridae
Genus
Nemoura
Kingdom
Animalia
Order
Plecoptera
Phylum
Arthropoda
Scientific name authorship
Ricker
Species
normani
Taxon rank
species
Taxonomic concept label
Nemoura normani Ricker, 1952 sec. Grubbs, Baumann & Burton, 2018

References

  • Ricker, W. E. 1944. Some Plecoptera from the far north. The Canadian Entomologist, 76: 174 - 185. https: // doi. org / 10.4039 / Ent 76174 - 9
  • Weber, N. A. 1950. A survey of the insects and related arthropods of Arctic Alaska, Part I. Transactions of the American Entomological Society, 76: 147 - 206. http: // www. jstor. org / stable / 25077616
  • Ricker, W. E. 1952. Systematic Studies in Plecoptera. Indiana University Publications Series, 18: 1 - 200. http: // www. nativefishlab. net / library / textpdf / 16
  • Illies, J. 1966. Katalog der rezenten Plecoptera. Das Tierreich. 82. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin. 631 pp.
  • Stewart, K. W. & M. W. Oswood. 2006. The stoneflies (Plecoptera) of Alaska and western Canada. Caddis Press, Columbus, Ohio. 325 pp.
  • DeWalt, R. E., M. D. Maehr, U. Neu-Becker & G. Stueber. 2018. Plecoptera Species File Online. Version 5.0 / 5.0. Accessed 1 March 2018. http: // Plecoptera. SpeciesFile. org
  • Stewart, K. W. & W. E. Ricker. 1997. Stoneflies (Plecoptera) of the Yukon. Pages 201 - 222. In: Danks, H. V. & J. A. Downes (editors). Insects of the Yukon. Biological Survey of Canada (Terrestrial Arthropods), Ottawa. http: // www. biology. ualberta. ca / bsc / pdf / stewart.
  • Ricker, W. E. 1964. Distribution of Canadian stoneflies. Gewasser und Abwasser, 34 / 35: 50 - 71.
  • Boumans, L. & R. W. Baumann. 2012. Amphinemura palmeni is a valid Holarctic stonefly species (Plecoptera: Nemouridae). Zootaxa, 3537: 59 - 75. http: // 216.92.145.68 / zootaxa / 2012 / f / zt 03537 p 075. pdf
  • Koponen, J. 1917. Plecopterologische Studien I: Die Plecopteren-Arten Finlands. Acta Societatis pro fauna et flora Fennica, 44: 1 - 18.