Published May 28, 2021
| Version v1
Journal article
Open
Book review: Neanderthal Language: Demystifying the Linguistic Powers of Our Extinct Cousins
Description
Recently, we have witnessed an explosion of studies and discussions claiming that Neanderthals engaged in a range of “symbolic” behaviors, including personal ornament use (Radovčić et al. 2015), funerary practices (Balzeau et al. 2020), visual arts (Hoffmann et al. 2018), body aesthetics (Roebroeks et al. 2012), etc. In Paleolithic archaeology, it has become mainstream to axiomatically infer from these putative behaviors that Neanderthals engaged in symbol use and that Neanderthals thus possessed some form of language. Rudolf Botha’s bombastic title "Neanderthal Language: Demystifying the Linguistic Powers of Our Extinct Cousins" provides a detailed and very critical overview of the archaeological hypotheses and speculations about Neanderthal language.
Files
fpsyg-12-702361.pdf
Files
(128.9 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:348cb94a2d8367523b3793598d608dee
|
128.9 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Related works
- Is new version of
- Preprint: 10.31234/osf.io/zs37p (DOI)
References
- Balzeau, A., Turq, A., Talamo, S., Daujeard, C., Guérin, G.,Welker, F., et al. (2020). Pluridisciplinary evidence for burial for the La Ferrassie 8 Neandertal child. Sci. Rep. 10:21230. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-77611-z
- Berwick, R. C., and Chomsky, N. (2016). Why Only Us: Language and Evolution. Cambridge, MA; London: MIT Press. doi: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262034241.001.0001
- Botha, R. (2009). "Theoretical underpinnings of inferences about language evolution: the syntax used at Blombos Cave," in The Cradle of Language, eds R. Botha and C. Knight (New York: Oxford University Press), 93–111. Available online at: http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/44890
- Botha, R. (2010). On the soundness of inferring modern language from symbolic behaviour. Camb. Archaeol. J. 20, 345–356. doi: 10.1017/S0959774310000454
- Botha, R. (2012). "Inferring modern language from ancient objects," in The Oxford Handbook of Language Evolution, eds K. R. Gibson, and M. Tallerman (New York: Oxford Q14 University Press), 303–312. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199541119.013.0030
- Botha, R. (2015). Teaching and learning subsistence skills: did premodern hominins use language to do it? Camb. Archaeol. J. 25, 901–908. doi: 10.1017/S0959774315000335
- Botha, R. (2020). Neanderthal Language: Demystifying the Linguistic Powers of our Extinct Cousins. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/9781108868167
- d'Errico, F. (2009). "The archaeology of early religious practices: a plea for a hypothesis-testing approach," in Becoming Human: Innovation in Prehistoric Material and Spiritual Culture, eds C. Renfrew and I. Morley (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 104–122.
- Gabrić, P. (2021). Book review: "Neanderthal Language: Demystifying the Linguistic Powers of Our Extinct Cousins" by Rudolf Botha. PsyArXiv. doi: 10.31234/osf.io/zs37p
- Gabrić, P., Banda, M., and Karavanić, I. (2018). "Palaeolithic toolmaking and the evolution of cognition and language," in Cognitive Science, eds T. Strle and O. Markič (Ljubljana: Institut "Jožef Stefan"), 12–16. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.4674332
- Garofoli, D. (2014). Do early body ornaments prove cognitive modernity? A critical analysis from situated cognition. Phenomenol. Cogn. Sci. 14, 803–825. doi: 10.1007/s11097-014-9356-0
- Garofoli, D., and Iliopoulos, A. (2019). Replacing epiphenomenalism: a pluralistic enactive take on the metaplasticity of early body ornamentation. Philos. Technol. 32, 215–242. doi: 10.1007/s13347-017-0296-9
- Hoffmann, D. L., Standish, C. D., García-Diez, M., Pettitt, P. B., Milton, J. A., Zilhão, J., et al. (2018). U-Th dating of carbonate crusts reveals Neandertal origin of Iberian cave art. Science 359, 912–915. doi: 10.1126/science.aap7778
- Kuhlwilm, M. (2018). The evolution of FOXP2 in the light of admixture. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 21, 120–126. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.04.006
- Murphy, E., and Benítez-Burraco, A. (2018). Paleo-oscillomics: inferring aspects of Neanderthal language abilities from gene regulation of neural oscillations. J. Anthropol. Sci. 96, 111–124. doi: 10.4436/JASS.96010
- Progovac, L. (2016). A gradualist scenario for language evolution: precise linguistic reconstruction of early human (and Neandertal) grammars. Front. Psychol. 7:1714. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01714
- Radovčić, D., Sršen, A. O., Radovčić, J., and Frayer, D. W. (2015). Evidence for Neandertal jewelry: modified white-tailed eagle claws at Krapina. PLoS ONE 10:e0119802. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119802
- Reinscheid, R. K., Mafessoni, F., Lüttjohann, A., Jüngling, K., Pape, H.-C., and Schulz, S. (2021). Neandertal introgression and accumulation of hypomorphic mutations in the neuropeptide S (NPS) system promote attenuated functionality. Peptides 138:170506. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2021.170506
- Roebroeks,W., Sier,M. J., Nielsen, T. K., De Loecker, D., Pares, J.M., Arps, C. E. S., et al. (2012). Use of red ochre by early Neandertals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 1889–1894. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1112261109
- Silvert, M., Quintana-Murci, L., and Rotival, M. (2019). Impact and evolutionary determinants of Neanderthal introgression on transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 104, 1241–1250. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.04.016
- Stout, D., and Chaminade, T. (2007). The evolutionary neuroscience of tool making. Neuropsychologia 45, 1091–1100. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.09.014
- Taskent, O., Lin, Y. L., Patramanis, I., Pavlidis, P., and Gokcumen, O. (2020). Analysis of haplotypic variation and deletion polymorphisms point to multiple archaic introgression events, including fromAltaiNeanderthal lineage. Genetics 215, 497–509. doi: 10.1534/genetics.120.303167
- Villanea, F. A., and Schraiber, J. G. (2019). Multiple episodes of interbreeding between Neanderthal and modern humans. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 39–44. doi: 10.1038/s41559-018-0735-8