Comparison of Retention Forces of Different Fabrication Methods of Co-Cr Crowns: Pre-sintered and Milled, Cast and Electroforming Secondary Crowns with Different Taper Angles
- 1. Department of Prosthodontics, Dental School, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Germany
- 2. Department of Prosthodontics, Dental School, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Germany.
- 3. Clinic of Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Cariology, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Switzerland
- 4. Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Switzerland
Description
To investigate the retention forces of differently fabricated secondary crowns made of Co-Cr alloy and electroforming secondary crowns considering different taper angles. Cobalt-chromium primary crowns with 0°, 1° and 2° taper angles
were fabricated. Secondary crowns were made either by i.) a milling and sintering, ii.) casting or iii.) electro-forming process. Pull-off tests were performed and data were analyzed by parametric statistics (p<0.05). With regard to the different taper angles, Co-Cr milled and cast groups, no impact on retention force was observed. Within the electroforming group, primary crowns with a taper angle of 1° showed a higher retention force than crowns with angles of 0° or 2°. With respect to the secondary crowns, primary crowns with a taper angle of 1° showed no impact on the results. Within the taper angles of 0° and 2°, the electroforming group exhibited lower retention forces than cast or milled ones. In the 0° taper angle group, milled secondary crowns displayed higher values than cast ones.
Files
IJDOS-2377-8075-S2-003.pdf
Files
(1.3 MB)
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:60bc13ab0c04e6319aa2f5f85bd52e95
|
1.3 MB | Preview Download |