Science Governance and Scientometrics
Published March 1, 2021 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Exercising the Rights to the Results of Scientific and Technological Activities in the Context of the Implementation of the "Regulatory Guillotine" Mechanism: Legal and Technological Aspects

Creators

Description

Introduction. When planning the implementation of the ‘regulatory guillotine’ mechanism in the field of intellectual property, the analysis of the current regulatory and legal framework of the Russian Federation in terms of exercising the rights to the results of scientific and technological activities within the purview of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (which is the key authorised federal executive body in this area) becomes especially relevant. The goal of this research is to study the current regulation of the relations under consideration and prepare recommendations for its improvement. Monitoring Tools. The research employed the method of analysis, systemic and structural, functional, specific and sociological, formal and legal as well as technical and legal methods and the method of interpretation of legal rules. Results. The materials collected during the monitoring allows conducting a comprehensive analysis of the system of legal regulation of issues related to exercising the rights to the results of scientific and technological activities. This research can be used to optimise the system for managing the rights to the results of scientific and technological activities. Conclusion. Based on the results of this work, it can be concluded that the national legislation of the Russian Federation in this area is very diverse and includes acts of federal legislation, decrees of the Government of the Russian Federation regulating more specific public relations as well as acts of ministerial rule-making that approve, among other things, methodological recommendations on certain issues. Similarities between the legal acts regulating the inventory of the results of scientific and technical activities were identified, resulting in the formulation of proposals for the consolidation of such acts. There is also the undeniable advantage that the rules are focused on bringing the results of intellectual activity as far as possible into the economic realm for commercialisation and practical application. It can be concluded that the issues of improving the legal regulation of the commercialisation of the results of intellectual activity may become the subject of additional research.

Notes

For citation: Kulikov DM, Ishchenko AA. Exercising the Rights to the Results of Scientific and Technological Activities in the Context of the Implementation of the "Regulatory Guillotine" Mechanism: Legal and Technological Aspects. Science Governance and Scientometrics. 2021;16(1):107-143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33873/2686-6706.2021.16-1.107-143

Files

Exercising the Rights to the Results of Scientific and Technological Activities. Kulikov, Ishchenko. 2021-1.pdf

Files (304.9 kB)

Additional details

References

  • Bogdanova OV. Belonging of the exclusive (property) right to a state-legal scientific budgetary institution for results of intellectual activity, established in accordance with the state (municipal) contract. Ekonomics and Law. 2017;4:37-41. Available at: https://istina.msu.ru/publications/article/193265521/ (accessed: 26.10.2020). (In Russ.)
  • Efimtseva TV. Freedom of commercial use of results of intellectual activity as a principle of innovation law. Proceedings of Higher Educational Institutions. Pravovedenie. 2011;5:104-109. Available at: https://center-bereg.ru/b3943.html (accessed: 26.10.2020). (In Russ.)
  • Kletkina YuA. Organization of intellectual property objects inventory. Vestnik OSU. 2009;5:121-126. Available at: https://cyberleninka. ru/article/n/organizatsiya-inventarizatsii-obektov-intellektualnoysobstvennosti (accessed: 26.10.2021). (In Russ.)
  • Bogacheva OV, Smorodinov OV, Vlasikhin SA. Improving the legal regulation of the rights of a state institution to intellectual property. Bukhgalterskii uchet v byudzhetnykh i nekommercheskikh organizatsiyakh. 2017;3:9-46. Available at: https://www.imemo.ru/publications/info/ sovershenstvovanie-normativno-pravovogo-regulirovaniya-prav-gosudarstvennogo-uchrezhdeniya-na-intellektualynuyu-sobstvennosty (accessed: 26.10.2020). (In Russ.)
  • Mirskikh IYu, Mingaleva ZhA. Legal regulation of rights to the results of intellectual activity in Russia and abroad. Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2015;3:62-70. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/pravovoe-regulirovanie-prav-na-rezultaty-intellektualnoy-deyatelnosti-v-rossii-i-za-rubezhom (acessed: 26.10.2020). (In Russ.)
  • Gaponenko MA, Ulanov ED. Legal regulation of innovative activities in modern-day Russia, with regard to the implementation of the "regulatory guillotine" mechanism in the sphere of intellectual property. Science Governance and Scientometrics. 2020;15(1):30-54. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.33873/2686-6706.2020.15-1.30-54 (In Russ.)
  • Kalmykova AV. Accounting and inventory of the results of military, special and dual-use intellectual activity: legal aspects. Journal of Russian Law. 2004;3:113-123. Available at: https://center-bereg.ru/l3402. html (accessed: 26.10.2020). (In Russ.)
  • Kozyrev AN. Inventory of the results of intellectual activity. Imushchestvennye otnosheniya v RF. 2002;9(14):46-48. Available at: https:// cyberleninka.ru/article/n/inventarizatsiya-rezultatov-intellektualnoy-deyatelnosti/viewer (accessed: 26.10.2020). (In Russ.)
  • Varpaeva IA. Accounting for the results of intellectual activity in the process of creating business entities by budgetary institutions. Bukhgalterskii uchet v byudzhetnykh i nekommercheskikh organizatsiyakh. 2010;10:4-10. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ uchet-rezultatov-intellektualnoy-deyatelnosti-v-protsesse-sozdaniya-byudzhetnymi-uchrezhdeniyami-hozyaystvennyh-obschestv (accessed: 26.10.2020). (In Russ.)