Published March 29, 2021 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Fimbriosthenelais longipinnis

  • 1. Senckenberg, Forschungsinstitut und Naturmuseum Frankfurt, Marine Evertebraten II, Senckenberganlage 25, D- 60325 Frankfurt, Germany. & Thomson Environmental Consultants, Compass House, Surrey Research Park, Guildford, GU 2 7 AG, United Kingdom.
  • 2. Eurofins AquaSense, H. J. E., Wenckebachweg 120, 1114 AD, Amsterdam-Duivendrecht, Netherlands.

Description

Fimbriosthenelais longipinnis (Grube, 1869) (emended)

Figs 5E, 7

Sthenelais longipinnis Grube, 1869: 493.

Sthenelais variabilis Potts, 1910: 349, pl. 19 fig. 22, pl. 21 fig. 63 [part; var. glabra].

Sthenelais dubiosa Horst, 1917: 111, pl. 22 fig. 7.

Fimbriosthenelais longipinnis – Pettibone 1971: 26, figs 15–17. — Aungtonya 2002: 217, figs 7–8. Barnich & Fiege 2003: 117, fig. 58. — Wehe 2007: 64, fig. 5. — Gil 2011: 940 (?part, see remark below). — Aungtonya & Eibye-Jacobsen 2018: 3, figs 1–2.

Diagnosis

Dorsal cirri absent on segment 3. Ventral body surface finely papillated. Outer elytral margin with filiform papillae, elytral surface with rounded to conical microtubercles (in anterior elytra surface completely covered, in middle and posterior elytra microtubercles confined to areas near margins). Neuropodial posterior bracts bilobed. Parapodial stylodes distinctly papillated.

Type material

The holotype of Sthenelais longipinnis was investigated by Pettibone (1971) and Wehe (2007), all others by Pettibone (1971).

The respective type localities are: Sthenelais longipinnis (Red Sea), S. variabilis (Maldive Islands, Hulule, Male Atoll, Indian Ocean), S. dubiosa (Indonesia, Indo-Pacific, several localities: Bay of Badjo, W Flores; Kwandang Bay; E of Dangar Besar, Saleh Bay).

Other material (examined)

CYPRUS • 3 specs; E Mediterranean Sea, Akrotiri Bay; stn CY08 SB76B; depth 55 m; 13 Feb. 1968; EtOH preserved; SMF 10597. (Fig. 7; see also Barnich & Fiege 2003)

JORDAN • 1 spec.; Red Sea, Gulf of Aqaba, in front of Marine Science Station; on corals and stones; 8–10 m depth; 23 Mar. 2007; EtOH preserved; SMF 19366 (original identification by T. Wehe) • 1 spec.; Red Sea, Gulf of Aqaba, in front of Marine Science Station; in sea grass meadow; 22.5 m depth; 25 Mar. 2007; EtOH preserved; SMF 19394 (original identification by T. Wehe).

SAUDI ARABIA • 1 spec.; Red Sea, Farasan Islands, Rabigh, coast guard station; stn RSS1 2011-1; 22°58′ N, 38°50′ E; 3–4 m depth; 7 Apr. 2011; EtOH preserved; SMF 24345 (see also Wehe 2017). (Fig. 5E)

Description

PROSTOMIUM. Median antenna with moderately long, smooth, tapering style; ceratophore with large auricles. Lateral antennae fused to inner dorsal side of tentaculophores, very short, not reaching half the length of dorsal tentacular cirri. Two pairs of eyes present.

TENTACULOPHORES. Dorsal tentacular cirri longer than median antenna, of similar shape. Ventral tentacular cirri about half the length of dorsal ones.

ELYTRA. With filiform and shorter, clavate papillae on outer lateral margin; surface of anterior elytra completely covered by rounded to conical microtubercles, in more posterior elytra microtubercles confined to areas near margins (Fig. 7A–B).

CIRRI. Dorsal cirri absent from segment 3. Ventral cirri with basal knob, without long basal papillae.

PARAPODIA. Stylodes more or less club-shaped, with large, obvious papillae (Fig. 5E). Parapodia of anterior and middle body with stylodes present on anterior side of notopodial bract, on neuropodial acicular lobe and on upper and lower parts of bilobed posterior neuropodial bract. Margins of neuropodial anteroventral bract with digitiform extensions, anterodorsal bract reduced, without stylodes or extensions (Fig. 7C).

CHAETAE. Notochaetae slender, spinous, tapering to simple capillary tip. Upper neurochaetae mainly slender compound falcigers with multi-articled blade and minutely bidentate tip and a few simple, spinous chaetae. Middle neurochaetae stout compound falcigers with short single- or up to three-articled blade and bidentate tip. Lower neurochaetae slender compound falcigers with multi-articled blade and minutely bidentate tip.

BODY SURFACE. Usually finely papillated ventrally.

SIZE. Length more than 30 mm, width up to 5 mm for more than 80 segments (see Pettibone 1971). Specimens figured: SMF 24345 (Fig. 5E): complete specimen, strongly coiled, length and number of segments not determined, width 2.5 mm; SMF 10597 (Fig. 7): anterior fragment, width 2 mm for 23 segments.

Remarks

The description above is emended for the details regarding the shape and size of the stylodes and their associated papillae and for the terminology used in the description of the neuropodial bracts. The species has been extensively studied by Pettibone (1971), Wehe (2007) and Aungtonya & Eibye-Jacobsen (2018); please refer to these works for additional details.

Specimens from the Western Mediterranean described by Gil (2011) seem to agree with F. longipinnis as described by Pettibone (1971) regarding their elytral characters and the finely papillated ventral body surface. However, they seem to differ due to a reduced number of stylodes (and those present having no papillae, but just sensorial hairs) and blades of falcigers with not more than three articles. Because of the confusing terminology regarding extensions and papillae on bracts, lobes and stylodes (see above), it is likely that the stylodes described by Gil (2011) as lacking papillae and having just hairs correspond to the extensions of the anteroventral bract. As mentioned by Pettibone (1971) the number of articles of the blades is rather variable and would also fit the current concept of F. longipinnis. Another possibility is that the specimens are juveniles of either F. longipinnis or maybe F. zetlandica. Unfortunately, those animals were not available for study and thus we cannot confirm the presence of this species in the Western Mediterranean.

The specimens of F. longipinnis from Cyprus (Eastern Mediterranean), described by Barnich & Fiege (2003) and re-investigated herein, agree in all characters with Pettibone’s revised description.

Sthenelais minor var. digitata Fauvel, 1919 was considered a possible synonym of F. longipinnis by Pettibone (1971). At the time of her revision no type material was available, but Wehe (2007) was able to examine the holotype and placed Sthenelais minor var. digitata in synonymy with Fimbriosthenelais hirsuta (Potts, 1910).

Distribution and habitat

Not known to occur in the Northeast Atlantic; presence confirmed for the Eastern Mediterranean Sea. Otherwise widely reported from the Red Sea and Indo-Pacific. Type of habitat unknown; in shallow water down to 75 m depth (see Pettibone 1971; Barnich & Fiege 2003).

Notes

Published as part of Barnich, Ruth & Haaren, Ton Van, 2021, Revision of Sthenelais Kinberg, 1856, Fimbriosthenelais Pettibone, 1971 and Eusthenelais McIntosh, 1876 (Polychaeta, Sigalionidae) in the Northeast Atlantic, pp. 138-171 in European Journal of Taxonomy 740 on pages 158-160, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2021.740.1287, http://zenodo.org/record/4649646

Files

Files (7.1 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:06ce663bd1228221b897f0da3f39d397
7.1 kB Download

System files (46.1 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:b73075115d66bf53c7c6e76fd1b7857f
46.1 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Collection code
SMF , SMF, T
Event date
1968-02-13 , 2007-03-23 , 2007-03-25 , 2011-04-07
Family
Sigalionidae
Genus
Fimbriosthenelais
Kingdom
Animalia
Material sample ID
CY08
Order
Phyllodocida
Phylum
Annelida
Scientific name authorship
Grube
Species
longipinnis
Taxon rank
species
Verbatim event date
1968-02-13 , 2007-03-23 , 2007-03-25 , 2011-04-07
Taxonomic concept label
Fimbriosthenelais longipinnis (Grube, 1869) sec. Barnich & Haaren, 2021

References

  • Grube E. 1869. Beschreibungen neuer oder weniger bekannter von Hrn. Ehrenberg gesammelter Anneliden des rothen Meeres. Monatsberichte der Koniglich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin aus dem Jahre 1869: 484 - 521. [Imprinted year 1870, but published in 1869 according to The Zoological Record 1870 (vol. 6) for the year 1869].
  • Potts F. A. 1910. XII. Polychaeta of the Indian Ocean. Part II. The Palmyridae, Aphroditidae, Polynoidae, Acoetidae, and Sigalionidae. Transactions of the Linnean Society, series 2: 13: 325 - 353. https: // doi. org / 10.1111 / j. 1096 - 3642.1910. tb 00519. x
  • Horst R. 1917. Polychaeta Errantia of the Siboga Expedition, Pt. 2. Aphroditidae and Chrysopetalidae. Siboga-Expeditie Monographie 24 (1 b): 45 - 143.
  • Pettibone M. H. 1971. Partial revision of the genus Sthenelais Kinberg (Polychaeta: Sigalionidae) with diagnoses of two new genera. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 109: 1 - 40. https: // doi. org / 10.5479 / si. 00810282.109
  • Aungtonya C. 2002. A preliminary study of Sigalionidae (Annelida: Polychaeta) from the Andaman Sea off southwestern Thailand, with an overview of presently recognized genera. Phuket Marine Biological Center Special Publication 24: 205 - 235.
  • Barnich R. & Fiege D. 2003. The Aphroditoidea (Annelida, Polychaeta) of the Mediterranean Sea. Abhandlungen der Senckenbergischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft 559: 1 - 167.
  • Wehe T. 2007. Revision of the scale worms (Polychaeta: Aphroditoidea) occurring in the seas surrounding the Arabian Peninsula. Part II. Sigalionidae. Fauna of Arabia 23: 41 - 124.
  • Gil J. C. 2011. The European Fauna of Annelida Polychaeta. Vol. 2. PhD Thesis. University of Lisbon, Portugal.
  • Aungtonya C. & Eibye-Jacobsen D. 2018. The genus Fimbriosthenelais Pettibone, 1971 (Sigalionidae: Polychaeta) with the description of a new species from the Andaman Sea. Phuket Marine Biological Center Research Bulletin 75: 1 - 12.
  • Fauvel P. 1919. Annelides polychetes de Madagascar, de Djibouti et du Golfe Persique. Archives de Zoologie experimentale et generale 58: 315 - 473. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. part. 8154