Published March 27, 2021 | Version v1
Dataset Open

Magnitude and direction of stream-forest community interactions change with time scale

  • 1. Michigan Technological University
  • 2. Idaho State University
  • 3. United States Geological Survey
  • 4. Ehime University
  • 5. Chiba University
  • 6. Colorado State University
  • 7. Kyoto University

Description

Networks of direct and indirect biotic interactions underpin the complex dynamics and stability of ecological systems, yet experimental and theoretical studies often yield conflicting evidence regarding the direction (positive or negative) or magnitude of these interactions. We revisited pioneering datasets collected at the deciduous forested Horonai Stream and conducted ecosystem-level syntheses to demonstrate that the direction of direct and indirect interactions can change depending on the timescale of observation. Prior experimental studies showed that terrestrial prey that enter the stream from the adjacent forest caused positive indirect effects on aquatic invertebrates during summer by diverting fish consumption. Seasonal and annual estimates of secondary production and organic matter flows along food web pathway demonstrate that this seasonal input of terrestrial invertebrate prey increases production of certain fish species, reversing the indirect effect on aquatic invertebrates from positive at the seasonal time scale to negative at the annual time scale. Even though terrestrial invertebrate prey contributed 54% of the annual organic matter flux to fishes, primarily during summer, fish still consumed 98% of the aquatic invertebrate annual production, leading to top-down control that is not revealed in short-term experiments and demonstrating that aquatic prey may be a limiting resource for fishes. Changes in the direction or magnitude of interactions may be a key factor creating non-linear or stabilizing feedbacks in complex systems, and these dynamics can be revealed by merging experimental and comparative approaches at different scales.

Notes

The first tab of this worksheet contains metadata, including the sources for any data that were previously published.  Each other tab contains a different dataset. If more appropriate, the first worksheet could be transoformed into a ReadMe file.  

It's important for readers to know that although all of these data were collected from the same 1.2km study segment, they were not collected from the same reaches or with the same level of replication.  Detailed collection and analysis methods, including the location of samples, scale and extent of study reaches for each metric are all described in detail in the Ecology MS identified above, which is currently in production.

Funding provided by: Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Crossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001691
Award Number:

Funding provided by: National Science Foundation
Crossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000001
Award Number: DEB-1451919

Funding provided by: National Science Foundation
Crossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000001
Award Number: DEB-0516136

Funding provided by: National Science Foundation
Crossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000001
Award Number: DEB-1754224

Funding provided by: National Science Foundation
Crossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000001
Award Number: DEB-0516133

Files

Files (1.1 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:71a9aeaafea2efafad40336986e69fd7
1.1 MB Download

Additional details

Related works