Scholarly communication: An introduction. From the traditional paradigm to Open Science
Description
This lesson is part of the "Scholarly communication. Open Science and Research Data Management" course (10 hrs) organized at Scuola Sant'Anna of Pisa in 2021.
The training course has been tailored to the PhD students in Human Rights and Global Politics, and consists of the following 4 modules:
Module 1 (2nd March 2021): Scholarly communication: an introduction. From the traditional paradigm to Open Science
Module 2 (5th March 2021): The Open Access publishing paradigm and FAIR (Open) Data
Module 3 (8th March 2021): Research Data Management and Data Management Plans
Module 4 (11th March 2021): Research Infrastructures, the EOSC, OS skills and training, Science evaluation and OS workflows
The course covers all modern aspects of Open Science (Publications, Open Data, FAIR principles, Data Management Plan, etc.) and provides with the tools and standards required to embed Open Science in the research workflow.
Files
Open Science - PhD Human Rights - 2021 - module 1.pdf
Files
(21.6 MB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:2765cf27ea376a7cf23614877630a2ae
|
3.6 MB | Preview Download |
|
md5:ad337b4841a2be86c02ea947830fa676
|
18.0 MB | Download |
Additional details
Related works
- References
- Lesson: 10.5281/zenodo.4317277 (DOI)
References
- ACRL Scholarly Communications Committee: Principles and Strategies for the Reform of Scholarly Communication. Text. Association of College & Research Libraries (ACRL). 2006. http://www.ala.org/acrl/publications/whitepapers/principlesstrategies
- S. Husain, Nazim M, Analysis of Open Access Scholarly Journals in Media & Communication. DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology. 2013; 33(5): 405–11. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.33.5106
- R. Alder, et al, Citation Statistics. A report from the International Mathematical Union (IMU) in cooperation with the International Council of Industrial and Applied Mathematics (ICIAM) and the Institute of Mathematical Statistics (IMS, Joint Committee on Quantitative Assessment of Research, 2008. https://www.mathunion.org/fileadmin/IMU/Report/CitationStatistics.pdf
- A.L. Barabasi, Linked. The new Science of Networks, 2002.
- T. Berners-Lee, "The World Wide Web - Past, present, future. Exploring Universality", 2002. https://www.w3.org/2002/04/Japan/Lecture.html
- T. Berners-Lee, Weaving the web: The Original Design and Ultimate Destiny of the World Wide, 2000.
- P. Bogner, Capua, I., Lipman, D. et al. A global initiative on sharing avian flu data. Nature 442, 981 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/442981a
- F. Di Donato, La scienza e la rete. L'uso pubblico della ragione nell'età del web, FUP, 2009. http://www.fupress.com/catalogo/la-scienza-e-la-rete/1998
- F. Di Donato, The Web as a Research Environment. Definitions, tools, and best practices, 2016. https://figshare.com/articles/presentation/The_Web_as_a_Research_Environment_Definitions_tools_and_best_practices/5966926
- P. Greco, Il Sidereus Nuncius e l'origine della comunicazione pubblica della scienza, S&F_scienzaefilosofia.it, 2018. https://www.scienzaefilosofia.com/2018/03/26/il-sidereus-nuncius-e-lorigine-della-comunicazione-pubblica-della-scienza/
- J.-C. Guédon, In Oldenburg's long shadow, ARL, 2001.https://www.arl.org/resources/in-oldenburgs-long-shadow/
- T. Jefferson, Lettera a Isaac McPherson del 13 agosto 1813. https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Jefferson/03-06-02-0322
- E. Lazzeri, F. Di Donato, Open Science: Why it is important, 10.5281/zenodo.4317277
- E. McKiernan, et al, Meta-Research: Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations, 2019. https://elifesciences.org/articles/47338
- M.T. Niles, et al, Why we publish where we do: Faculty publishing values and their relationship to review, promotion and tenure expectations, 2019. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/706622v1
- M.C. Pievatolo, I padroni del discorso. Platone e la libertà della conoscenza, Methexis - PLUS, Pisa, http://bfp.sp.unipi.it/ebooks/mcpla.html