Published February 3, 2021 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Phyllodoce Lamarck 1818

Description

Genus Phyllodoce Lamarck, 1818

Type species. Phyllodoce laminosa Lamarck, 1818, by monotypy.

Phyllodoce Lamarck, 1818: 316–317.

Lepadorhynchus Schmarda, 1861: 88. Error for Lopadorrhynchus.

Phyllodoce Grube, 1878: 9. Error for Phyllodoce.

Carobia (Paracarobia) Czerniavsky, 1882: 158, in part.

Carobia (Protocacabia) Czerniavsky, 1882: 155, in part.

Globidoce Bergstr ̂m, 1914: 87. Error for Sphaerodoce Bergstr ̂m, 1914.

? Prophyllodoce Hartman, 1966: 187.

Zverlinum Averintsev, 1972: 106–107.

Phyllodoce (Aponaitides) McCammon & Montagner, 1979: 363–364.

Phyllouschakovius Blake, 1988: 254.

Sphaerodoce Berstr ̂m, 1914: 154.

Diagnosis (Emended after Pleijel 1991, additions in italics): Prostomium with a pair of antennae and palps (Fig. 2), nuchal papilla present, situated in posterior incision of prostomium (Fig. 3A). Eyes usually present (Fig. 2). Large retractile nuchal organs. Proboscis divided into proximal and distal parts (Fig. 3A). Proximal part with rounded to conical papillae, either in rows or diffusely distributed. Distal part with six rows of tubercles or (rarely) with papillae. All anterior segments separate, first segments may be dorsally covered by posterior part of prostomium. Chaetae present from segment 2 to 4. Segmental bands of cilia present. Parapodia uni- or (rarely) biramous. Dorsal cirri symmetrical or asymmetrical, with varied shapes i.e. lanceolate ( Fig. 4A), cordiform (Fig. 4C), rectangular (Fig. 4D), or rounded (Fig. 4F) with well-developed cirrophores (Fig. 4B) or without dorsal extensions. Dorsal cirri with a ciliated furrow on dorsal, posterior side. Prechaetal lobes bilobate, symmetrical, or asymmetrical. Postchaetal lobes usually rounded. Rostrum of chaetal shaft with a large number of teeth (Fig. 5A), proximally decreasing in size. Ventral cirri foliaceous, rounded (Fig. 4A), reniform, or lanceolate (Fig. 4C). Pygidial cirri pointed, cylindrical or slightly flattened (Fig. 5 B–D); median pygidial papilla usually absent.

Remarks. The genus Phyllodoce is the most species-rich in Phyllodocidae with 209 described species, though only 109 are deemed valid (Read & Fauchald 2019). Several species are known from incomplete specimens in which important characters have been insufficiently described and as such regarded as nomina dubia (Pleijel 1991). The most recent diagnosis was provided by Pleijel (1991), who considered the median pygidial papilla absent, although it is present in Phyllodoce tamoya sp. nov. and Phyllodoce colorata sp. nov. herein described.

Notes

Published as part of Oliveira, Verônica Maria De, Magalhães, Wagner F. & Lana, Paulo Da Cunha, 2021, Ten new species of Phyllodoce Lamarck, 1818 (Phyllodocidae, Annelida) from Brazil, pp. 1-61 in Zootaxa 4924 (1) on pages 5-9, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4924.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4496804

Files

Files (3.3 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:e64da3aa1a18e7e935af5c20440f3162
3.3 kB Download

System files (37.9 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:5b891f62375d73517a428194f22dd41d
37.9 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Family
Phyllodocidae
Genus
Phyllodoce
Kingdom
Animalia
Order
Phyllodocida
Phylum
Annelida
Scientific name authorship
Lamarck
Taxon rank
genus
Taxonomic concept label
Phyllodoce Lamarck, 1818 sec. Oliveira, Magalhães & Lana, 2021

References

  • Lamarck, J. B. (1818) Histoire naturelle des Animaux sans Vertebres. Vol. 5. Verdiere, Paris, 612 pp.
  • Schmarda, L. K. (1861) Neue wirbellose Thiere beobachtet und gesammelt auf einer Reise um die Erdr [sic, should be Erde] 1853 bis 1857 von Ludwig K. Schmarda. Erster Band. Turbellarien, Rotatorien und Anneliden. Zweite Halfte. [New invertebrate animals observed and collected on a journey around the earth 1853 to 1857. First Volume. Turbellarien, Rotatorien and Anneliden. Second Half]. Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig, 164 pp., Mit 22 colorirten kupfertafeln und mehreren hundert figuren in holzschnitt [22 coloured copper plates and several hundred figures in woodcut].
  • Grube, A. E. (1878) Annulata Semperiana. Beitrage zur Kenntniss der Annelidenfauna der Philippinen nach den von Herrn Prof. Semper mitgebrachten Sammlungen. Memoires l'Academie Imperiale des Sciences de St. - Petersbourg, 25 (8), 1 - 300. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 85345
  • Czerniavsky, V. (1882) Materialia ad zoographiam ponticam comparatum. Fasc. 3. Vermes. Bulletin de la Societe Imperiale des Naturaslistes de Moscou, 53, 146 - 198.
  • Hartman, O. (1966) Polychaetous annelids of the Hawaiian Islands. Occasional Papers of the Bernice P. Bishop Museum, 23 (11), 163 - 252.
  • Averintsev, V. G. (1972) Benthic errant polychaetes from the Antarctic and subantarctic collected by the Soviet Antarctic Expeditions Issledovaniya fauny morei. Zoologicheskii Institut Akademii Nauk USSR, 11 (19), 88 - 292 [in Russian]
  • Blake, J. A. (1988) New species and records of Phyllodocidae (Polychaeta) from Georges bank and other areas of the Western North Atlantic. Sarsia, 73, 245 - 257. https: // doi. org / 10.1080 / 00364827.1988.10413410
  • Pleijel, F. (1991) Phylogeny and classification of the Phyllodocidae (Polychaeta). Zoologica Scripta, 20, 225 - 261. https: // doi. org / 10.1111 / j. 1463 - 6409.1991. tb 00289. x
  • Read, G. & Fauchald, K. (Ed.) (2019) World Polychaeta database. Phyllodoce Lamarck, 1818. Available from: http: // www. marinespecies. org / polychaeta / aphia. php? p = taxdetails & id = 129455 (accessed 20 October 2020)