Building on scientific literacy in evolution towards scientifically responsible Europeans, COST Action CA17127
Published December 16, 2019 | Version v1
Other Open

Key recommendations on science communication in Europe relating to health and food safety

Creators

  • 1. Research Centre on Didactics and Technology in the Education of Trainers, University of Aveiro, Portugal
  • 2. Swiss Academy of Sciences (SCNAT), Bern, Switzerland
  • 3. Milner Centre for Evolution, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom
  • 4. Institute of Environemntal Sciences, Jagiellonian University, Poland; School of Biological, Environmental and Earth Sciences, University of New South Wales, Australia
  • 5. University of Sussex, School of Education and Social Work, Falmer, Brighton, United Kingdom
  • 6. Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  • 7. Cercle FSER, Paris, France

Description

In the autumn of 2018, the European Commissioner for Health and Food Safety, Vytenis Andriukaitis, consulted EvoKE on several science communication issues important to social wellbeing and sustainable development in Europe. These included how to change people’s attitudes toward science, scientific knowledge, and how to communicate about risk, with a special emphasis on food-related issues. Our response, based on research in education and science communication was that simply providing access to information and facts (the so-called deficit model of science communication) is not sufficient. People build their positions and attitudes based on emotional factors and then engage in motivated reasoning, looking for and/or attaching greater value to evidence and experts that support their initial attitudes. Although more studies are needed, research already provides avenues to address this problem. In this document we use the most important lessons of the research to recommend solutions that can be applied, illustrated by case studies.

Files

evoke_dgsante_proof_2020.pdf

Files (4.8 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:67c0850b57aa0c79755503d2da7fb401
4.8 MB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • EvoKE, 'Promoting science literacy and evolutionary knowledge in Europe'. 2018.
  • Committee on the Science of Science Communication: A Research Agenda, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, and National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Communicating Science Effectively: A Research Agenda. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2017.
  • D. M. Kahan et al., 'Cultural Cognition of Scientific Consensus', Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY, SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 1549444, 2010.
  • D. M. Kahan et al., 'The Tragedy of the Risk-Perception Commons: Culture Conflict, Rationality Conflict, and Climate Change', SSRN Electron. J., 2011.
  • M. J. Hornsey and K. S. Fielding, 'Attitude roots and Jiu Jitsu persuasion: Understanding and overcoming the motivated rejection of science.', Am. Psychol., vol. 72, no. 5, pp. 459–473, 2017.
  • S. L. Rynes et al., 'When the "Best Available Evidence" Doesn't Win: How Doubts About Science and Scientists Threaten the Future of Evidence-Based Management', J. Manag., vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 2995–3010, 2018.
  • M. Rocard et al., 'Science Education now: a renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe'. Brussels: European Commission Directorate-General for Research Information and communication Unit, 2007.
  • N. R. Council, A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. 2011.
  • Partnership for 21st Century Learning, 'Framework for 21st century learning definitions'. Batelle for Kids, 2019.
  • D. Spiegelhalter, 'Risk and Uncertainty Communication', Annu. Rev. Stat. Its Appl., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 31–60, 2017.
  • J. A. Friedman, 'Priorities for Preventive Action: Explaining Americans' Divergent Reactions to 100 Public Risks', Am. J. Polit. Sci., vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 181–196, 2019.
  • E. Peters et al., 'Informing Patients: The Influence of Numeracy, Framing, and Format of Side Effect Information on Risk Perceptions', Med. Decis. Making, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 432–436, 2011.
  • C. Betsch and K. Sachse, 'Debunking vaccination myths: Strong risk negations can increase perceived vaccination risks.', Health Psychol., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 146–155, 2013.
  • P. DeCosta et al., 'Changing children's eating behaviour - A review of experimental research', Appetite, vol. 113, pp. 327–357, 2017.
  • Afonso, L et al., 'The taste of biodiversity: Sensory education and experimental work with different varieties of a vegetable to promote its acceptance. Appetite, submitted.
  • K. G. Grunert et al., 'Consumer interest in environmental impact, safety, health and animal welfare aspects of modern pig production: Results of a cross-national choice experiment', Meat Sci., vol. 137, pp. 123–129, 2018.
  • G. Hough and M. Sosa, 'Food choice in low income populations – A review', Food Qual. Prefer., vol. 40, pp. 334–342, 2015.
  • Leiserowitz, A. et al., 'Americans' actions to limit global warming, November 2013.' Yale University and George Mason University. New Haven, CT, 2014.
  • S. S. Andersen et al., 'Measuring the impact of classmates on children's liking of school meals', Food Qual. Prefer., vol. 52, pp. 87–95, 2016.
  • D. M. Kahan et al., 'Cultural Cognition of Scientific Consensus', SSRN Electron. J., 2010.
  • M. Marialva, 'Hands-on science to promote language learning in bilingual context.', ESERA Congress. Bologne, 2019.
  • T. Jenkins et al., 'Lausanne, capitale de l'évolution. Outreach events at ESEB 2015: final report.' 2015.
  • H. D. Dufour, 'SciSparks, How Do We Expose All High School Students to Science Being Made', in Hands-on Science: advancing science, improving education, 2018, pp. 372–373.
  • J. Ducret, '1400 scientifiques réunis à Lausanne pour sonder l'évolution', 24Heures, 08-Jun-2015.
  • 'Dix idées reçues sur la théorie de l'évolution - Le Temps'. https://www.letemps.ch/sciences/dix-idees-recues-theorie-levolution. [Accessed: 18-Dec-2019].
  • Cercle FSER, 'SciSparks', Cercle FSER. ttp://www.cerclefser.org/en. [Accessed: 18-Dec-2019].
  • K. A. Stofer et al., 'Casual conversations in everyday spaces can promote high public engagement with science', Int. J. Sci. Educ. Part B, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 296–311, 2019.
  • J. J. Sikkens et al., 'Behavioral Approach to Appropriate Antimicrobial Prescribing in Hospitals: The Dutch Unique Method for Antimicrobial Stewardship (DUMAS) Participatory Intervention Study', JAMA Intern. Med., vol. 177, no. 8, p. 1130, 2017.
  • L. W. van Buul et al., 'Participatory action research in antimicrobial stewardship: a novel approach to improving antimicrobial prescribing in hospitals and long-term care facilities', J. Antimicrob. Chemother., vol. 69, no. 7, pp. 1734–1741, 2014.
  • N. J. Bennett et al., 'Environmental Stewardship: A Conceptual Review and Analytical Framework', Environ. Manage., vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 597–614, 2018.
  • P. Mapfumo et al., 'Participatory action research (PAR) as an entry point for supporting climate change adaptation by smallholder farmers in Africa', Environ. Dev., vol. 5, pp. 6–22, 2013.
  • C. Cooperet al., 'Citizen Science as a Tool for Conservation in Residential Ecosystems', Ecol. Soc., vol. 12, no. 2, 2007.
  • 'Public engagement: a practical guide – Sense about Science'. http://senseaboutscience.org/activities/public-engagement-guide/. [Accessed: 16-Dec-2019].
  • 'Home Page - RRI Tools'. https://www.rri-tools.eu/. [Accessed: 16-Dec-2019].
  • 'ORION Open Science - Open Responsible research and Innovation to further Outstanding kNowledge'. https://www.orion-openscience.eu/. [Accessed: 16-Dec-2019].
  • T. Sadler et al., 'Learning science content through socio-scientific issues-based instruction: a multi-level assessment study', Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 38, pp. 1622–1635, 2016.
  • H. Lee et al., 'Socioscientific Issues as a Vehicle for Promoting Character and Values for Global Citizens', Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 2079–2113, 2013.
  • A. Peel et al., 'Students' model-based explanations about natural selection and antibiotic resistance through socio-scientific issues-based learning', Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 510–532, 2019.
  • B. Akcay and H. Akcay, 'Effectiveness of science-technology-society (STS) instruction on student understanding of the nature of science and attitudes toward science', Int. J. Educ. Math. Sci. Technol., vol. 3, pp. 37–45, 2015.
  • T. Klop et al., 'Effects of a Science Education Module on Attitudes towards Modern Biotechnology of Secondary School Students', Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 32, no. 9, pp. 1127–1150, 2010.