Typhlodromus (Anthoseius) bakeri
Creators
- 1. Montpellier SupAgro, UMR CBGP INRAE / IRD / CIRAD / SupAgro, Université de Montpellier, 755 Avenue du Campus Agropolis (Baillarguet), CS 30016, 34988 Montferrier-sur-Lez cedex, France.
- 2. University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical faculty, Department of Agronomy, Chair for Phytomedicine, Agricultural Engineering, Crop Production, Pasture and Grassland Management, Jamnikarjeva ulica 101, SI- 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Description
Typhlodromus (Anthoseius) bakeri (Garman)
Seiulus bakeri Garman, 1948: 15.
Typhlodromus (Neoseiulus) bakeri, Nesbitt 1951: 36-37.
Typhlodromus bakeri, Cunliffe & Baker 1953: 10.
Typhlodromus (Typhlodromus) bakeri, Chant 1959: 63.
Typhlodromella bakeri, Muma 1961: 299.
Amblydromella bakeri, Muma 1967: 267-280; Moraes et al. 1986: 155.
Mumaseius bakeri, Abbasova 1972: 10.
Anthoseius (Aphanoseius) bakeri, Wainstein 1972: 1477-1482.
Anthoseius bakeri, Beglyarov 1981: 24.
Amblydromella (Aphanoseia) bakeri, Denmark & Welbourn 2002: 308.
Typhlodromus (Anthoseius) bakeri, Moraes et al. 2004: 311; Chant & McMurtry 2007: 152. Anthoseius (Aphanoseius) clavatus Wainstein 1972: 1481 (synonymy according to Evans & Edland 1998).
Having setae S4, JV3 and JV4 present, setae on dorsal shield setiform approximately equal in length except for Z4 and Z 5, which are sometimes longer, setae r3 and R1 on lateral integument, and setae of z-Z and s-S series shorter than distances between their bases, this species belongs to the rhenanus species group.
Almost nothing is known about the biology of that species.
This species was already recorded from Slovenia (Miklavc 2006; Bohinc and Trdan 2013).
World distribution: Alaska, Armenia, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Canada, Caucasus Region, Czechoslovakia, Czech Republic, Denmark, England, Finland, France, Germany, Georgia, Greece, Hawaii, Hungary, India, Iran, Italy, Latvia, Montenegro, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine, USA.
Specimens examined: 28 ♀♀ and 7 ♂♂ in total. Škofljica, Gumnišče 15 (aasl 305 m, lat. 45°58’15”N, long. 14°34’17”E), 1 ♀ on Carpinus betulus L. (Betulaceae) and 1 ♂ on Rubus fruticosus L. (Rosaceae), 18/VI/2019; Kočevska Reka, Lake (aasl 567 m, 45°34’33”N, 14°47’25”E), 1 ♀ on Crateagus monogyna Jacquin (Rosaceae), 1 ♀ and 1 ♂ on Abies alba Miller (Pinaceae), and 1 ♀ on Corylus avellana L. (Betulaceae), 18/VI/2019; Ljubljana, Faculty of Biotechnology campus (aasl 307 m, lat. 46°02’54”N, long. 14°28’32”E), 1 ♀ on Cornus mas L. (Cornaceae), 18/VI/2019; Sečovlje, 58a (aasl 3 m, lat. 45°28’43”N, long. 13°37’28”E), 1 ♀ on Juglans regia L. (Juglandaceae), 19/VI/2019; Dragonja (aasl 3 m, lat. 45°27’32”N, long. 13°39’4”E), 3 ♀♀ and 1 ♂ on Prunus pumila L. (Rosaceae), 19/VI/2019; Pragersko, Kvedrova ulica (aasl 250 m, lat. 46°23’48”N, long. 13°40’11”E), 2 ♀♀ and 1 ♂ on Pinus sylvestris L. (Pinaceae), 20/VI/2019; Juršinci, Gabrnik 55 (aasl 301 m, 46°28’43”N, 15°58’2”E), 2 ♀♀ on Malus domestica L. (Rosaceae), and 2 ♀♀ on Prunus cerasus L. (Rosaceae), 20/VI/2019; Veržej, Near the football stadium (aasl 182 m, lat. 46°35’27”N, long. 16°10’1”E), 1 ♀ on Ulmus minor L. (Ulmaceae), 2 ♀♀ on Quercus robur L. (Fagaceae) and 2 ♀♀ on Fraxinus excelsior L. (Oleaceae), 20/VI/2019; Šobec (aasl 418 m, 46°21’22”N, 14°9’2”E), 1 ♀ on Picea abies (L.) H. Karsten (Pinaceae) and 1 ♀ and 1 ♂ on P. sylvestris, 2 ♀♀ and 1 ♂ on Q. robur, 1 ♀ and 1 ♂ on Prunus padus L. (Rosaceae) and 1 ♀ on F. excelsior, 21/VI/2019; Bled, Lake (aasl 478 m, lat. 46°22’4”N, long. 14°05’06”E), 1 ♀ on Alnus glutinosa L. (Betulaceae), 21/VI/2019; Kranj (aasl 434 m, 46°16’6”N, 14°20’26”E), 1 ♀ on C. mas, 21/VI/2019.
Remarks: The description and measurements of the adult females collected agree with those provided by Chant et al. (1974), by Karg (1982) and by Ferragut et al. (2010) for specimens from Spain.
Notes
Files
Files
(4.6 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:230e1c2e0fc4492608e5683f93e4d476
|
4.6 kB | Download |
System files
(45.8 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:89a41a5a205a2a0d8f752aacb916bceb
|
45.8 kB | Download |
Linked records
Additional details
Identifiers
Biodiversity
- Family
- Phytoseiidae
- Genus
- Typhlodromus
- Kingdom
- Animalia
- Order
- Mesostigmata
- Phylum
- Arthropoda
- Scientific name authorship
- Garman
- Species
- bakeri
- Taxon rank
- species
References
- Garman P. 1948. Mite species from apple trees in Connecticut. Connect. Agric. Exp. St. Bull., 520, 1 - 27.
- Nesbitt H. H. J. 1951. A taxonomic study of the Phytoseiinae (Family Laelaptidae) predaceous upon Tetranychidae of economic importance. Zool. Verhandel., 12: 1 - 96.
- Cunliffe F., Baker E. W. 1953. A guide to the predatory phytoseiid mites of the United States. Pinellas Biology Laboratory, Inc., USA, 1, 28 pp.
- Chant D. A. 1959. Phytoseiid mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Part I. Bionomics of seven species in southeastern England. Part II. A taxonomic review of the family Phytoseiidae, with descriptions of thirty-eight new species. Can. Entomol., 61 (12): 1 - 166. doi: 10.4039 / entm 9112 fv
- Muma M. H. 1961. Subfamiles, genera, and species of Phytoseiidae (Acarina: Mesostigmata). Fla St. Mus. Bul., 5 (7): 267 - 302.
- Muma M. H. 1967. New Phytoseiidae (Acarina: Mesostigmata) from southern Asia. Fla Entomol., 50, 267 - 280. doi: 10.2307 / 3493156
- Moraes G. J. de, McMurtry J. A., Denmark H. A. 1986. A catalog of the mite family Phytoseiidae. References to taxonomy, synonymy, distribution and habitat. EMBRAPA - DDT, Brasilia, Brazil, 353 pp.
- Abbasova E. D. 1972. Phytoseiid mites (Parasitiformes: Phytoseiidae) of Azerbaijan. Avtoreferat Dissertatsii na Soiskanie Uchenoy Stepeni Kandidata Biologicheskikh Nauk. Akadrmiya Nauk Azerbaydzhanskoy SSR, Institut Zoologii, Baku, Azerbaijan, 34 pp. [in Russian]
- Wainstein B. A. 1972. New species and subgenus of the genus Anthoseius (Parasitiformes, Phytoseiidae). Zoologicheskii Zhurnal, 51: 1477 - 1482 [in Russian].
- Beglyarov G. A. 1981. Keys to the determination of phytoseiid mites of the USSR. Information Bulletin International Organization for Biological Control of Noxious Animals and Plants, East Palaearctic Section, Leningrad, Russia, 2, 97 pp. [in Russian].
- Denmark H. A., Welbourn W. C. 2002. Revision of the genera Amblydromella Muma and Anthoseius De Leon (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Intern. J. Acarol., 28 (4): 291 - 316. doi: 10.1080 / 01647950208684308
- Moraes G. J. de, McMurtry J. A., Denmark H. A., Campos C. B. 2004. A revised catalog of the mite family Phytoseiidae. Zootaxa, 434: 1 - 494. doi: 10.11646 / zootaxa. 434.1.1
- Chant D. A., McMurtry J. A. 2007. Illustrated keys and diognoses for the genera and subgenera of the Phytoseiidae of the world (Acari: Mesostigmata). Indira Publishing House, West Bloomfield, 219 pp.
- Evans G. O., Edland T. 1998. The genus Anthoseius De Leon (Acari: Mesostigmata) in Norway. Fauna Norvegica, Ser. B, 45, 41 - 62.
- Miklavc J. 2006. Razsirjenost plenilskih prsic iz druzine Phytoseiidae v nasadih jablane v Podravju
- Bohinc T., Trdan S. 2013. Phytophagous and predatory mites in Slovenia. Acarologia, 53 (2): 145 - 150. doi: 10.1051 / acarologia / 20132084
- Chant D. A., Hansell R. I. C., Yoshida-Shaul E. 1974. The genus Typhlodromus Scheuten (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) in Canada and Alaska. Canad. J. Zool., 52, 1265 - 1291. doi: 10.1139 / z 74 - 168
- Karg W. 1982. Diagnostic and systematics of predatory mites of the family Phytoseiidae Berlese in orchards. Zool. Jahrb. Syst., 109: 188 - 210.
- Ferragut F., Perez Moreno I., Iraola V., Escudero A. 2010. Acaros depredadores em las plantas cultivadas. Familia Phytoseiidae. Ediciones Agrotecnicas, Madrid, 202 pp.