Published February 3, 2021 | Version v1
Conference paper Open

Naval Vessel Mission Fuel Expenditure Optimisation

  • 1. RINA, UK

Description

The requirement to maintain and uplift fuel in naval vessels is a necessary operating constraint and, with
projections forecasting that fuel oil prices will continue to rise, uplifts need to be scheduled to deconflict with
military tasking whilst being financially efficient. This paper presents mission fuel management as an optimisation
problem, where analytical techniques are used to explore the impact of intelligent uplifts, intelligent leg
speeds and the impact of minimum fuel holding restrictions and hull bio-fouling. Using a representative transit,
we demonstrate that relative fuel price differences between ports may be exploited to achieve mission fuel
cost savings of 15% to 25%, without impacting mission dates. For time constrained transits, being those with leg
speeds limited by the minimum fuel holding restriction, a saving of 4% to 5% is achievable by varying leg speeds.
Finally, we conclude that challenging minimum fuel holding requirements can yield up to 5% saving, whilst hull
bio-fouling has an almost negligible effect in our model (due to the short time at sea). Extrapolation indicates
that whilst fuel consumption will invariably increase for a given speed, it does not affect the fuel uplift decision
making.

Files

INEC_2020_Paper_92.pdf

Files (1.5 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:591a4d401c5168342e34a1d446172ea8
1.5 MB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • Barrass, C.B., 2004. Ship Design and Performance for Masters and Mates. Elsevier.
  • Hakim, M.L., A P Utama, I.K., Nugroho, B., Yusim, A.K., Baithal, M.S., Suastika, I.K., 2018. Review of Correlation Between Marine Fouling and Fuel Consumption on a Ship, in: SENTA 2017: 17th Conference on Marine Technology, Surabaya.
  • Hakim, M.L., Nugroho, B., Nurrohman, M.N., Suastika, I.K., Utama, I.K., 2019. Investigation of fuel consumption on an operating ship due to biofouling growth and quality of anti-fouling coating. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 339.
  • Kontovas, C.A., 2014. The Green Ship Routing and Scheduling Problem (GSRSP): A conceptual approach. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 31, 61–69.
  • Molland, A.F., Turnock, S.R., Hudson, D.A., 2011. Ship resistance and propulsion: Practical estimation of ship propulsive power. volume 9780521760. Elsevier Ltd.
  • Pescetto, A., 2019. Real cases of data driven Performance Management. Vessel Performance Optimisation, Oslo.
  • Psaraftis, H.N., Kontovas, C.A., 2014. Ship speed optimization: Concepts, models and combined speed-routing scenarios. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 44, 52–69.
  • Ronen, D., 1982. Effect of oil price on the optimal speed of ships. Journal of the Operational Research Society 33, 1035–1040.
  • Schultz, M.P., 2004. Frictional resistance of antifouling coating systems. Journal of Fluids Engineering, Transactions of the ASME 126, 1039–1047.
  • Schultz, M.P., 2007. Effects of coating roughness and biofouling on ship resistance and powering. Biofouling 23, 331–341.
  • Stopford, M., 2008. Maritime Economics. Third ed., Routledge.
  • Turan, O., Demirel, Y.K., Day, S., Tezdogan, T., 2016. Experimental Determination of Added Hydrodynamic Resistance Caused by Marine Biofouling on Ships. Transportation Research Procedia 14, 1649–1658.
  • Wang, S., Meng, Q., Liu, Z., 2013. Bunker consumption optimization methods in shipping: A critical review and extensions. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 53, 49–62.
  • Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, 1952. Marine Fouling and its Prevention. Technical Report. United States Naval Institute.
  • Yao, Z., Ng, S.H., Lee, L.H., 2012. A study on bunker fuel management for the shipping liner services. Computers and Operations Research 39, 1160–1172.