Planned intervention: On Wednesday June 26th 05:30 UTC Zenodo will be unavailable for 10-20 minutes to perform a storage cluster upgrade.
Published February 1, 2021 | Version v1.0
Software Open

ArcticBeach v1.0

  • 1. Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Center for Polar and Marine Research, Potsdam

Description

In the Arctic, air temperatures are increasing and sea ice is declining, resulting in larger waves and a longer open water season, all of which intensify the thaw and erosion of ice-rich coasts.  Climate change has been shown to increase the rate of Arctic coastal erosion, causing problems for Arctic cultural heritage, existing industrial, military, and civil infrastructure, as well as changes in nearshore biogeochemistry.  Numerical models that reproduce historical and project future Arctic erosion rates are necessary to understand how further climate change will affect these problems, and no such model yet exists to simulate the physics of erosion on a pan-Arctic scale. We have coupled a bathystrophic storm surge model to a simplified physical erosion model of a permafrost coastline. This Arctic erosion model, called ArcticBeach v1.0, is a first step toward a physical parameterization of Arctic shoreline erosion for larger-scale models.  It is forced by wind speeds and directions, wave period and height, sea surface temperature, all of which are masked during times of sea ice cover near the coastline. Model tuning requires observed historical retreat rates (at least one value), as well as rough nearshore bathymetry. These parameters are already available on a pan-Arctic scale.  The model is validated at three study sites at 1) Drew Point (DP), Alaska, 2) Mamontovy Khayata (MK), Siberia, and 3) Veslebogen Cliffs, Svalbard.  Simulated cumulative retreat rates for DP and MK respectively (169 and 170 m) over the time periods studied at each site (2007 - 2016, and 1995 - 2018) are found to be within the same order of magnitude as observed cumulative retreat rates (172 and 120 m).  The rocky Veslebogen cliffs have small observed cumulative retreat rates (0.05 m over the time period 2014-2016), and our model was also able to reproduce this same order of magnitude of retreat (0.08 m). Given the large differences in geomorphology and weather systems between the three study sites, this study provides a proof-of-concept that ArcticBeach v1.0 can be applied on very different permafrost coastlines.  This proof-of-concept model is flexible, based on input parameter choice (e.g. ice content, cliff height).  ArcticBeach v1.0 provides a promising starting point to project the retreat of Arctic shorelines, or to evaluate historical retreat in places that have had few observations. 

Notes

This work was financially made possible by Geo.X, the Research Network for Geosciences in Berlin and Potsdam. Grant number SO_087_GeoX.

Files

ArcticBeach-main.zip

Files (18.5 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:fbdb23b4796b36ad8015cbb828c7a4c7
18.5 MB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • Kobayashi, N., J. C. Vidrine, R. B. Nairn, & S. M. Soloman. (1999). Erosion of Frozen Cliffs Due to Storm Surge on Beaufort Sea Coast. Journal of Coastal Research, 15(2), 332-344. Retrieved February 1, 2021, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4298946
  • Freeman, J. C., Baer, L., and Jung, G. H.: The bathystrophic storm tide, Journal of Marine Research, 16, 1957.