Anthidium (Anthidium) manicatum
Description
Anthidium (Anthidium) manicatum (Linnaeus, 1758)
(Fig. 11 a–f, female; Fig. 12 a–j, male)
Apis manicata Linnaeus, 1758: 577, ♂.
Apis pervigil Harris, 1776: 162.
Apis maculata Fabricius, 1781: 482.
Apis fulvipes de Villers, 1789: 320. (Homonym, nec. Fabricius, 1793)
Apis modesta Christ, 1791: 141. (as modeſta)
Apis amoenita Christ, 1791: 141.
Apis uncata Schrank, 1802: 379.
Anthidium maculatum Panzer, 1806: 250.
Anthidium marginatum Latreille, 1809: 43, ♀.
Anthidium obtusatum Lepeletier, 1841: 362, ♂.
Anthidium barbarum Lepeletier, 1841: 357, ♂.
Anthidium productum Lepeletier, 1841: 400, ♀.
Anthidium manicatum var. nigrithorax Dalla Torre, 1877: 193.
Anthidium manicatum var. fasciatum Schirmer, 1915: 416.
Anthidium manicatum var. nasicolle Friese, 1917: 56, ♀; Rasmussen & Ascher, 2008: 74.
Anthidium manicatum var. luteus Gribodo, 1924: 31, ♂. (Homonym, nec Friese, 1897)
Anthidium manicatum subcrenulata Alfken, 1931: 842.
Anthidium (Anthidium) manicatum cyrenaica van der Zanden, 1992: 70. (Homonym, nec Gribodo, 1924 [= Anthidiellum (Anthidiellum) cyrenaicum (Gribodo, 1924)])
Anthidium (Anthidium) manicatum gribodoi Schwarz & Gusenleitner, 2003: 239, replacement name for Anthidium manicatum var. luteus Gribodo, 1924.
Anthidium (Anthidium) manicatum barbarum Lepeletier, 1841: Ornosa et al., 2008: 67.
Anthidium manicatum hissaricum Mavromoustakis, 1939b:377.
Anthidium manicatum (Linnaeus, 1758): Banaszak & Romasenko, 1998: 48, ♀ (key), Fig. VII-6; 51, ♂ (key), Fig. VII-8; 52; Urban, 2002: 499, ♂ (key), 500, ♀ (key), 509, Fig. 20.
Anthidium (Anthidium) manicatum (Linnaeus, 1758): Warncke, 1980: 135, ♀ (key), 145, ♂ (key), 197; Özbek & Zanden, 1993: 197; Rasmont, 1995: 54; Wu, 2006: 144, ♀ (key), 145, ♂ (key), 150, ♀, ♂ (redescription), Fig. 73; Proshchalykin, 2007: 6; 2013: 149 (key), Fig. 7, 151; Ornosa et al., 2008: 67; Aguib et al., 2010: 127; Gonzalez & Griswold, 2013: 242, ♀ (key), 246, ♂ (key), 320, ♀, ♂ (redescription), FIGS 1, 93, 173 (female), FIGS 34, 249, 310, 375, 451, 528 (male), MAP, FIG. 3; Nadimi et al., 2014: 419; Murao et al., 2015: 9.
Diagnosis: Females can be recognized by the following combination of characters: clypeus with distal margin strongly tuberculate; basitarsi with outer surfaces densely covered by dense tomentum; and hind tibia with carina. Males are easily recognized by the T2–T5 with strong lateral protuberances surmounted by tufts of long hairs and T7 with two strong lateral and one median spiniform projections ( Gonzalez & Griswold, 2013).
Material examined: China, Xinjiang: Altay Shi, Tala (47º53′N, 87º55′E), 930 m, 3 ♂, 1 ♀, 14.VIII.1960, leg. Shu-Yong WANG, Altay Bridge (47º53′N, 87º55′E), 1050 m, 1 ♀, 10.VIII.1960, leg. Shu-Yong WANG; Qinghe Xian, Hualing Park (46º41′N, 90º21′E), 233 m, 1 ♂, 7.VIII.2007, leg. no information on the label.
Type localities. Europe: likely Sweden (manicatum), United Kingdom: England (pervigil), Italy (maculatum), France (fulvipes), Germany (amoenitum, modestum), Germany: Bavaria: Ingolstadt (uncatum), Algeria: Oran (barbarum), Algeria? (productum), Palearctic: France? (marginatum, obtusatum), Austria: Tyrol: Innsbruck vicinity (nigrithorax), Germany: Brandenburg (fasciatum); Russia: Irkutsk (nasicolle), Libya: Al Marj (as Merg) (gribodoi), Tajikistan: Badakhshoni Kuni: lower Kitschik-Mardjanai [interpreted as Mardz], western valley (subcrenulatum), Tajikistan: Sogd: Kvak, Varzob River Valley, Hissar [Gissar] Mountains (hissaricum).
Distribution: Present across much of the Palearctic from North Africa and Portugal to China and Russia including Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Libya, Portugal, Spain, United Kingdom, France, Belgium, Italy, Austria, Switzerland, Germany, Greece, Bulgaria, Czechia, Denmark, Hungary, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Italy, Malta, Netherlands, Poland, Norway, Finland, Slovakia, Sweden, Croatia, Bosnia, Herzegovina, Serbia, North Macedonia, Albania, Romania, Slovenia, Estonia, Latvia, Syria, Lebanon, Israel, Turkey, Ukraine, Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Iran, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan (Jalal-Abad), Tajikistan (Badakhshoni Kuni, Sogd), Russia (European part, Urals, Siberia), and China (Xinjiang). Also widely adventive including the Americas (central Chile, Peru, Argentina, Paraguay, Uruguay, southeastern Brazil, Canada from Newfoundland to British Columbia, U.S.A. from Maine to Georgia and west to New Mexico and California) and New Zealand.
Floral association: Acanthus sp. (Acanthaceae), Gomphrena globose (Amaranthaceae), Aster sp., Cirsium sp., Erigeron sp., Gaillardia sp., Senecio cineraria, Solidago sp. (Asteraceae), Echium vulgare (Boraginaceae), Sempervivum tectorum (Crassulaceae), Baptisia alba, Coronilla sp., Cytisus sp., Lotus corniculatus, Lupinus polyphyllus, Medicago sp., Robinia hispida, Trifolium sp. (Fabaceae), Ballota nigra, Betonica sp., Caryopteris clandonensis, Galeopsis tetrahit, Lamium maculatum, Lamium maculatum alba, Melissa officinalis, Nepeta cataria, Nepeta mussinii, Ocimum balisicum, Perovskia atriplicifolia, Physostegia virginiana, Salvia farinacea, Salvia haematodes, Salvia horminum, Salvia officinalis, Salvia pratensis, Salvia superba, Stachys grandiflora, Stachys byzantina (Lamiaceae), Cuphea sp., Lythrum salicaria (Lythraceae), Lavatera sp. (Malvaceae), Antirrhinum majus, Digitalis purpurea, Linaria purpurea, Linaria vulgaris, Penstemon digitalis, Veronica sp. (Plantaginaceae), Caryopteris clandonensis (Verbenaceae) (Banaszak & Romasenko, 1998; Gonzalez & Griswold, 2013 ).
Remarks: Wu (2006) misidentified the specimen “ China, Inner Mongolia: Alxa Meng, Ejin Qi (41º54′N, 101º00′E), 1 ♀, 8.VIII.1987, leg. Zhu-Zhu ZHANG” as this species, but it has been reexamined and is found to be A. (A.) florentinum (Fabricius, 1775), so this species currently only occurs within Xinjiang in China. Furthermore, Wu (2006) recorded three specimens collected from Xinjiang, Taxkorgan (1 ♀, 1 ♂) and Akto (1 ♂) as this species, but by comparation the S8 and genitalia of the male, we can confirm that they are A. (A.) xuezhongi Niu & Zhu, sp. nov., as its apical process of S8 is trifid (Fig. 34h), ventral margin at sub-middle part of gonostylus emarginated and with a small acute projection (Fig. 34j).
Although this is a widespread species very well known in Europe, its full synonymy and distribution have rarely been cited. Putative subspecies described from Algeria (barbarum), Libya (gribodoi), and especially Tajikistan (hissaricum, subcrenulatum) are relatively poorly known and their status needs to be restudied, preferably with molecular diagnostics in addition to detailed morphological study.
Notes
Files
Files
(8.3 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:f32f99d4c3ad418dc207d70822e555e4
|
8.3 kB | Download |
System files
(88.1 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:f7d89ed481e90a5f5172f67c0aad8a53
|
88.1 kB | Download |
Linked records
Additional details
Identifiers
Biodiversity
- Collection code
- WANG
- Event date
- 1960-08-10
- Family
- Megachilidae
- Genus
- Anthidium
- Kingdom
- Animalia
- Order
- Hymenoptera
- Phylum
- Arthropoda
- Scientific name authorship
- Linnaeus
- Species
- manicatum
- Taxon rank
- species
- Verbatim event date
- 1960-08-10/2007-08-07
- Taxonomic concept label
- Anthidium (Anthidium) manicatum (Linnaeus, 1758) sec. Niu, Yuan, Ascher, Kasparek, Orr, Griswold & Zhu, 2020
References
- Linnaeus, C. (1758) Systema Naturae per Regna Tria Naturae, secundum Classes, Ordines, Genera, Species, cum Characteribus, Differentiis, Synonymis, Locis. Tomus I. Editio Decima Reformata. Laurentii Salvii, Holmiae [Stockholm], 4 + 823 + 5 pp. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 542
- Harris, M. (1776 [1776 - 1780]) An exposition of English insects, with curious observations and remarks, wherein each insect is particularly described; its parts and properties considered; the different sexes distinguished, and the natural history faithfully related. Robson & Co., London, viii + 166 + 4 (index) pp., 50 pls. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 122956
- Fabricius, J. C. (1781) Species Insectorum exhibentes eorum differentias specificas, synonyma auctorum, loca natalia, metamorphosin, adjectis observationibus, descriptionibus. Vol. 1. Hamburgi et Kilonii, Bohn, viii + 552 pp. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 36509
- Villers, C. de (1789) Caroli Linnaei entomologia, faunae Suecicae descriptionibus aucta; DD. Scopoli, Geoffroy, De Geer, Fabricii, Schrank & c. speciebus vel in systemate non enumeratis, vel nuperrime detectis, vel speciebus Galliae Australis locupletata, generum specierumque rariorum iconibus ornata. Tomus tertius. Piestre & Delamolliere, Lugduni, 657 pp.
- Christ, J. L. (1791) Naturgeschichte, Klassification und Nomenclatur der Insekten, vom Bienen, Wespen und Ameisengeschlecht; als der funften Klasse funfte Ordnung des Linneischen Natursystems von den Insekten: Hymenoptera. Mit hautigen Flugeln. Mit LX. ausgemalten Kupfertafeln in einem besonderen Band, und einem ausgemalten Titelkupfer. Frankfurt am Main, Hermann, 535 pp., 60 pls. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 87724
- Schrank, F. (1802) Fauna Boica. Durchgedachte Geschichte der in Baiern einheimischen und zahmen Thiere. 2 (2). Krull, Ingolstadt, 412 pp.
- Panzer, G. W. F. (1806) Kritische Revision der Insektenfauna Deutschlands. Vol. 2. Felssecker, Nurnberg, 271 pp., 2 pls.
- Latreille, P. A. (1809) Memoire sur le genre d'Anthide, Anthidium, de Fabricius, classe des Insectes, ordre des Hymenopteres, famille des Apiares. Annales du Museum d'Histoire naturelle, 13, 24 - 53 + 207 - 234.
- Lepeletier de Saint-Fargeau, A. L. M. (1841) Histoire Naturelle des Insectes-Hymenopteres. Vol. 2. Roret, Paris, 680 pp.
- Dalla Torre, C. G. de. (1877) Die Apiden Tirols, Fortsetzung und Schluss. Tirol: Z. Ferdinand, 3 (21), 159 - 196.
- Schirmer, C. (1915) Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Hymenopterenfauna der Provinz Brandenburg. Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift, 1915, 454 - 457. https: // doi. org / 10.1002 / mmnd. 48019150412
- Friese, H. (1917) Neue Arten der Bienengattung Anthidium (Hym.). (Pala ¨ arktische Region und von Formosa). Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift, 1917, 49 - 60.
- Rasmussen, C. & Ascher, J. S. (2008) Heinrich Friese (1860 - 1948): Names proposed and notes on a pioneer melittologist (Hymenoptera, Anthophila). Zootaxa, 1833 (1), 1 - 118. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 1833.1.1
- Gribodo, G. (1924) Missione zoologica del Dr. E. Festa in Cirenaica. X. Hymenoptera aculeata (parte II). Bollettino dei Musei di Zoologia ed Anatomia comparata della R. Universita di Torino, 39 (16), 1 - 52.
- Friese, H. (1897) Species aliquot novae vel minus cognitae generis Anthidum Fabr. Termeszetrajzi Fuzetek, 20, 437 - 441.
- Alfken, J. D. (1931) Entomologische Ergebnisse der Deutsch-Russischen Alai-Pamir-Expedition 1928 (II). 1. Hymenoptera IV. Apidae. Mitteilungen aus dem Zoologischen Museum in Berlin, 16 (6), 823 - 844.
- Zanden, G. van der (1992) Neue oder unvollstandig bekannte Arten palaarktischer Bauchsammler (Hymenoptera, Aculeata, Apoidea, Megachilidae). Linzer biologische Beitrage, 24 (1), 65 - 74.
- Schwarz, M. & Gusenleitner, F. (2003) Ergebnis der Untersuchung einiger von Spinola beschriebener Apiden mit Bemerkung und Erganzungen. Entomofauna, 24 (17), 237 - 280.
- Ornosa, C., Ortiz-Sainchez, F. J. & Torres, F. (2008) Catalogo de los Megachilidae del Mediterraneo occidental (Hymenoptera, Apoidea). III. Anthidiini y Dioxyini. Graellsia, 64, 61 - 86. https: // doi. org / 10.3989 / graellsia. 2008. v 64. i 1.55
- Mavromoustakis, G. A. (1939 b) On the anthidiine bees of Hissar Mountains (Tadzhikistan). Journal of Natural History, Series 11, 3 (15), 376 - 388. https: // doi. org / 10.1080 / 03745481.1939.9723613
- Banaszak, J. & Romasenko, L. (1998) Megachilid Bees of Europe (Hymenoptera, Apoidea, Megachilidae). Pedagogical University of Bydgoszcz, Bydgoszcz, 239 pp.
- Warncke, K. (1980) Die Bienengattung Anthidium Fabricius, 1804 in der Westpalaarktis und im turkestanischen Becken. Entomofauna, 1, 119 - 209.
- O ¨ zbek, H. & Zanden, G. van der (1993) A preliminary review of the Megachilidae of Turkey. Part III. The Anthidiini (Hymenop- tera: Apoidea). Turkish Journal of Entomology, 17 (4), 193 - 207.
- Rasmont, P., Ebmer, A. P., Banaszak, J. & Zanden, G. van der (1995) Hymenoptera Apoidea Gallica-Liste taxonomique des abeilles de France, de Suisse et du Grand-Duche de Luxembourg. Bulletin de la Societe entomologique de France, 100, 1 - 98.
- Wu, Y. - R. (2006) Fauna Sinica Insecta. Vol. 44. Hymenoptera. Megachilidae. Science Press, Beijing, xvi + 474 pp.
- Proshchalykin, M. Yu. (2007) The bees of family Megachilidae (Hymenoptera, Apoidea) of Transbaikalia. Far Eastern Entomologist, 175, 1 - 18.
- Proshchalykin, M. Yu. (2013) The bees of the tribe Anthidiini Ashmead, 1899 (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Megachilidae) of Siberia and the Russian Far East. Caucasian Entomological Bulletin, 9 (1), 147 - 158. [in Russian] https: // doi. org / 10.23885 / 1814 - 3326 - 2013 - 9 - 1 - 147 - 158
- Aguib, S., Louadi, K. & Schwarz, M. (2010) Les Anthidiini (Megachilidae, Megachilinae) d'Algeirie avec trois espeIces nouvelles pour ce pays: Anthidium (Anthidium) florentinum (FABRICIUS, 1775), Anthidium (Proanthidium) amabile ALFKEN, 1932 et Pseudoanthidium (Exanthidium) enslini (ALFKEN, 1928). Entomofauna, 31 (12), 121 - 152.
- Gonzalez, V. H. & Griswold, T. (2013) Wool carder bees of the genus Anthidium in the Western Hemisphere (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae): diversity, host plant associations, phylogeny, and biogeography. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 168, 221 - 425. https: // doi. org / 10.1111 / zoj. 12017
- Nadimi, A., Talebi, A. A., Zhu, C. D. & Fathipour, Y. (2014) Study of the tribe Anthidiini (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) in northern Iran, with the description of a new species. North-Western Journal of Zoology, 10 (2), 413 - 424.
- Murao, R., Tadauchi, O. & Miyanaga, R. (2015) The Bee tribe Anthidiini (Hymenoptera, Megachilidae) collected from Central Asia. J apanese Journal of Systematic Entomology, 21 (1), 7 - 12.
- Fabricius, J. C. (1775) Systema entomologiae, systens Insectorum classes, ordines, genera, species, adjectis synonymis, locis, descriptionibus, observationibus. Korte, Flensburgi et Lipsiae, xxviii + 832 pp. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 36510