Published November 30, 2020 | Version v1
Journal article Open

CURRENT STATE OF APPLIENCE ZIRCONIUM DIOXIDE IN BIOENGINEERING

  • 1. Ukrainian State University of Railway Transport

Description

This descriptive review presents current knowledge about the bioengineering use of a zirconium dioxide, the advantages and disadvantages of the material, and the prospects for research in this direction. The work reflects the success of the practical application of the zirconium dioxide as a material for dental structures and biological implants. Such practical characteristics, such as color-stability, chemical stability, good aesthetics, biocompatibility and durability, allowed to actively use the zirconium dioxide as a material for producing various dental structures. In comparison with other ceramics, the presence of high-performance of strength and fracture toughness of the zirconium dioxide enables the use of this material as an alternative material for the reconstructions in the readings with considerable loads. High hardness determines the zirconium dioxide as an excellent material for articular prostheses, because of its hardness, provides a low level of wear and excellent biocompatibility. However, along with positive characteristics, a widespread practical problem of using the zirconium dioxide in dentistry is a chip or fracture of veneering ceramics. It has also been reported that there is a shortage of orthopedic implants such as hydrothermal stability. The solution of such problems is indicated and the use of composite materials based on the zirconium dioxide, which allows to solve a similar problem, as well as to increase the service life and reliability of orthopedic implants by providing a higher fracture toughness and mechanical strength. The existence of such composite materials based on the zirconium dioxide provides a significant increase in the wear resistance of orthopedic implants, which is essential for successful prosthetics

Files

CURRENT STATE OF APPLIENCE ZIRCONIUM DIOXIDE IN BIOENGINEERING.pdf

Files (129.4 kB)

Additional details

References

  • Silva, N. R. F. A., Sailer, I., Zhang, Y., Coelho, P. G., Guess, P. C., Zembic, A., Kohal, R. J. (2010). Performance of Zirconia for Dental Healthcare. Materials, 3 (2), 863–896. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma3020863
  • Meyenberg, K. H., Lüthy, H., Schärer, P. (1995). Zirconia Posts: A New All-Ceramic Concept for Nonvital Abutment Teeth. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 7 (2), 73–80. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1995.tb00565.x
  • Oblak, C., Jevnikar, P., Kosmac, T., Funduk, N., Marion, L. (2004). Fracture resistance and reliability of new zirconia posts. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 91 (4), 342–348. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.01.009
  • Scarano, A., Piattelli, M., Caputi, S., Favero, G. A., Piattelli, A. (2004). Bacterial Adhesion on Commercially Pure Titanium and Zirconium Oxide Disks: An In Vivo Human Study. Journal of Periodontology, 75 (2), 292–296. doi: https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2004.75.2.292
  • Keith, O., Kusy, R. P., Whitley, J. Q. (1994). Zirconia brackets: An evaluation of morphology and coefficients of friction. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 106 (6), 605–614. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-5406(94)70085-0
  • Schmitt, J., Goellner, M., Lohbauer, U., Wichmann, M., Reich, S. (2013). Zirconia posterior fixed partial dentures: 5-year clinical results of a prospective clinical trial. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 109 (5), 340. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3913(13)60313-3
  • Von Steyern, P. V., Carlson, P., Nilner, K. (2005). All-ceramic fixed partial dentures designed according to the DC-ZirkonR technique. A 2-year clinical study. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 32 (3), 180–187. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01437.x
  • Roe, P., Kan, J. Y. K., Rungcharassaeng, K., Won, J. B. (2011). Retrieval of a Fractured Zirconia Implant Abutment Using a Modified Crown and Bridge Remover: A Clinical Report. Journal of Prosthodontics, 20 (4), 315–318. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849x.2011.00696.x
  • Blaschke, C., Volz, U. (2006). Soft and hard tissue response to zirconium dioxide dental implants--a clinical study in man. Neuro endocrinology letters, 27 (1), 69–72.
  • Shetty, P. (2016). Efficacy of zirconia crowns: A 3 year retrospective and clinical follow up study. Journal of Advanced Medical and Dental Sciences Research, 4 (4), 96–100. doi: https://doi.org/10.21276/jamdsr.2016.4.4.21
  • Traini, T., Sorrentino, R., Gherlone, E., Perfetti, F., Bollero, P., Zarone, F. (2015). Fracture Strength of Zirconia and Alumina Ceramic Crowns Supported by Implants. Journal of Oral Implantology, 41 (S1), 352–359. doi: https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-d-13-00142
  • Güncü, M. B., Cakan, U., Aktas, G., Güncü, G. N., Canay, Ş. (2016). Comparison of implant versus tooth-supported zirconia-based single crowns in a split-mouth design: a 4-year clinical follow-up study. Clinical Oral Investigations, 20 (9), 2467–2473. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1763-x
  • Clarke, D. R., Schwartz, B. (1987). Transformation toughening of glass ceramics. Journal of Materials Research, 2 (6), 801–804. doi: https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.1987.0801
  • Rojas-Vizcaya, F. (2011). Full Zirconia Fixed Detachable Implant-Retained Restorations Manufactured from Monolithic Zirconia: Clinical Report after Two Years in Service. Journal of Prosthodontics, 20 (7), 570–576. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849x.2011.00784.x
  • Al-Wahadni, A., Shahin, A., Kurtz, K. S. (2016). An In Vitro Investigation of Veneered Zirconia-Based Restorations Shade Reproducibility. Journal of Prosthodontics, 27 (4), 347–354. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12489
  • Sailer, I., Fehér, A., Filser, F., Gauckler, L. J., Lüthy, H., Hämmerle, C. H. (2007). Five-year clinical results of zirconia frameworks for posterior fixed partial dentures. The International journal of prosthodontics, 20 (4), 383–388.
  • Rosentritt, M., Ries, S., Kolbeck, C., Westphal, M., Richter, E.-J., Handel, G. (2009). Fracture characteristics of anterior resin-bonded zirconia-fixed partial dentures. Clinical Oral Investigations, 13 (4), 453–457. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-009-0254-8
  • Zarone, F., Di Mauro, M. I., Spagnuolo, G., Gherlone, E., Sorrentino, R. (2020). Fourteen-year evaluation of posterior zirconia-based three-unit fixed dental prostheses. Journal of Dentistry, 101, 103419. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103419
  • Raigrodski, A. J., Chiche, G. J., Potiket, N., Hochstedler, J. L., Mohamed, S. E., Billiot, S., Mercante, D. E. (2006). The efficacy of posterior three-unit zirconium-oxide–based ceramic fixed partial dental prostheses: A prospective clinical pilot study. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 96 (4), 237–244. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.08.010
  • Rinke, S., Gersdorff, N., Lange, K., Roediger, M. (2013). Prospective Evaluation of Zirconia Posterior Fixed Partial Dentures: 7-Year Clinical Results. The International Journal of Prosthodontics, 26 (2), 164–171. doi: https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.3229
  • Beuer, F., Edelhoff, D., Gernet, W., Sorensen, J. A. (2009). Three-year clinical prospective evaluation of zirconia-based posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDPs). Clinical Oral Investigations, 13 (4), 445–451. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-009-0249-5
  • Abdulla, M., Ali, H., Jamel, R. (2020). CAD-CAM Technology: A literature review. Al-Rafidain Dental Journal, 20 (1), 95–113. doi: https://doi.org/10.33899/rden.2020.164542
  • Talic, R., Alfadda, S. A. (2018). Internal Adaptation of Implant-Supported, Polymer-Infused Ceramic Crowns Fabricated by Two CAD/CAM Systems. Journal of Prosthodontics, 27 (9), 868–876. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12977
  • Sorrentino, R., De Simone, G., Tetè, S., Russo, S., Zarone, F. (2011). Five-year prospective clinical study of posterior three-unit zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses. Clinical Oral Investigations, 16 (3), 977–985. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-011-0575-2
  • Piosik, A., Gajdus, P., Niedźwiecki, T., Hędzelek, W. (2016). Implementation of zirconia-based implant abutments in implant prosthodontic treatment. Part II. A case report. Prosthodontics, 66 (1), 33–40. doi: https://doi.org/10.5604/.1196053
  • Kohal, R.-J., Klaus, G., Strub, J. R. (2006). Zirconia-implant-supported all-ceramic crowns withstand long-term load: a pilot investigation. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 17 (5), 565–571. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01252.x
  • Güers, P., Wille, S., Strunskus, T., Polonskyi, O., Kern, M. (2019). Durability of resin bonding to zirconia ceramic after contamination and the use of various cleaning methods. Dental Materials, 35 (10), 1388–1396. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2019.07.027
  • De Aza, A. H., Chevalier, J., Fantozzi, G., Schehl, M., Torrecillas, R. (2001). Crack Growth Resistance of Zirconia Toughened Alumina Ceramics for Joint Prostheses. Key Engineering Materials, 206-213, 1535–1538. doi: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.206-213.1535
  • Piconi, C., Maccauro, G. (1999). Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial. Biomaterials, 20 (1), 1–25. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-9612(98)00010-6
  • Pratap, A., Kumar, P., Singh, G. P., Mandal, N., Singh, B. K. (2020). Effect of indentation load on mechanical properties and evaluation of tribological properties for zirconia toughened alumina. Materials Today: Proceedings, 26, 2442–2446. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.519