There is a newer version of the record available.

Published October 9, 2020 | Version 2.0.0
Dataset Open

Community Established Best Practice Recommendations for Tephra Studies-from Collection through Analysis

  • 1. University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
  • 2. Universite de Geneve, Geneve, Switzerland
  • 3. SUNY Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
  • 4. University of Bristol, Bristol UK
  • 5. Swansea University, Swansea, UK
  • 6. University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
  • 7. Concord University, WV, USA
  • 8. University of Maine, Orono, ME, USA
  • 9. University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
  • 10. Queen's University, Belfast, Northern Ireland
  • 11. University of Oxford, UK
  • 12. Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
  • 13. University of Iceland,Reykjavík, Iceland
  • 14. University of Kansas, Lawrence, KA, USA
  • 15. US Geological Survey, Alaska Volcano Observatory, Anchorage, USA

Description

Tephra is a unique volcanic product that plays an unparalleled role in understanding past eruptions, long-term behavior of volcanoes, and the effects of volcanism on climate and the environment. Tephra deposits also provide spatially widespread, extremely high-resolution time-stratigraphic markers across a range of sedimentary settings and are used in a range of disciplines (e.g., volcanology, seismotectonics, climate science, archaeology, ecology, public health and impact assessment). Nonetheless, the study of tephra deposits is challenged by a lack of standardization that often inhibits data integration amongst geographic regions and across disciplines. 

Here we present comprehensive recommendations for tephra data gathering that were community-developed via an inclusive process. These recommendations will help expand the applicability and usability of tephra data, thereby fostering scientific collaboration and data reuse. Recommendations include standardized field and laboratory data collection and reporting and correlation guidance, developed as tabulated lists of key pieces of information with their definition and purpose. This new standardized framework will facilitate consistent tephra documentation and parametrization, foster interdisciplinary communication, and improve the effectiveness of data sharing among diverse communities of researchers.

For additional details, see the accompanying manuscript that will be submitted to Nature Scientific Data in October 2020:

Wallace, K.*, Bursik, M. Kuehn, S., Kurbatov, A., Abbott, P., Bonadonna, C., Cashman, K., Davies, S., Jensen, B., Lane, C., Plunkett, G., Smith, V. Tomlinson, E., Thordarsson, T., and Walker, D. Community Established Best Practice Recommendations for Tephra Studies-from Collection through Analysis. (Scientific Data: SDATA-20-01163, in review: 2020).

*corresponding author:  Kristi Wallace, kwallace@usgs.gov

Files

Best_Practice_Guidelines_MSExcel.zip

Files (697.7 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:6ec58a1d8864d585d4bcd06f0a60e997
460.5 kB Preview Download
md5:b34ac6b8f073de091317e4d9304bcc67
176.7 kB Preview Download
md5:948c8b67e2cb2b82fa00df98dd4ae649
1.3 kB Preview Download
md5:7601907fab7c78a99df930a493afaee1
54.0 kB Preview Download
md5:7c1351b7790a02f50e0e7b27fc5c14bd
5.1 kB Preview Download