Journal article Open Access

Outlines of a probabilistic evaluation of possible SARS-CoV-2 origins

Demaneuf, Gilles; De Maistre, Rodolphe

We explore the relative probabilities of a lab-related accident against a non-lab-related zoonotic event being at the root of the current COVID-19 pandemic. We show that, based on present knowledge, the relative probability of a lab-related accident against a non-lab related zoonotic event is not negligible across a wide range of defensible input probabilities.

For instance, under a reference set of input probabilities, the relative probabilities are at least 55% for a lab-related event against 45% at most for a non-lab-related zoonotic event. Even under a particularly conservative set of assumptions the relative probability of the lab-related accident is still 6% (to 94% for the non-lab related zoonotic event).

Through a review of the Chinese specialised literature, we further show that our underlying estimate for the probability of lab-acquired infection is consistent with risk assessments from Chinese authorities and specialists. As part of this study, we list 112 individual BSL-3 labs in China, across 62 lab complexes.

We then review a list of common probabilistic misunderstandings that are often associated with discussions about COVID-19 origins and conclude by discussing how such a probabilistic treatment can also offer a way to properly guide an investigation into the causes of the pandemic while being able to embrace different estimates of the underlying probabilities.

This paper comes with a spreadsheet listing 112 individual BSL-3 labs in China across 62 lab-complexes.
Files (1.5 MB)
Name Size
BSL3_Labs_In_China.xlsx
md5:af43ce6dba50c712424af24bbc94b81a
91.4 kB Download
Probabilistic_Treatment_zenodo.pdf
md5:549382b4ed74dbfd3c200ab67cd31305
1.4 MB Download
4,274
2,157
views
downloads
All versions This version
Views 4,2742,833
Downloads 2,1571,381
Data volume 2.4 GB1.7 GB
Unique views 3,6172,604
Unique downloads 1,8371,201

Share

Cite as