Published May 7, 2020 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Assessment of semantic similarity in entities under monitoring: A systematic literature mapping

Creators

  • 1. Universidad Nacional de La Pampa

Contributors

  • 1. Universidad de Antioquia

Description

The detection and evaluation of semantically similar entities in measurement projects is a key asset for real-time decision making because it allows reusing their knowledge and previous experiences. In this way, the objective of this work is to map the thematic area of data stream processing to identify the topics that have been investigated in the detection of semantically similar entities. From the methodological point of view, a systematic mapping study was conducted obtaining 2,122 articles. Thus, 111 were kept refining the search strategy, and 25 were considered once the filters were applied jointly with the inclusion/exclusion criteria. After reading the 25 documents, just 6 were pertinent and allowed answering the research questions aligned with the research objective. The semantic similarity applied to entities under monitoring in the measurement and evaluation projects is a challenge. Real-time decision making depends on the obtained measures, the monitored entity, and the context in which it is immersed.

Files

340028-Article Text-194911-3-10-20200915.pdf

Files (884.3 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:4e248827c33dedde5cd19dbf20ecc7a3
884.3 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • M. J. Diván. (2012) Fundamentos sobre Tecnología de la información para las Ciencias Económicas. [La Pampa: Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Jurídicas (Universidad Nacional de La Pampa)]. [Online]. Available: https://bit.ly/2xJj7J3
  • G. Rossi and D. Schwabe, "Modeling and implementing web applications with oohdm," in Web Engineering: Modelling and Implementing Web Applications, G.Rossi, O. Pastor, D. Schwabe, and L. Olsina, Eds. Springer, 2008, pp. 109–156.
  • M. G. Mendonça and V. R. Basili, "Validation of an approach for improving existing measurement frameworks," IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 26, no. 6, June 2000. [Online]. Available: https://doi/10.1109/32.852739
  • F. Coallier, "A vision for international standardization in software and systems engineering," in 6 thInternational Conference on the Quality of Information and Communications Technology (QUATIC 2007), Lisbon, Portugal, 2007, pp. 3–11.
  • P. Becker, P. Lew, and L. Olsina, "Strategy to improve quality for software applications:A process view]," in ICSSP '11: Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Software and Systems Process, 2011, pp. 129–138.
  • M. Diván and M. L. Sanchéz, "Fostering the interoperability of the measurement and evaluation project definitions in PAbMM," in 2018 7 th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (Trends and Future Directions) (ICRITO), Noida, India, 2019, pp. 231–238.
  • M. J. Divan, "Processing architecture based on measurement metadata," in 2016 5th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (Trends and Future Directions) (ICRITO), Noida, India, 2016, pp. 6–15.
  • M. A. Martin and M. J. Divan, "Case based organizational memory for processing architecture based on measurement metadata," in 2016 5th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (Trends and Future Directions) (ICRITO), Noida, India, 2016.
  • P. Runeson and M. Höst, "Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering," Empir. Softw. Eng., vol. 14, no. 131, 2009. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10664-008-9102-8
  • J. M. Verner, J. Sampson, V. Tosic, N. A. Abu, and B. A. Kitchenham, "Guidelines for industrially-based multiple case studies in software engineering," in 2009 Third International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science, Fez, Morocco, 2009, pp. 313–324.
  • D. Budgen and P. Brereton, "Performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering," in Proceeding of the 28th international conference on Software engineering - ICSE '06, Shanghai, China, 2006, pp. 1051–1052.
  • P. Runeson and M. Höst, "Using mapping studies as the basis for further research – A participant-observer case study," Inf. Softw. Technol., vol. 53, no. 6, June 2011. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2010.12.011
  • K. Petersen, S. Vakkalanka, and L. Kuzniarz, "Guidelines for conducting systematic mapping studies in software engineering: An update," Inf. Softw. Technol., vol. 64, August 2015. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2015.03.007
  • D. Carrizo and C. Ortiz, "Models of requirements elicitation process: A systematic mapping," Ing. Desarro., vol. 34, no. 1, January 2016. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.14482/indc.33.2.6368
  • A. R. Cárdenas and et al, "A systematic mapping study of process mining," Enterp. Inf. Syst., vol. 12, no. 5, November 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/17517575.2017.1402371
  • A. Idri, I. Abnane, and A. Abran, "Systematic mapping study of missing values techniques in software engineering data," in 2015 IEEE/ACIS 16th International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing (SNPD), Takamatsu, Japan, 2015, pp. 1–8.
  • V. H. Durelli and et al, "Machine learning applied to software testing: A systematic mapping study," IEEE Trans. Reliab., vol. 68, no. 3, September 11 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/TR. 2019.2892517
  • I. D. López, A. Figueroa, and J. C. Corrales, "Un mapeo sistemático sobre predicción de calidad del agua mediante técnicas de inteligencia computacional," Rev. Ing. Univ. Medellín, vol. 15, no. 28, June 2016. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.22395/rium. v15n28a2
  • Y. Ma, L. Liu, K. Lu, B. Jin, and X. Liu, "A graph derivation based approach for measuring and comparing structural semantics of ontologies," IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., vol. 26, no. 5, May 2014. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2013.120
  • G. Glavaš, M. Franco, S. P. Ponzetto, and P. Rosso, "A resource-light method for cross-lingual semantic textual similarity," Knowledge-Based Syst., vol. 143, March 1 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2017.11.041
  • I. Traverso, "Exploiting semantics from ontologies to enhance accuracy of similarity measures," in Proceedings of the 12th European Semantic Web Conference on The Semantic Web. Latest Advances and New Domains, 2015, pp. 795–805.
  • B. Hajian and T. White, "Measuring semantic similarity using a multi-tree model," in CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2010, pp. 7–14.
  • H. Sun and et al, "Topic model based knowledge graph for entity similarity measuring," in 2018 IEEE 15th International Conference on e-Business Engineering (ICEBE), Xi'an, China, 2018, pp. 94–101.
  • L. Miao, Y. Zhou, W. Cheng, and J. Guo, "Using semantic similarity model to improve ogc web services matching accuracy," in 2015 Fourth International Conference on Agro-Geoinformatics (Agro-geoinformatics), Istanbul, Turkey, 2015, pp. 217–220.