File uploads: We have fixed an issue which caused file uploads to fail. We apologise for the inconvenience it may have caused.

Published September 5, 2020 | Version v1
Journal article Open

ANALYSIS OF THE GUT CONTENTS OF INDIAN MAJOR CARP ROHU (LABEO ROHITA) FROM MEERANPUR LAKE OF DISTRICT SULTANPUR, UTTAR PRADESH, INDIA

  • 1. Department of Zoology, Ganpat Sahai Post Graduate College, Sultanpur 228001, Uttar Pradesh, India

Description

The present study was carried out to analyze the gut contents of Indian major carp Rohu (Labeo rohita) from Meeranpur Lake of district Sultanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India. Monthly samples were collected from the lake for the analysis of gut contents during August 2018 to July 2019.The analysis of gut contents of Indian major carp, L. rohita provides information on quality and quantity of food components and feeding habit of fish. The results so obtained were used to compute percentage volume of food items in the gut (% Vi), percentage of occurrence of guts having particular food items (% Oi), Index of preponderance and the grading of food items of gut contents of L. rohita. Under natural condition the fingerling stage of L. rohita prefers zooplankton with phytoplankton as subsidiary food. The fingerling stage of the fish exhibited a strong positive selection for all zooplanktonic organisms and smaller phytoplankton. The adult stage of L. rohita show a strong negative selection for all zooplanktonic organisms and positive selection for most phytoplanktonic organisms and submerged macro vegetation. The present study agreed that the Indian major carp L. rohita exhibits different feeding strategy during its growth from fingerling to adult.

Files

7. IJZAB ID No. 535.pdf

Files (797.5 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:d20bff488c0f3710f9c7fce32d4a4301
797.5 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • Alam, M., Sharma, S., & Pathak, J. (2011). Food Preferences of Labeo rohita (Hamilton) in River Ramganga, Uttar Pradesh, India. International Journal of Fisheries and Aquaculture Sciences, 1(2), 99-105.
  • Baker, R., Buckland, A., & Sheaves, M. (2014). Fish gut content analysis: robust measures of diet composition. Fish and Fisheries, 15(1), 170-177.
  • Braga, R. R., Bornatowski, H., & Vitule, J. R. S. (2012). Feeding ecology of fishes: an overview of worldwide publications. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 22(4), 915-929.
  • Cortés, E. (1997). A critical review of methods of studying fish feeding based on analysis of stomach contents: application to elasmobranch fishes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 54(3), 726-738.
  • Ekpo, I. E., Essien-Ibok, M. A., & Nkwoji, J. N. (2014). Food and feeding habits and condition factor of fish species in Qua Iboe River estuary, Akwa Ibom State, southeastern Nigeria. International Journal of Fisheries and Aquacuture. Studies, 2(2), 38-46.
  • Guy, C. S., & Brown, M. L. (2007). Analysis and interpretation of freshwater fisheries data: American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland, USA, 473-514.
  • Hansson, S. (1998). Methods of studying fish feeding: a comment. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 55(12), 2706-2707.
  • Hynes, H. (1950). The food of fresh-water sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus and Pygosteus pungitius), with a review of methods used in studies of the food of fishes. The Journal of Animal Ecology, 36-58.
  • Hyslop, E. (1980). Stomach contents analysis a review of methods and their application. Journal of Fish Biology, 17(4), 411-429.
  • Karim, M., & Hossain, A. (1972). Studies on the biology of Mastacembelus pancalus (Ham.) in artificial ponds. Part II. Sexual maturity and fecundity. Bangladesh Journal of Biology and Agricultural Sciences, 1, 15-18.
  • Kido, M. H. (1996). Morphological variation in feeding traits of native Hawaiian stream fishes. Journal of Pacific Science, 50(2),184-193.
  • Liao, H., Pierce, C. L., & Larscheid, J. G. (2001). Empirical assessment of indices of prey importance in the diets of predacious fish. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 130(4), 583-591.
  • Manko, P. (2016). Stomach content analysis in freshwater fish feeding ecology. University of Prešov, 1-116.
  • Marshall, S., & Elliott, M. (1997). A comparison ofunivariate and multivariate numerical and graphical techniques for determining inter‐and intraspecific feeding relationships in estuarine fish. Journal of Fish Biology, 51(3), 526-545.
  • Mohan, M., & Sankaran, T. (1988). Two new indices for stomach content analysis of fishes. Journal of Fish Biology, 33(2), 289-292.
  • Nansimole, A., Sruthi, S., Devi, T., Lekshmi, S., Balasubramaniam, N., & Radhakrishnan, T. (2014). Studies on morphometry, feeding biology and sex ratio of Saurida undosquamis (Richardson, 1848) (Fam: Synodontidae) from Neendakara area, Kollam, South West coast of India. Indian Journal of Scientific Research, 5(2), 51-58.
  • Natarajan, A., & Jhingran, A. (1961). Index of preponderance a method of grading the food elements in the stomach analysis of fishes. Indian Journal of Fisheries, 8(1), 54-59.
  • Panicker, A. C. (2000). Ecological impact of tilapia, Oreochromis mossambica Peters on the indigenous fish species in two reservoirs of Kerala. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Kerala.
  • Pillay, T. V. R. (1953). Studies on the food, feeding habits and alimentary tract of the grey mullet, Mugil tade Forskal: Indian National Science Academy. 19, 777-827.
  • Rahman, M. M., Hossain, M. Y., Jo, Q., Kim, S.-K., Ohtomi, J., & Meyer, C. (2009). Ontogenetic shift in dietary preference and low dietary overlap in rohu (Labeo rohita) and common carp (Cyprinus carpio) in semi-intensive polyculture ponds. Ichthyological Research, 56(1), 28.
  • Sunder, S., Kumar, K., & Raina, H. (1984). Food and feeding habits and length-weight relationship of Cyprinus carpio specularis Linnaeus of Dal Lake, Kashmir. Indian Journal of Fisheries, 31(1), 90-99.

Subjects

Zoology
10.5281/zenodo.4015976