Published December 27, 2019 | Version Final
Journal article Open

Gender assignment is rule-governed: A comparative analysis of Punjabi and English

Creators

  • 1. The University of Lahore
  • 2. University of the Punjab

Description

Gender is a complicated term in linguistics and the debatable issue is that gender allocation system is rule governed or a random activity. Corbett (2006) established that gender assignment is based on certain criteria, which vary in different languages. According to Corbett (2006), two main criteria are found universally i.e. semantic and formal. The basic aim of this study is to investigate the gender allocation to noun is rule governed or random in English and Punjabi languages. English has a natural gender system while Punjabi has a grammatical gender system. The findings show that gender allocation to noun is rule-governed in English language; whereas, it is somehow random in Punjabi language. In English language, semantic criterion is used to assign gender while formal criterion is also used to allocate gender to some nouns while in Punjabi both semantic and formal criteria are used side by side to allocate gender to noun.

Notes

This study is self-funded.

Files

Khoj-83- my article.pdf

Files (1.8 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:65d62ec4e5b57284395f197f346b7f0a
1.8 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Identifiers

ISSN
1992-6545

References

  • Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. New York: Holt.
  • Corbett, G. (1991). Gender, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
  • Corbett, G. G. (2006). Gender, grammatical. The Encyclopedia of language and linguistics.2nd Edition. Oxford: Elsevier, 749-756.
  • Corbett, G. G., & Fraser, N. M. (2000). Gender assignment: a typology and a model (pp. 293-325). Systems of nominal classification, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • Corbett, G.G., 2011. Systems of gender assignment. In: Dryer, M., Haspelmath, M. (Eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Max Planck Digital Library, Munich.
  • David, A., (2014). Descriptive grammar of Pashto and its dialects. Walter de ruyter, 1
  • Doleschal, U. (2000). Gender assignment revisited. TRENDS IN LINGUISTICS STUDIES AND MONOGRAPHS, 124, 117-166.
  • Kaltsa, M., Tsimpli, I. M., &Argyri, F. (2019).The development of gender assignment and agreement in English-Greek and German-Greek bilingual children. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 9(2), 253- 288.
  • Khan, Q. (2017).Understanding Gender in Pak-Afghan Pashtun Society: A Sociolinguistic Analysis of Folk Stories. NUML Journal of Critical Inquiry, 15(1), 108-XII.
  • Kramer, R. (2014). Gender in Amharic: A morphosyntactic approach to natural and grammatical gender. Language Sciences, 43, 102-115.
  • Kupisch, T., Akpınar, D., &Stöhr, A. (2013).Gender assignment and gender agreement in adult bilinguals and second language learners of French. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 3(2), 150-179.
  • Möhring, A. (2001). The acquisition of French by German pre-school children: An empirical investigation of gender assignment and gender agreement. Eurosla Yearbook, 1(1), 171-193.
  • Montanari, E. (2014). Grammatical gender in the discourse of multilingual children's acquisition of German.
  • Schwichtenberg, B., & Schiller, N. O. (2004).Semantic gender assignment regularities in German. Brain and language, 90(1-3), 326-337.
  • Vanhove, M., Stolz, T., Urdze, A., &Otsuka, H. (2012). Morphologies in contact (StudiaTypologica 10): Berlin: AkademieVerlag. doi. 79
  • Zubin, D. A., &Kopcke, K. M. (1984). Affect classification in the German gender system. Lingua, 63(1), 41-96.