Info: Zenodo’s user support line is staffed on regular business days between Dec 23 and Jan 5. Response times may be slightly longer than normal.

Published August 14, 2020 | Version v1
Dataset Open

Loss of ecologically important genetic variation in late generation hybrids reveals links between adaptation and speciation

  • 1. University of Queensland
  • 2. Uppsala University
  • 3. Massey University

Description

Adaptation to contrasting environments occurs when advantageous alleles accumulate in each population, but it remains largely unknown whether these same advantageous alleles create genetic incompatibilities that can cause intrinsic reproductive isolation leading to speciation. Identifying alleles that underlie both adaptation and reproductive isolation is further complicated by factors such as dominance and genetic interactions among loci, which can affect both processes differently and obscure potential links between adaptation and speciation. Here, we use a combination of field and glasshouse experiments to explore the connection between adaptation and speciation while accounting for dominance and genetic interactions. We created a hybrid population with equal contributions from four contrasting ecotypes of Senecio lautus (Asteraceae), which produced hybrid genomes both before (F1 hybrid generation) and after (F4 hybrid generation) recombination among the parental ecotypes. In the glasshouse, plants in the second generation (F2 hybrid generation) showed reduced fitness as a loss of fertility, but fertility was recovered in subsequent generations suggesting that genetic variation underlying fertility reduction was lost in subsequent generations. To quantify the effects of losing genetic variation at the F2 generation on the fitness of later generation hybrids, we used a reciprocal transplant to test for fitness differences between parental ecotypes, and F1 and F4 hybrids in all four parental habitats. Compared to the parental ecotypes and F1 hybrids, variance in F4 hybrid fitness was lower, and lowest in habitats that showed stronger native-ecotype advantage, suggesting that stronger natural selection for the native ecotype reduced fitness variation in the F4 hybrids. Fitness trade-offs that were present in the parental ecotypes and F1 hybrids were absent in the F4 hybrid. Together, these results suggest that the genetic variation lost after the F2 generation was likely associated with both adaptation and intrinsic reproductive isolation among populations adapted to contrasting environments.

Notes

Funding provided by: Australian Research Council
Crossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000923
Award Number: DP0986172

Files

Readme.txt

Files (2.1 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:dd6d02e7aa36a602a7170ef3618e3ce1
1.0 kB Preview Download
md5:4d389ae9daa07e0fd86861f31c8d2042
329.5 kB Preview Download
md5:71f87ec420ffb3cd6cdfe27b19580dbb
1.8 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Related works

Is supplemented by
10.5061/dryad.d9f36 (DOI)
10.5061/dryad.ks67ft7 (DOI)