Legal bases status quo children who were unafficiently carried out of Ukraine
Description
The article is devoted to analysis of international law and norms of the operating civil legislation of Ukraine, which regulates the order of removal of a child from the country of permanent residence. The content of the principle of the best interests of a child identified a number of issues, which in practice can lead to the adoption of unreasonable decisions to return a child from abroad.
Separately stated that the child should grow up in conditions of care and responsible parenting in an atmosphere of love, moral and material security; juvenile children, except when there are exceptional circumstances, should not part with their parents.
The article analyzes the issues that arise, when the court is considering the cases of "the return of the children", when some courts mistakenly determine the jurisdiction of the following categories of cases, not paying attention to the fact that the court may consider the case both at the location of the defendant and the child, and at the location of the Ministry or its territorial bodies (alternative jurisdiction).
The attention is paid to the fact that an important issue in the consideration of this category of cases about the return of a child is too long, in accordance with international law. These things are subject to quick consideration, in practice, there is a violation of the reasonable time of proceedings.
Ukraine became party to the Convention on the civil aspects of international child abduction, has made a commitment to take all necessary measures to join the international cooperation mechanism that allows to solve questions of the organization in an orderly and rapid return of illegally removed or retained children, who have suffered from the consequences of wrongful conduct of one of parents or other family members, actions, which violated the rights of parents regarding child care, because the immediate return of the child allows to protect his\her rights and to prevent the infliction of moral harm and suffering
Files
Legal bases status quo children who were unafficiently carried out of Ukraine.pdf
Files
(360.3 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:8d2b36d879e5a9fb00346445e8bd9479
|
360.3 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- Konvencіia pro civіlno-pravovі aspekti mіzhnarodnogo vikradennia dіtei. 25.10.1980 (1980). Available at: http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_188
- Stefanchuk, M. O. (2017). Zakhyst subiektyvnykh tsyvilnykh prav ditei v umovakh zbroinykh konfliktiv cherez pryzmu adaptatsii zakonodavstva Ukrainy do standartiv YeS (problemy priorytetiv ta terminolohii). Naukovyi visnyk UzhNU. Seriia «Pravo», 1 (45), 101–105.
- Maksymovych, L. B. (2005). O prave rebenka virazhat svoe mnenye. Problemi hrazhdanskoho, semeinoho y zhylyshchnoho zakonodatelstva. Moscow: Horodets, 58–70.
- Tripulskyi, H. Ya. (2007). Protsesualni osoblyvosti rozghliadu sporiv, yaki zviazani z vynyknenniam, zdiisnenniam ta zminoiu osobystykh nemainovykh pravovidnosyn mizh batkamy ta ditmy. Odessa, 227.
- Valuieva, N. O., Kravchuk, M. O., Poliakova, K. A. (2015). Pytannia vrakhuvannia dumky dytyny pid chas vyrishennia pytan, shcho stosuiutsia yii zhyttia. Visnyk AMSU. Seriia:"Pravo", 1 (14), 91–94.
- Krasytska, L. V. (2011). Pravo dytyny vilno vyslovliuvaty vlasni pohliady ta dumky z usikh pytan, shcho yii stosuiutsia. Universytetski naukovi zapysky, 4, 80–86.
- Krestovska, N. M. (2014). Prava dytyny pid chas zbroinoho konfliktu: suchasni ukrainski realii. Derzhavnyi suverenitet, natsionalna bezpeka i svitovyi pravoporiadok v istoryko-pravovomu vymiri. Berehove, 150–157.
- Fakultatyvnyi protokol do Konventsii pro prava dytyny shchodo uchasti ditei u zbroinykh konfliktakh: Ratyfikovano iz zaiavoiu Zakonom No. 1845-IV vid 23.06.2004 (2004). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, 38, 476.
- Yavor, O. A. (2004). Do problemy osobystykh nemainovykh prav dytyny. Visnyk Khmelnytskoho instytutu rehionalnoho upravlinnia ta prava, 4, 68–74.
- Pohribnyi, S. O. (2009). Mekhanizm ta pryntsypy rehuliuvannia dohovirnykh vidnosyn u tsyvilnomu pravi Ukrainy. Kyiv, 412.
- Zavhorodnii, V. A., Pshenychna, H. Ye. (2013). Konstytutsiinyi oboviazok batkiv utrymuvaty ditei do yikh povnolittia: stan naukovykh doslidzhen. Pravo i suspilstvo, 6, 20–23.
- Kohm, L. M. (2008). Tracing the Foundations of the Best Interest of the Child Standard in American Jurisprudence. Journal of Law and Family Studies, 10 (2), 40. doi: http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1957143
- Volynka, K. H. (2000). Zabezpechennia prav i svobod osoby v Ukraini: teoretychni i praktychni aspekty. Pravo Ukrainy, 11, 30–33.
- Deklaratsiia prav dytyny Pryiniata rezoliutsiieiu 1386 (XIV) Heneralnoi Asamblei OON. 20.11.1959 (1959). Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_384#Text
- Konventsiia OON pro prava dytyny. 20.11.1989 (1998). Available at: http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_021/print
- Yevtushenko, O. (2015). Spirni pytannia vyvezennia abo povernennia ditei maiut vyrishuvatysia lyshe u pravovomu poli. Yurydychna hazeta, 10-11 (456-457). Available at: https://yur-gazeta.com/interview/spirni-pitannya-vivezennya-abo-povernennya-ditey-mayut-virishuvatisya-lishe-u-pravovomu-poli.html
- Mizhnarodna konventsiia pro zakhyst usikh osib vid nasylnytskykh znyknen. Shchodo pryiednannia do Konventsii iz zaiavamy dyv: Zakon No. 525-VIII. 17.06.2015. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_l54#Text
- Pro okhoronu dytynstva (2001). Zakon Ukrainy No. 2402-III. 26.04.2001. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy (VVR), 30, 142. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2402-14#Text
- Pavlenko, Yu. (2013). Z bezpravnoho ne vyroste vilnyi. Narodnii Deputat, 93. Available at: http://nardep-journal.com/article/2013/93/Uriy-Pavlenko-Z-BEZPRAVNOGO-NE-VIROSTE-VILNIY
- Zaichuk, O. V. et. al.; Zaichuk, O. V., Onishchenko, N. M. (Eds.) (2008). Teoriia derzhavy i prava. Akademichnyi kurs. Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter, 688.
- Konventsiia pro likvidatsiiu vsikh form dyskryminatsii shchodo zhinok 1979 r. (2014). Osnovni mizhnarodni dohovory z prav liudyny. New York, Zheneva: Orhanizatsiia Obiednanykh Natsii, 107–114. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_207#Text
- Kabanov, V. L. (2019). Realizaciia principa nailuchshego obespecheniia interesov rebenka v mezhdunarodnom prave. Moscow, 407.
- Zastosuvannia konventsii pro tsyvilno-pravovi aspekty mizhnarodnoho vykradennia ditei. Available at: https://minjust.gov.ua/m/str_28838
- Informatsiinyi lyst. Vyshchyi spetsializovanyi sud Ukrainy z rozghliadu tsyvilnykh i kryminalnykh sprav. Pro praktyku rozghliadu sudamy tsyvilnykh sprav iz zastosuvanniam Konventsii pro tsyvilno-pravovi aspekty mizhnarodnoho vykradennia ditei 25.10.1980 (Haazka konventsiia). Available at: https://zib.com.ua/ua/113728-vssu_uzagalniv_praktiku_schodo_konvencii_pro_vikradennya_dit.html
- Kabanov, V. L. (2016). Realizaciia obschepriznannogo mezhdunarodnopravovogo principa, obespechivaiuschego nailuchshie interesy rebenka: universalnye i regionalnye aspekty. Moscow: RUDN, 227.