Published June 30, 2020 | Version v1
Journal article Open

CHOOSING THE RATIONAL MANAGEMENT OF HIGH­RISE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS

Creators

  • 1. State Higher Educational Institution "Prydniprovska State Academy of Civil Engineering and Architecture"
  • 2. niprovsky State Agrarian and Economic University

Description

The approach to the choice of rational management of high-rise building construction, which ensures the effective use of resources, was developed. This approach is aimed at ensuring cost-effectiveness, energy-saving, quality, safety, and environmental friendliness of high-rise buildings.

It was proposed to solve such tasks based on the search for rational decisions that correspond most to desirable (assigned) technical and economic characteristics (indicators), based on the application of statistical modeling of projects as manageable processes. At the same time, it is advisable to take into consideration the influence of determining organizational-technological, technical, and managerial factors. To assess decisions regarding these factors, it is necessary to find a rational value of management efficiency criterion. From the customer’s (investor’s) position, it is advisable to consider the minimum cost of high-rise building construction.

It was proposed to consider the impact of the factors of quality, safety, energy efficiency, environmental friendliness, optimal maintenance of a high-rise building. The sufficiency and essence of the impact of these factors on making rational decisions in the management of high-rise building construction projects were substantiated by the results of the expert questioning.

Mathematical models, based on the consideration of the systemic influence of determining factors, were obtained. These models provide an opportunity to assess numerically the level of achievement of the assigned results, in particular, by the criterion of high-rise building construction, at various stages of project management.

The obtained results are relevant because they make it possible to reach the rational values of the desired indicators under specific conditions of execution of construction and mounting works within specified resource restrictions. By operating predictive estimates of the expected results, investors have the opportunity to adjust their goals and choose the most rational variant of the investment-construction project.

Files

Choosing the rational management of high­rise building construction projects.pdf

Files (453.2 kB)

Additional details

References

  • Goncharenko, D. F., Karpenko, Yu. V., Meersdorf, E. I. (2013). Vozvedenie mnogoetazhnyh karkasno-monolitnyh zdaniy. Kyiv: A+S, 128.
  • Beedle, L. S., Ali, M. M., Armstrong, P. J. (2007). The skyscraper and the city: design, technology, and innovation. Lewiston: Edwin Mellen Press.
  • Tamboli, A. R. (2014). Tall and supertall buildings: planning and design. McGraw-Hill.
  • Kravchunovska, T. S., Bronevytskyi, S. P., Kovalov, V. V., Danylova, T. V., Tkach, T. V. (2019). Planuvannia rozmishchennia i orhanizatsiya budivnytstva ta rekonstruktsiyi obiektiv dostupnoho zhytla z urakhuvanniam mistoformuiuchykh osoblyvostei terytoriy velykykh mist. Dnipro: Litohraf, 228.
  • Maklakova, T. G. (2008). Vysotnye zdaniya. Gradostroitel'nye i arhitekturno-konstruktivnye problemy proektirovaniya. Moscow: ASV, 160.
  • Yeang, K. (Ed.) (2011). Green design: from theory to practice. London: Black Dog, 144.
  • Mlodetskiy, V. R., Tyan, R. B., Popova, V. V., Martysh, A. A. (2013). Organizatsionno-tehnologicheskaya i ekonomicheskaya nadezhnost' v stroitel'stve. Dnepropetrovsk: Nauka i obrazovanie, 194.
  • Walker, A. (2015). Project management in construction. New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell, 352.
  • Levy, S. M. (2012). Project management in construction. New York: McGraw-Hill, 496.
  • Zaiats, Y. I., Kravchunovska, T. S., Kovalov, V. V., Kirnos, O. V. (2018). Risk level assessment while organizational-managerial decision making in the condition of dynamic external environment. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, 2, 123–129. doi: https://doi.org/10.29202/nvngu/2018-2/24
  • Teslia, I., Yehorchenkov, O., Khlevna, I., Khlevnyi, A. (2018). Development of the concept and method of building of specified project management methodologies. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5 (3 (95)), 6–16. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2018.142707
  • Zaiats, Ye. I., Mlodetskyi, V. R., Tkach, T. V., Martysh, O. O. (2019). Metody zabezpechennia upravlinskoi realizovanosti kalendarnykh planiv zvedennia obiektiv budivnytstva. Dnipro: Aktsent-PP, 148.
  • Zaiats, Ye. I. (2015). Zvedennia vysotnykh bahatofunktsionalnykh kompleksiv: orhanizatsiyno-tekhnolohichni aspekty. Dnipropetrovsk: PDABA, 208.
  • Chernyshev, D. O. (2017). Metodolohiya, analitychnyi instrumentariy ta praktyka orhanizatsiyi biosferosumisnoho budivnytstva. Kyiv: KNUBA, 294.
  • Sizova, N., Starkova, O., Solodovnik, G., Dolgova, N. (2019). Development of a computer model for evaluating the alternative options of an investment and construction project under conditions of uncertainty and risk. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6 (3 (102)), 66–76. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2019.184376
  • Lytvynenko, O. V. (2015). Risk assessment and organizational-technological reliability of construction projects. Shliakhy pidvyshchennia efektyvnosti budivnytstva v umovakh formuvannia rynkovykh vidnosyn, 33, 184–190.
  • Zavadskas, E., Antucheviciene, J., Vilutiene, T., Adeli, H. (2017). Sustainable Decision-Making in Civil Engineering, Construction and Building Technology. Sustainability, 10 (2), 14. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010014
  • Shao, Q.-G., Liou, J., Weng, S.-S., Chuang, Y.-C. (2018). Improving the Green Building Evaluation System in China Based on the DANP Method. Sustainability, 10 (4), 1173. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041173
  • Kovalov, V. V., Kirnos, O. V. (2018). Modern approaches to the preliminary assessment of investment-building projects with the stochasticity of processes. New Technologies in Construction, 34, 39–42.
  • Goncharenko, D. F., Veveler, H., Aleynikova, A. I. (2015). Ekspluatatsiya, remont i vosstanovlenie truboprovodov vodosnabzheniya. Kharkiv: Raritety Ukrainy, 280.
  • Kryuchkovskiy, V. V., Petrov, E. G., Sokolova, N. A., Hodakov, V. E. (2011). Introspektivniy analiz. Metody i sredstva ekspertnogo otsenivaniya. Kherson: Grin' D.S., 168.
  • Orlov, A. I. (2011). Organizatsionno-ekonomicheskoe modelirovanie. Ch. 2: Ekspertnye otsenki. Moscow: Izd-vo MGTU im. N.E. Baumana, 486.
  • Ershova, N. M., Skripnik, V. P. (2011). Ekonomiko-matematicheskie metody i modeli prinyatiya resheniy v usloviyah opredelennosti, neopredelennosti i riska. Dnepropetrovsk: PGASA, 350.
  • Kovalov, V. V., Danylova, T. V., Yepifantseva, S. V. (2018). Systemization of organizational and technological and other factors affecting the cost of building objects, with the requirement for their energy efficiency and environmentality. Bulletin of Prydniprovs'ka State Academy of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 6, 57–64. doi: https://doi.org/10.30838/j.bpsacea.2312.261218.57.448
  • Kovalov, V. V., Kravchunovska, T. S., Danylova, T. V., Yepifantseva, S. V. (2019). Formuvannia vymoh do obiektiv budivnytstva protiahom yikh povnoho zhyttievoho tsyklu. Shliakhy pidvyshchennia efektyvnosti budivnytstva v umovakh formuvannia rynkovykh vidnosyn, 39 (1), 179–186.
  • Kobeleva, S. (2013). The scenarios of housing in view of the influence of the environmental factors. Stroitel'stvo i rekonstruktsiya, 3 (47), 33–38.
  • Lapteva, A. Y., Chervona, A. O. (2015). Reliability of the construction company and its evaluation (example of public company «Makrocap Development Ukraine»). Scientific Bulletin of Civil Engineering, 1, 248–251.
  • Savytskyi, M., Benderskyi, Y., Babenko, M. (2014). Assessment of environmental parameters of object construction. Academic Journal. Industrial Machine Building, Civil Engineering, 1 (3 (42)), 144–149. Available at: http://znp.nupp.edu.ua/files/archive/ua/2014/42_1/144-149.pdf