Preprint Open Access

Recommendations for the conduct of systematic reviews in toxicology and environmental health research (COSTER)

Whaley, Paul; Aiassa, Elisa; Beausoleil, Claire; Beronius, Anna; Bilotta, Gary; Boobis, Alan; de Vries, Rob; Hanberg, Annika; Hoffmann, Sebastian; Hunt, Neil; Kwiatkowski, Carol; Lam, Juleen; Lipworth, Steven; Martin, Olwenn; Randall, Nicola; Rhomberg, Lorenz; Rooney, Andrew A.; Schünemann, Holger J.; Wikoff, Daniele; Wolffe, Taylor; Halsall, Crispin

Background: There are several standards that offer explicit guidance on good practice in systematic reviews (SRs) for the medical sciences; however, no similarly comprehensive set of recommendations has been published for SRs that focus on human health risks posed by exposure to environmental challenges, chemical or otherwise.

Objectives: To develop an expert, cross-sector consensus view on a key set of recommended practices for the planning and conduct of SRs in the environmental health sciences.

Methods: A draft set of recommendations was derived from two existing standards for SRs in biomedicine and developed in a consensus process, which engaged international participation from government, industry, non-government organisations, and academia. The consensus process consisted of a workshop, follow-up webinars, email discussion and bilateral phone calls.

Results: The Conduct of Systematic Reviews in Toxicology and Environmental Health Research (COSTER) recommendations cover 70 SR practices across eight performance domains. Detailed explanations for specific recommendations are made for those identified by the authors as either being novel to SR in general, specific to the environmental health SR context, or potentially controversial to environmental health SR stakeholders.

Discussion: COSTER provides a set of recommendations that should facilitate the production of credible, high-value SRs of environmental health evidence, and advance discussion of a number of controversial aspects of conduct of EH SRs. Key recommendations include the management of conflicts of interest, handling of grey literature, and protocol registration and publication. A process for advancing from COSTER’s recommendations to developing a formal standard for EH SRs is also indicated.

Files (23.7 MB)
Name Size
Author DOIs ICMJE Format.zip
md5:a0f53f0dd67de50f1d02fb0537757540
21.0 MB Download
COSTER - Accepted Proof.pdf
md5:78d11f5721d0c13459ee96f666eb6bf3
654.7 kB Download
SUPP 01 - SR in CRA 2016 Workshop Agenda.pdf
md5:8ff894d80ec1eb2d5d320443e9062fa0
1.1 MB Download
SUPP 02 - Discussion Draft of MECIR-style standard for CRA.pdf
md5:cbac0cfd08c53cea3f1c9de7419ce4a2
678.1 kB Download
SUPP 03 - ECoSys-CRA - Draft Requirements.pdf
md5:05e1f2c68bae8e23895be8da12bc40b4
274.5 kB Download
1,004
547
views
downloads
All versions This version
Views 1,004172
Downloads 54736
Data volume 502.1 MB84.8 MB
Unique views 849144
Unique downloads 45627

Share

Cite as