Info: Zenodo’s user support line is staffed on regular business days between Dec 23 and Jan 5. Response times may be slightly longer than normal.

Published May 18, 2020 | Version v1
Journal article Open

DEVELOPMENT OF PRIORITY MEASURES (SOLUTIONS) FOR THE ENVIRONMENTALLY SAFE MANAGEMENT OF MUNICIPAL WASTE AT THE COMMUNITY LEVEL

Creators

  • 1. Ukrainian Research Institute of Environmental Problems

Description

Environmentally safe waste management remains one of the priority areas of civil society. Despite the introduction of a number of regulations, such as Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19.11.2008, the issue of effective management in the field of waste management not resolved. Therefore, the process of solid waste management at the level of territorial communities is considered as the object of research. Among the main shortcomings of this process is the lack of effective mechanisms and algorithms for systems to support informed decisions on waste management in their specific area.

The article proposes and discloses a scientific and methodological approach to integrated expert and analytical evaluation of the processes of household waste management and substantiates the feasibility of environmental safety management measures. In the course of the research the decomposition of the household waste management process was carried out. This allows to identify the sources and characteristics of hazard detection, among which the largest contribution is made by waste incineration plants without energy (47.41 %) and the conditions of waste accumulation with increasing hazard (54.95 %). Using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) allows to take into account individual and collective judgments of experts, which not only improves the quality of research but also allows to determine the priority of environmental safety management measures. According to the calculations, the most important (44.01 % of the total contribution) is the measure to introduce the best available technologies for solid waste management. Obtaining such results is possible due to the fact that the method of analysis of hierarchies allows to determine the step-by-step transitivity and consistency of expert assessments.

Compared to similar methods the proposed method, as simple and straightforward, is quite easy to use. This increases the effectiveness of transparent decision-making at the grassroots level through the involvement of highly qualified environmental and public administration professionals.

Files

DEVELOPMENT OF PRIORITY MEASURES (SOLUTIONS) FOR THE ENVIRONMENTALLY SAFE MANAGEMENT OF MUNICIPAL WASTE AT THE COMMUNITY LEVEL.pdf

Files (366.2 kB)

Additional details

References

  • Petruk, V. H., Vasylkivskyi, I. V., Ishchenko, V. A., Petruk, R. V. (2013). Upravlinnia ta povodzhennia z vidkhodamy. Chastyna 3. Polihony tverdykh pobutovykh vidkhodiv. Vinnytsia – VNTU, 139.
  • Shoste natsionalne povidomlennia Ukrainy z pytan zminy klimatu (2014). Ministerstvo ekolohii ta pryrodnykh resursiv Ukrainy, Derzhavna sluzhba Ukrainy z nadzvychainykh sytuatsii, Natsionalna akademiia nauk Ukrainy, Ukrainskyi hidrometeorolohichnyi instytut. Kyiv, 323.
  • Pidsumkovyi zvit. Tverdi pobutovi vidkhody v Ukraini: potentsial rozvytku stsenarii rozvytku haluzi povodzhennia z tverdymy pobutovymy vidkhodamy (2015). Mizhnarodna finansova korporatsiia. Kyiv, 114.
  • Honcharenko, I., Anishchenko, L., Pisnia, L. (2020). Expert-analytical estimation of environmental safety of solid household waste handling processes. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1 (10 (103)), 63–76. doi: http://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2020.197007
  • Dorofeiuk, A. A., Goldovskaia, M. D., Kiseleva, N. E., Pokrovskaia, I. V., Spiro, A. G., Cherniavskii, A. L. (2016). Protsedury kollektivnoi mnogovariantnoi ekspertizy v zadachakh analiza i sovershenstvovaniia sotsialno-ekonomicheskikh sistem. Informatsionnye tekhnologii i vychislitelnye sistemy, 4, 53–68.
  • Vysotskaia, E. V. (2014). Metod opredeleniia znachimosti mnenii ekspertov pri formirovanii ekspertnoi gruppy dlia priniatiia meditsinskikh reshenii. Sistemi obrobki іnformatsіi, 2, 216–221. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/soi_2014_2_46
  • Petrichenko, G. S. (2015). Metodika otsenki kompetentnosti ekspertov. Nauchnii zhurnal KubGAU, 109 (5). Available at: http://ej.kubagro.ru/2015/05/pdf/04.pdf
  • Postnikov, V. M. (2012). Analiz podkhodov k formirovaniiu sostava ekspertnoi gruppy, orientirovannoi na podgotovku i priniatie reshenii. Mashinostroenie i kompiuternye tekhnologi, 12 (5). doi: http://doi.org/10.7463/0512.0360720
  • Mediouni, A., Cheikhrouhou, N. (2019). Expert Selection for Humanitarian Projects Development: A Group Decision Making approach with Incomplete Information Relations. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 52 (13), 1943–1948. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.11.487
  • Selvarajah, K., Zadeh, P. M., Kargar, M., Kobti, Z. (2019). Identifying a Team of Experts in Social Networks using a Cultural Algorithm. Procedia Computer Science, 151, 477–484. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.04.065
  • Melnik, P. B. (2017). Metodika formirovaniia ekspertnykh pulov i grupp dlia provedeniia ekspertno-analiticheskikh issledovanii. Innovatika i Ekspertiza, 1 (19), 39–54.
  • Mitroshin, P. A. (2016). Hierarchy analysis method for selection of expert groups in competence-based model of education. Components of scientific and technological progress, 4 (30), 32–37.
  • Stenin, A. A., Stenin, S. A., Gubskii, A. N. (2012). Formirovanie ekspertnykh grupp na osnove metodov vzaimnoi kompetentsii i diagramm Veicha. Problemy informatsionnykh tekhnologii, 2 (12), 6–9.
  • Bogush, A. R. (2015). Metodologiia formirovaniia ekspertnykh grupp. Biomeditsinskaia inzheneriia i elektronika, 3 (10). Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/metodologiya-formirovaniya-ekspertnyh-grupp
  • Xue, M., Fu, C., Yang, S.-L. (2020). Group consensus reaching based on a combination of expert weight and expert reliability. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 369, 124902. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2019.124902
  • Mitroshin, P. A. (2016). Problemy vybora ekspertnykh grupp i primeneniia metoda analiza ierarkhii dlia ranzhirovaniia distsiplin po vazhnosti v ramkakh opredelennykh kompetentsii. Perspektivy nauki, 12 (87), 119–126. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=27442656
  • Kalbar, P. P., Karmakar, S., Asolekar, S. R. (2013). The influence of expert opinions on the selection of wastewater treatment alternatives: A group decision-making approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 128, 844–851. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.06.034
  • Burianina, O. A., Abramkina, S. R. (2019). Upravlencheskie resheniia mestnykh organov vlasti: kriterii vybora effektivnykh metodov upravleniia. Sotsium i vlast, 1 (75), 91–101. Avaqilable at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/upravlencheskie-resheniya-mestnyh-organov-vlasti-kriterii-vybora-effektivnyh-metodov-upravleniya
  • Sabadosh, L. Iu., Kosenko, N. V., Gakhova, M. A. (2012). Sistema podderzhki priniatiia reshenii po formirovaniiu proektnoi komandy. Nauchnye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia: Ekonomika. Informatika, 19-1 (138), 185–189. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sistema-podderzhki-prinyatiya-resheniy-po-formirovaniyu-proektnoy-komandy
  • Podinovskii, V. V., Podinovskaia, O. V. (2011). O nekorrektnosti metoda analiza ierarkhii. Problemy upravleniia, 1, 8–13.
  • Podinovskii, V. V., Podinovskaia, O. V. (2012). Esche raz o nekorrektnosti metoda analiza ierarkhii. Problemy upravleniia, 4, 75–78.
  • Shageev, D. A. (2019). Upravlenie sotsialno-ekonomicheskimi sistemami. Vestnik IUUrGU. Seriia «Ekonomika i menedzhment», 13 (2), 145–164.
  • Dorofeiuk, A. A., Pokrovskaia, I. V., Cherniavskii, A. L. (2004). Ekspertnye metody analiza i sovershenstvovaniia sistem upravleniia. Avtomatika i telemekhanika, 10, 172–188.
  • Burianina, O. A., Abramkina, S. R. (2019). Upravlencheskie resheniia mestnykh organov vlasti: kriterii vybora effektivnykh metodov upravleniia. Sotsium i vlast, 1 (75), 91–101.
  • Ogurtsov, A. N., Staroverova, N. A. (2013). Algoritm povysheniia soglasovannosti ekspertnykh otsenok v metode analiza ierarkhii. Vestnik IGEU, 5, 1–4.
  • Myronova, N. A. (2011). Yntehratsyia modyfykatsyi metoda analyza yerarkhyy dlia system podderzhky pryniatyia hruppovikh reshenyi. Radioelektronika, informatyka, upravlinnia, 2, 47–54.
  • Anischenko, L. Ia. (2009). Teoreticheskoe obosnovanie kombinirovannogo metoda priniatiia reshenii v zadachakh mnogokriterialnoi kompleksnoi otsenki vozdeistviia i upravleniia ekologicheskoi bezopasnostiu protiazhennykh gidrotekhnicheskikh sooruzhenii. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2, 21–28. Available at: http://journals.uran.ua/eejet/article/view/3191
  • Honcharenko, I. O., Pisnia, L. A., Kiriienko, M. M. (2019). Rezultaty ekspertno-analitychnoho otsiniuvannia ekolohichnoi nebezpeky ta vazhlyvosti zakhodiv upravlinnia ta kontroliu v protsesi utvorennia tverdykh pobutovykh vidkhodiv. Inzheneriia pryrodokorystuvannia, 1, 103–113.
  • Anishchenko, L. Ya., Honcharenko, I. O., Markina, N. K., Dotsenko, O. O., Pisnia, L. A., Sverdlov, B. S. (2018). Umovy ekolohichno bezpechnoi ekspluatatsii diiuchykh v Ukraini polihoniv TPV. Problemy okhorony navkolyshnoho pryrodnoho seredovyshcha ta ekolohichnoi bezpeky, 40, 25–41.