Published December 19, 2017 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Diplopeltidae Filipjev 1918

Description

Key to genera of Diplopeltidae

See Table 4 for additional diagnostic characters.

1. Amphidial fovea a transverse slit; cuticle with ten longitudinal ridges.... Edalonema Andrássy, 2007

– Amphidial fovea double-loop-shaped in male, unispiral in female.................. Belgopeltula gen. nov.

– Amphidial fovea unispiral................................................................................................................ 2

– Amphidial fovea loop-shaped........................................................................................................... 4

2. Basal bulb absent; freshwater or terrestrial........................................ Cylindrolaimus de Man, 1880

– Basal bulb present; marine................................................................................................................ 3

3. Single anterior ovary................................................................ Intasia Tchesunov & Miljutina, 2008

– Two ovaries (anterior and posterior)....................................................... Southerniella Allgén, 1932

4. Oral opening shifted to the ventral body side............................ Morlaxia Vincx & Gourbault, 1988

– Oral opening apical or shifted to the dorsal body side..................................................................... 5

5. Basal pharyngeal bulb present; ovaries antidromously reflexed............... Mudwigglus Leduc, 2013

– Basal pharyngeal bulb absent; ovaries outstretched......................................................................... 6

6. Lateral alae present, in some species fused with the ventral limb of the amphid.................................................................................................................................................. Campylaimus Cobb, 1920

– Lateral alae absent............................................................................................................................ 7

7. Amphid in a shape of rounded loop.................................................................................................. 8

– Amphid in a shape of elongated loop............................................................................................. 10

8. Anterior body region abruptly narrowing; amphid at a distance equal to more than five labial region diameters from the anterior end............................................. Metaraeolaimoides De Coninck, 1936

– Anterior body region cylindrical or subcylindrical; amphid at a distance equal to less than two labial region diameters from the anterior end............................................................................................. 9

9. Buccal cavity cup-shaped; pronounced sexual dimorphism in the amphid size (large in males and small in females).................................................................................. Pararaeolaimus Timm, 1961 – Buccal cavity conical; no sexual dimorphism in the amphid size.......... Araeolaimus de Man, 1888

10. Cervical (paramphideal) setae absent; caudal glands open via three separate pores........................................................................................................................................... Diplopeltula Gerlach, 1950

– Cervical (paramphideal) setae present; caudal glands open via common spinneret........................11

11. Amphid located on a well-developed refractive subcuticular plate.............................................................................................................................................. Diplopeltis Cobb in Stiles & Hassal, 1905

– Refractive subcuticular plate absent.......................................... Pseudaraeolaimus Chitwood, 1951

Notes

Published as part of Holovachov, Oleksandr, 2017, Belgopeltula belgica (Vincx & Gourbault, 1992) gen. et comb. nov. and Mudwigglus micramphidium sp. nov. from the west coast of Sweden, and reappraisal of the genus Pseudaraeolaimus Chitwood, 1951 (Nematoda: Araeolaimida: Diplopeltidae), pp. 1-21 in European Journal of Taxonomy 383 on pages 17-19, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2017.383, http://zenodo.org/record/3839807

Files

Files (4.4 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:7b0da7bcb55b55bd6f5bfca5ba7f8ed5
4.4 kB Download

System files (38.8 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:643225d3b68016c299c1f2101d57e7ac
38.8 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Family
Diplopeltidae
Kingdom
Animalia
Order
Araeolaimida
Phylum
Nematoda
Scientific name authorship
Filipjev
Taxon rank
family
Taxonomic concept label
Diplopeltidae Filipjev, 1918 sec. Holovachov, 2017

References

  • Tchesunov A. V. & Miljutina M. A. 2008. A new free-living nematode Intasia monohystera gen. n., sp. n. (Nematoda, Araeolaimida, Diplopeltidae) from the Barents Sea and the White Sea, with a key to genera of Diplopeltidae. Russian Journal of Nematology 16: 33 - 48.
  • Allgen C. 1932. Weitere Beitrage zur Kenntnis der marinen Nematodenfauna der Campbell-insel. Nyt Magazin for Naturvidenskaberne 70: 97 - 198.
  • Leduc D. 2013. Mudwigglus gen. n. (Nematoda: Diplopeltidae) from the continental slope of New Zealand, with description of three new species and notes on their distribution. Zootaxa 3682: 351 - 370. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 3682.2.8
  • Cobb N. A. 1920. One hundred new nemas. (Type species of 100 new genera). Contributions to a Science of Nematology 9: 217 - 343.
  • Timm R. W. 1961. The marine nematodes of the Bay of Bengal. Proceedings of the Pakistan Academy of Sciences 1: 1 - 88.
  • Gerlach S. A. 1950. Die Diplopeltiden, eine Gruppe freilebender Nematoden. Kieler Meeresforschungen 7: 138 - 156.