Published June 17, 2019 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Negative feedback processes following drainage slow down permafrost degradation

  • 1. Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany
  • 2. North‐East Scientific Station, Pacific Institute for Geography, Far‐East Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Cherskii, Russia

Description

Abstract The sustainability of the vast Arctic permafrost carbon pool under climate change is of paramount importance for global climate trajectories. Accurate climate change forecasts, therefore, depend on a reliable representation of mechanisms governing Arctic carbon cycle processes, but this task is complicated by the complex interaction of multiple controls on Arctic ecosystem changes, linked through both positive and negative feedbacks. As a primary example, predicted Arctic warming can be substantially influenced by shifts in hydrologic regimes, linked to, for example, altered precipitation patterns or changes in topography following permafrost degradation. This study presents observational evidence how severe drainage, a scenario that may affect large Arctic areas with ice-rich permafrost soils under future climate change, affects biogeochemical and biogeophysical processes within an Arctic floodplain. Our in situ data demonstrate reduced carbon losses and transfer of sensible heat to the atmosphere, and effects linked to drainage-induced long-term shifts in vegetation communities and soil thermal regimes largely counterbalanced the immediate drainage impact. Moreover, higher surface albedo in combination with low thermal conductivity cooled the permafrost soils. Accordingly, long-term drainage effects linked to warming-induced permafrost degradation hold the potential to alleviate positive feedbacks between permafrost carbon and Arctic warming, and to slow down permafrost degradation. Self-stabilizing effects associated with ecosystem disturbance such as these drainage impacts are a key factor for predicting future feedbacks between Arctic permafrost and climate change, and, thus, neglect of these mechanisms will exaggerate the impacts of Arctic change on future global climate projections.

Notes

Funding information Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, Grant/Award Number: 727890 and 773421; AXA Research Fund, Grant/Award Number: PDOC_2012_W2; Seventh Framework Programme, Grant/Award Number: 282700 and PCIG12-GA-201-333796; Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Grant/Award Number: 03G0836G and 03F0764D

Files

gcb.14744.pdf

Files (1.4 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:6b6fe7052bc60072ccc66ecf22809d11
1.4 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Funding

PERCCOM – Permafrost Carbon Cycle Observations and Modeling across multiple spatiotemporal scales 333796
European Commission
Nunataryuk – Permafrost thaw and the changing arctic coast: science for socio-economic adaptation 773421
European Commission
PAGE21 – Changing Permafrost in the Arctic and its Global Effects in the 21st Century 282700
European Commission
INTAROS – Integrated Arctic observation system 727890
European Commission