Published April 26, 2020
| Version 0
Proposal
Open
Ants-Review: a Bounty-like system for Open Anonymous Scientific Peer-Reviews
Creators
- 1. Neurospin CEA Inserm U992, Sorbonne university, faculty of science
- 2. Independent blockchain engineer
Description
Peer-review is a necessary and essential quality control step for scientific publications. However, the process, which is very costly in terms of time investment, not only is not remunerated but it’s also not recognized by the academic community as a relevant scientific output for a researcher. Therefore, scientific dissemination is affected. Here, to solve this issue we propose a blockchain-based incentive protocol that rewards scientists also for their contributions to other scientists’ work and that builds up a reputational system. We designed a basic Bounty-like contract called AntsReview that allows any author to issue a call for peer-reviewing their scientific publication. If requirements are met, peer-reviews will be audited by an external editor and payed by the Issuer. To promote ethical behaviour the system will implement a quadratic funding on AntsReview.
Notes
Whitepaper for the project 'Ants-Review' submitted by the team 'MetaBounty' at the ETHTurin 2020 Hackathon (https://ethturin.com/hacks).
ETHTurin was the first Italian hackathon of the Ethereum Community, where hackers could develop Ethereum-based blockchain applications addressing Local Impact and SDG targets.
The Ants-Review project won the first prize at the main track of the hackathon. Sponsors were: University of Turin, Gitcoin, Ethereum foundation.
Files
ETHTurin2020_team2_AntsReview_v0.pdf
Files
(101.5 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:31ab1d6d72a1e1ca66b6e4608e40c0a3
|
101.5 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- b8d5ad9d974a44e7e2882f986467f4d3 (2016, August 12). Towards Open Science: The Case for a Decentralized Autonomous Academic Endorsement System. Zenodo. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.60054
- Buterin, Vitalik (2018). A Next-Generation Smart Contract and Decentralized Application Platform. Ethereum Whitepaper. https://github.com/ethereum/wiki/wiki/White-Paper.
- EuroScientist; Louet, Sabrina (2018, January 31). Podcast: How open science could benefit from Blockchain. https://www.euroscientist.com/podcast-open-science-benefit-blockchain/
- Filippova, Evgeniia; Voshmgir, Shermin (2018). Blockchain Solutions for Scientific Publishing. Medium, June 19 2018. https://medium.com/crypto3conomics/blockchain-solutions-for-scientific-publishing-ef4b4e79ae2
- Jan, Zeeshan; Third, Allan; Bachler, Michelle and Domingue, John (2018). Peer-reviews on the blockchain. In: RefResh 2018: 1st Workshop on Reframing Research, 5 Dec 2018, Cologne, Germany.
- Janowicz, Krzysztof; Regalia, Blake; Hitzler, Pascal; Mai, Gengchen; Delbecque, Stephanie; Fröhlich, Maarten; Martinent, Patrick and Lazarus, Trevor (2018). On the Prospects of Blockchain and Distributed Ledger Technologies for Open Science and Academic Publishing. Semantic Web, 9, 5, IOS Press.
- Leible, Stephan; Schlager, Steffen; Schubotz, Moritz and Gipp, Bela (2019). A Review on Blockchain Technology and Blockchain Projects Fostering Open Science. Front. Blockchain 2:16. https://doi: 10.3389/fbloc.2019.00016
- Nakamoto, Satoshi (2009). Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. May 2009. Whitepaper. https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf.
- Ross-Hellauer T. What is open peer review? A systematic review [version 2; peer review: 4 approved]. F1000Research 2017, 6:588. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11369.2
- Science, Digital; van Rossum, Joris (2017). Blockchain for Research. figshare. Report. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5607778.v1
- Sellier, Alexis; Diakomichalis, Eleftherios; Haydon, James (2019). Open Source Coin Trust And Sustainability In Open Source Communities - Version 1.0, Whitepaper. http://oscoin.io/.
- Tennant JP, Dugan JM, Graziotin D et al. (2017). A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review [version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations], F1000Research, 6:1151: https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12037.1.
- https://docs.openzeppelin.com/upgrades/2.8/writing-upgradeable
- https://ens.domains/
- https://github.com/AztecProtocol
- https://github.com/Bounties-Network/StandardBounties
- https://github.com/trufflesuite/ganache
- https://github.com/trufflesuite/truffle
- https://solidity.readthedocs.io/en/v0.6.6/
- https://vitalik.ca/general/2019/12/07/quadratic.html
- https://www.rinkeby.io/