Published June 1, 2018 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Mesolamprops Given 1964

Creators

Description

Mesolamprops Given, 1964

Mesolamprops Given, 1964: 288.

Type species. Mesolamprops bispinosus Given, 1964, by original designation.

Diagnosis. Carapace not dorsoventrally flattened, marginal carina absent, eyelobe present, pseudorostral lobes short, blunt. Antennule flagella well developed, accessory flagellum at least 0.5 length of main flagellum. Mandible navicular. Maxillule palp with 2 setae. Pereopod 1 slender, basis as long as all other articles together. Pereopod 5 longer than pereopod 4 basis. Telson long, at least 2/3 length of uropod peduncles. Uropod endopod of 3 articles. Uropod exopod article 1 at least 0.5 length of article 2. Female with fully developed exopod on pereopod 2, rudimentary exopods on pereopods 3–4, without pleopods. Male with long antenna, extending past pereon, without penial lobes, with 2 pairs of pleopods.

Species. Mesolamprops abyssalis Reyss, 1978a, M. bispinosus Given, 1964, M. denticulatus Ledoyer, 1988, M. dillonensis Gladfelter, 1975, M. hartleyi Shalla & Bishop, 2007, M. japonicus (Zimmer, 1937).

Remarks. Given’s original description (1964) of the genus included reduced pleopods in the male, in which the exopod, or lateral ramus, which is normally bi–articulate is reduced to a small projection. However, subsequent papers (Gladfelter 1975; Reyss 1978a; Ledoyer 1983) included species that possess two pairs of pleopods, but the state of the pleopods varies from that described by Given (1964). In Mesolamprops dillonensis, the pleopod is illustrated with equal rami, with a bi–articulate lateral ramus and a uni-articulate medial ramus. In M. abyssalis the pleopod is illustrated with 2 equally small uni-articulate rami, and in M. denticulatus the pleopod is illustrated with unequal rami, and the shorter lateral ramus is bi-articulate. The pleopod was not illustrated for M. hartleyi by Shalla & Bishop (2007). The only species with a pleopod that is like that of M. bispinosus is M. japonicus. In the additional description of M. japonicus provided by Tsareva (1999), it is clearly illustrated with a pleopod in which the lateral ramus is reduced to a small projection.

The species described by Gamô (1999) as Mesolamprops bacescui is clearly a member of the Diastylidae, as it has long articles in the male antennal flagellum, two pairs of pleopods without the medial process in the adult male, two terminal setae on the telson in both males and females, and distinct pre and post-anal sections of the telson. In comparison, all male lampropids with fully developed pleopods have a process on the medial ramus, short articles in the adult male antenna flagellum, no obvious pre and post-anal division of the telson, and three or more terminal setae on the telson. Thus, this species is hereby referred to Diastylis, as Diastylis bacescui (Gamô 1999) comb. nov.

Notes

Published as part of Gerken, Sarah, 2018, The Lampropidae (Crustacea: Cumacea) of the World, pp. 1-192 in Zootaxa 4428 (1) on page 92, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4428.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/3769771

Files

Files (3.4 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:b18ef5e0f3aaa99efe0cc09534661ae6
3.4 kB Download

System files (17.9 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:57fac8198a9f8e62c68bceda390c84de
17.9 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Family
Lampropidae
Genus
Mesolamprops
Kingdom
Animalia
Order
Cumacea
Phylum
Arthropoda
Scientific name authorship
Given
Taxon rank
genus
Taxonomic concept label
Mesolamprops Given, 1964 sec. Gerken, 2018

References

  • Given, R. R. (1964) The cumacean fauna of the Southern California continental shelf. No. 2, family Mesolampropidae. Crustaceana, 7, 284 - 292. https: // doi. org / 10.1163 / 156854064 X 00489
  • Reyss, D. (1978 a) Cumaces de profondeur de l'Atlantique nord, Famille des Lampropidae. Crustaceana, 35, 1 - 21. https: // doi. org / 10.1163 / 156854078 X 00150
  • Ledoyer, M. (1988) Cumaces (Crustacea) profonds de la region de l'ile de Mayotte, Canal de Mozambique, Ocean Indien (Campagne benthedi, 1977). Mesogee, 48, 131 - 172.
  • Gladfelter, W. B. (1975) Quantitative distribution of shallow-water Cumacea from the vicinity of Dillon Beach, California, with descriptions of five new species. Crustaceana, 29, 241 - 251. https: // doi. org / 10.1163 / 156854075 X 00289
  • Shalla, S. H & Bishop, J. D. (2007) Lampropidae (Crustacea: Cumacea) from the deep North-East Atlantic and the North Sea, with two new species of Hemilamprops and Mesolamprops. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 87, 1191 - 1200. https: // doi. org / 10.1017 / S 0025315407055063
  • Zimmer, C. (1937) Pazifische Cumacea. Explorations des mers de l'URSS, 23, 38 - 54.
  • Tsareva, L. A. (1999) Systematic position of a Cumacean Lamprops (?) japonica. Russian Journal of Marine Biology, 25 (5), 431 - 433.