Info: Zenodo’s user support line is staffed on regular business days between Dec 23 and Jan 5. Response times may be slightly longer than normal.

Published April 30, 2020 | Version v1
Journal article Open

CHOOSING THE PHYTOREMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR CLEANING VARIOUS TYPES OF WASTEWATER

  • 1. Scientific Research Institution «Ukrainian Scientific Research Institute of Ecological Problems» (USRIEP)
  • 2. The Committee of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine on Environmental Policy and Utilization of Natural Resources
  • 3. National Academy of the National Guard of Ukraine
  • 4. O. M. Beketov National University of Urban Economy in Kharkiv

Description

A methodological approach has been devised for determining the priority phytoremediation technology for the treatment of wastewater from settlements, based on the hierarchy analysis method (MAI). The proposed approach makes it possible to involve experts from municipal authorities of a settlement to substantiate decisions on managing the environmental safety of surface water bodies adjacent to the selected settlements.

The criteria (groups of factors) have been proposed, which reflected the input and output parameters of a treatment system, conditions at a construction site of treatment plants, and the requirements for phytoremediation technologies. Experts in various professional aspects gave their judgments regarding the priority of advantages of the mentioned criteria. The multidisciplinary experts’ judgments, which reflected the specific features of phytoremediation and the conditions for a would-be location of treatment plants, processed according to the scientifically based MAI procedure, formed the basis for decision-making on the choice of a priority phytoremediation technology under specific conditions.

The advantages of the proposed methodological approach include a possibility to link the entire array of the necessary information to a single algorithm for substantiating a solution. The information differs both in its content (environmental, biological, urban planning, social and economic) and in the form of its representation (the data on direct measurements, statistical and forecast estimates).

The proposed methodological approach has been tested based on an example of choosing the phytoremediation technologies for treatment plants at three different types of facilities such as an industrial enterprise, a residential building, and a city hospital. The obtained results demonstrated an acceptable level of conformity, which testifies to their reliability.

The devised methodological approach is useful for making managerial decisions on the choice of technology for the phytoremediation at treatment plants in order to substantiate their improvement or to build new plants

Files

Choosing the phytoremediation technologies for cleaning various types of wastewater.pdf

Additional details

References

  • Beans, C. (2017). Core Concept: Phytoremediation advances in the lab but lags in the field. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114 (29), 7475–7477. doi: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1707883114
  • Dmitrieva, O. O., Teliura, N. O., Vasilenko, V. P. (2018). Implementation environmentally safe wastewater as an element of sustainable human settlements development Ukraine. Municipal economy of cities, 7 (146), 174–179. doi: https://doi.org/10.33042/2522-1809-2018-7-146-174-179
  • Arthur, E. L., Rice, P. J., Rice, P. J., Anderson, T. A., Baladi, S. M., Henderson, K. L. D., Coats, J. R. (2005). Phytoremediation – An Overview. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 24 (2), 109–122. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680590952496
  • Comín, F. A., Sorando, R., Darwiche-Criado, N., García, M., Masip, A. (2014). A protocol to prioritize wetland restoration and creation for water quality improvement in agricultural watersheds. Ecological Engineering, 66, 10–18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.04.059
  • Verhoeven, J. T. A. (2014). Wetlands in Europe: Perspectives for restoration of a lost paradise. Ecological Engineering, 66, 6–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.03.006
  • Sumiahadi, A., Acar, R. (2018). A review of phytoremediation technology: heavy metals uptake by plants. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 142, 012023. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/142/1/012023
  • Ghanem, H., Chalak, L., Baydoun, S. (2019). Phytoremediation of Lebanese polluted waters: a review of current initiatives. MATEC Web of Conferences, 281, 03007. doi: https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201928103007
  • Maiga, Y., von Sperling, M., Mihelcic, J. (2017). Constructed Wetlands. Global Water Pathogen Project. doi: https://doi.org/10.14321/waterpathogens.66
  • Morley, M. S., Vitorino, D., Behzadian, K., Ugarelli, R., Kapelan, Z., Coelho, S. T., Do Céu Almeida, M. (2015). Decision support system for the long-term city metabolism planning problem. Water Supply, 16 (2), 542–550. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2015.167
  • Saaty, T. L., Ergu, D. (2015). When is a Decision-Making Method Trustworthy? Criteria for Evaluating Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 14 (06), 1171–1187. doi: https://doi.org/10.1142/s021962201550025x
  • Saati, T. L. (1993). Prinyatie resheniy: Metod analiza ierarhiy. Moscow: Radio i svyaz', 278. Available at: http://pqm-online.com/assets/files/lib/books/saaty.pdf
  • Maksimenko, O., Pancheva, H., Madzhd, S., Pysanko, Y., Briankin, O., Tykhomyrova, T., Hrebeniuk, T. (2018). Examining the efficiency of electrochemical purification of storm wastewater at machine­building enterprises. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6 (10 (96)), 21–27. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2018.150088
  • Isaienko, V., Madzhd, S., Pysanko, Y., Nikolaiev, K., Bovsunovskyi, E., Cherniak, L. (2019). Development of a procedure for determining the basic parameter of aquatic ecosystems functioning ‒ environmental capacity. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1 (10 (97)), 21–28. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2019.157089