Published January 12, 2017 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Spongillida Manconi & Pronzato 2002

  • 1. Division of Biology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Rajamangala University of Technology, Krungthep, Bangkok, 10120, Thailand. & Email: nisit. r @ rmutk. ac. th & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: D 7281 F 76 - 39 A 9 - 4156 - B 5 AD-B 4787 E 9818 B 8
  • 2. Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand and Centre of Excellence on Biodiversity, Bangkok, Thailand. & Email: narumon @ kku. ac. th & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: D 723 C 756 - 1 E 0 B- 4 D 5 B- 81 F 3 - BA 9 C 89915139
  • 3. Sakaerat Environmental Research Station, Wang Nam Khieo, Nakhon Ratchasima, 30370, Thailand. & Email: sakaerat @ tistr. or. th & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 6 D 5637 A 2 - 8 A 4 B- 4 B 7 B-ADF 5 - 299 CA 1501809
  • 4. Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, dell'Ambiente e della Vita, Università di Genova, Corso Europa 26, 16132, Genova, Italy. & Email: pronzato @ dipteris. unige. it & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: 78509 DD 9 - 09 BE- 4 AD 1 - A 595 - 16 BAFECED 04 C
  • 5. Dipartimento di Scienze della Natura e del Territorio, Università di Sassari, Via Muroni 25, 07100, Sassari, Italy. & urn: lsid: zoobank. org: author: ED 7 D 6 AA 5 - D 345 - 4 B 06 - 8376 - 48 F 858 B 7 D 9 E 3 & Corresponding author: r. manconi @ uniss. it

Description

Order Spongillida Manconi & Pronzato, 2002

We formally accept the new taxonomic status (rank elevation) of the previous suborder Spongillina as the new order Spongillida. The definition and diagnosis (emended after Manconi & Pronzato 2002: 921– 922 and Manconi & Pronzato 2011: 348) are here confirmed in part; we simply erase “ Haplosclerida with” from the beginning of the diagnosis; we add strongyles among megascleres, and we anticipate the presence of the earliest fossil of the taxon at the Upper Carboniferous. We also add a final sentence which states: “The order Spongillida is cosmopolitan in freshwater and brackish water and it is absent only from Antarctica.”

The rank elevation of the suborder Spongillina to the order Spongillida was proposed by Cárdenas et al. (2012) and Morrow & Cárdenas (2015), confirming the monophyly of freshwater sponges on the basis of both morphological (Manconi & Pronzato 2002, 2011) and molecular analyses (Itskovich et al. 1999, 2007, 2008; Addis & Peterson 2005; Meixner et al. 2007; Redmond et al. 2007; Morrow et al. 2012; Morrow & Cárdenas 2015).

Summarizing, from a morphological point of view, Spongillida are characterised by a skeletal architecture of monaxonid spicules (oxeas, styles, and strongyles) organized in isotropic/anisotropic networks of mono- to multi-spicular fibres, with scanty to abundant spongin. Microscleres are often present. Megascleres present as smooth, tubercled to variably spiny monaxons. The presence of resting bodies named gemmules is a trait shared by most families, genera, and species (ca 89%). Gemmules are a key diagnostic trait at genus and species levels. The closest taxon is the marine order Haplosclerida.

Notes

Published as part of Ruengsawang, Nisit, Sangpradub, Narumon, Artchawakom, Taksin, Pronzato, Roberto & Manconi, Renata, 2017, Rare freshwater sponges of Australasia: new record of Umborotula bogorensis (Porifera: Spongillida: Spongillidae) from the Sakaerat Biosphere Reserve in Northeast Thailand, pp. 1-24 in European Journal of Taxonomy 260 on page 5, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2017.260, http://zenodo.org/record/3776351

Files

Files (2.1 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:5103f69075872caaef8c8023735cc0ee
2.1 kB Download

System files (18.7 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:3c8fb282aadb08e5d61124e9c8d35127
18.7 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

References

  • Manconi R. & Pronzato R. 2002. Spongillina n. subord. Lubomirskiidae, Malawispongiidae n. fam., Metaniidae, Metschnikowiidae, Palaeospongillidae, Potamolepidae, Spongillidae. In: Hooper J. N. A. & van Soest R. W. M. (eds) Systema Porifera. A guide to the classification of sponges, Vol. 1: 921 - 1019. Kluwer Academic / Plenum Publisher, New York. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1007 / 978 - 1 - 4615 - 0747 - 5 _ 97
  • Manconi R. & Pronzato R. 2011. Suborder Spongillina (freshwater sponges). In: Pansini M., Manconi R. & Pronzato R. (eds) Porifera I. Calcarea, Demospongiae (partim), Hexactinellida, Homoscleromorpha. Fauna d'Italia, vol. 46: 341 - 366. Calderini, Bologna.
  • Cardenas P., Perez T. & Boury-Esnault N. 2012. Sponge systematics facing new challenges. Advances in Marine Biology 61: 79 - 209. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1016 / b 978 - 0 - 12 - 387787 - 1.00010 - 6
  • Morrow C. & Cardenas P. 2015. Proposal for a revised classification of the Demospongiae (Porifera). Frontiers in Zoology 12: 7 (27 pages). http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1186 / s 12983 - 015 - 0099 - 8
  • Itskovich V. B., Belikov S. I., Efremova S. M. & Masuda Y. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships between Lubomirskiidae, Spongillidae and some marine sponges according partial sequences of 18 S rDNA. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 44: 275 - 280. Available from http: // biodiversitylibrary. org / page / 40271025 [accessed 12 Sep. 2016]
  • Itskovich V., Belikov S., Efremova S., Masuda Y., Perez T., Alivon E., Borchiellini C. & Boury- Esnault N. 2007. Phylogenetic relationships between freshwater and marine Haplosclerida (Porifera, Demospongiae) based on the full length 18 S rRNA and partial COXI gene sequences. In: Custodio M. R., Lobo-Hajdu G., Hajdu E. & Muricy G. (eds) Porifera Research: Biodiversity, Innovation and Sustainability. Serie Livros: 383 - 391. Museu Nacional, Rio de Janeiro.
  • Itskovich V., Gontcharov A., Masuda Y., Nohno T., Belikov S., Efremova S., Meixner M. & Janussen D. 2008. Ribosomal ITS sequences allow resolution of freshwater sponge phylogeny with alignments guided by secondary structure prediction. Journal of Molecular Evolution 67: 608 - 620. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1007 / s 00239 - 008 - 9158 - 5
  • Addis J. S. & Peterson K. J. 2005. Phylogenetic relationships of freshwater sponges (Porifera, Spongillina) inferred from analyses of 18 S rDNA, COI mtDNA, and ITS 2 rDNA sequences. Zoologica Scripta 34: 549 - 557. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1111 / j. 1463 - 6409.2005.00211. x
  • Meixner M. J., Luter C., Eckert C., Itskovich V., Janussen D., von Rintelen T., Bohne A. V., Meixner J. M. & Hess W. R. 2007. Phylogenetic analysis of freshwater sponges provide evidence for endemism and radiation in ancient lakes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 45: 875 - 886. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1016 / j. ympev. 2007.09.007
  • Redmond N. E., van Soest R. W. M., Kelly M., Raleigh J., Travers S. A. A. & McCormack G. P. 2007. Reassessment of the classification of the Order Haplosclerida (Class Demospongiae, Phylum Porifera) using 18 S rRNA gene sequence data. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 43: 344 - 352. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1016 / j. ympev. 2006.10.021
  • Morrow C. C., Picton B. M., Erpenbeck D., Boury-Esnault N., Maggs C. & Allock L. 2012. Congruence between nuclear and mitochondrial genes in Demospongiae: A new hypothesis for relationships within the G 4 clade (Porifera: Demospongiae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 62: 174 - 190. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1016 / j. ympev. 2011.09.016